Mafiascum.net

I want to state again that I'm against an Alonzo wagon

the timing of his townreads/questions does indicate to me a level of genuine game-solving. posts like 206, 470, 490, 701 all registering on my town radar

and I felt his push on me was fair

That's fine, I still want him lynched

GL why don't you vote parmigiana with me

@Radiant - 467 and 468 don't really strike me as posts that scum would make

generally both he and Alonzo feel like D1 lynchbait

I might still come around on Parm but I wanna see more of who jumps on that wagon first

making it awfully hard for me to townread you

what do you think about my point about Michael Scott

ok so

like

I have the weekend off from work so I'll start doing whatever analysis w/e I usually do at some point in these games when I don't apathy out

I'd rather not do it today because I don't sleep on workdays and therefore haven't slept

so yeah

love you all <3

In post 829, GuiltyLion wrote:@Radiant - 467 and 468 don't really strike me as posts that scum would make

generally both he and Alonzo feel like D1 lynchbait

I might still come around on Parm but I wanna see more of who jumps on that wagon first

Thing is despite the effort to read me, his conclusions are poor, and he skipped straight over the most alignment indicative post I made (or rather didn't mention it because the meaning could be interpreted as either alignment.
Hasn't adjusted his read to anything I have done since, and hasn't looked at my larger meta)

Maybe it will change, but rn parm just looks agenda driven

Consider my vote on Michael Scott.

Can you vote Alonzo to compensate for the parry

Sure

VOTE: mbaki

In post 828, Alonzo wrote:

Parry Mbaki

thrust mbaki

Why did you perform your parry on mbaki, and not Parmigiano who you claim to be "scumreading", and also voting you?


Need more votes on Alonzo. implosion, Brigitte, want to do the honours?

Cheers.

In post 825, GuiltyLion wrote:I want to state again that I'm against an Alonzo wagon

the timing of his townreads/questions does indicate to me a level of genuine game-solving. posts like 206, 470, 490, 701 all registering on my town radar

and I felt his push on me was fair

What's your read on Varsoon?

Cheers.

In post 838, JohnnyEnglish wrote:

In post 828, Alonzo wrote:

Parry Mbaki

thrust mbaki

Why did you perform your parry on mbaki, and not Parmigiano who you claim to be "scumreading", and also voting you?


Need more votes on Alonzo. implosion, Brigitte, want to do the honours?

Cheers.

Jog on.

In post 833, Alonzo wrote:

In post 829, GuiltyLion wrote:@Radiant - 467 and 468 don't really strike me as posts that scum would make

generally both he and Alonzo feel like D1 lynchbait

I might still come around on Parm but I wanna see more of who jumps on that wagon first

Thing is despite the effort to read me, his conclusions are poor, and he skipped straight over the most alignment indicative post I made (or rather didn't mention it because the meaning could be interpreted as either alignment.
Hasn't adjusted his read to anything I have done since, and hasn't looked at my larger meta)

Maybe it will change, but rn parm just looks agenda driven

What you've done since also feels scummy. I read meta when it feels useful, I don't meta everyone I vote.

If you want to help you could link a scum game you're proud of.

Hey mbaki you're the only one in this game who knows my meta. Obviously that can be manipulated. But I'm a little wary of your townlean on me. Does that still exist?

I'm going to ignore that question and ask you this one: I have demonstrated an ability to read you in the past. Why would me having you as town at any point be scummy if you're town?

In post 843, mbaki wrote:I'm going to ignore that question and ask you this one: I have demonstrated an ability to read you in the past. Why would me having you as town at any point be scummy if you're town?

You having me as town is not scummy. You taking a very wishy-washy stance on me kind of is

But there are many reasons that you might not have a strong read on me that don't mean you're scum.

In post 841, Parmigiano Reggiano wrote:

In post 833, Alonzo wrote:

In post 829, GuiltyLion wrote:@Radiant - 467 and 468 don't really strike me as posts that scum would make

generally both he and Alonzo feel like D1 lynchbait

I might still come around on Parm but I wanna see more of who jumps on that wagon first

Thing is despite the effort to read me, his conclusions are poor, and he skipped straight over the most alignment indicative post I made (or rather didn't mention it because the meaning could be interpreted as either alignment.
Hasn't adjusted his read to anything I have done since, and hasn't looked at my larger meta)

Maybe it will change, but rn parm just looks agenda driven

What you've done since also feels scummy. I read meta when it feels useful, I don't meta everyone I vote.

If you want to help you could link a scum game you're proud of.

My scum game is pretty basic, I sheep shit townies with shit reads. I'm not proud of myself.

That's why I cast a suspicious eye at those lining up behind you...

Would it help more if I provided instances of mainly shit posting on day one and still hitting scum?

Iv a few of those... And who wouldn't be proud?

It's still implosion, folks.

Maybe as a treat il throw in the game where GL ruthlessly tvt'd me and it will explain much of the early game stuff vs GL too..

Seems like this is what you need to open your mind, I fear exposing you to my scum games is just gonna make you tilt on me more so than presently