Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 3:06 am
Dark cookies? Like double fudge?In post 824, Titus wrote:Dude, we need to talk. He's getting the dark cookies tonight or tomorrow.
If Panzer will hurt the masons, he can't have good cookies.In post 827, Shiro wrote:@Titus huh?
Indifferent. The Mason can be dumb as crap, you don't hurt Mason's or I hurt you. Got it?In post 831, PJ. wrote:mason. I will hurt mason. singular.
OoopsieIn post 833, Shiro wrote:Δο ςε ρεαλλυ βελιεωε τηε μασον ψλαιμ ψαθσε ηονεστλυ ι δο νοτ
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I mean this is mastina. She has litteraly done it before.
Yeah but I literally begged her not to claim day 1 since I didn't feel like getting shot so early. But we must support our family. Even during shitty desicions.
I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.In post 838, Shiro wrote:I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
On Day 1 in a large, if they live forever, I'll handle the problem. If they drop me, then worry. It's a Mason claim, worry about it later.In post 838, Shiro wrote:I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
True but Elsa could be mastina's beta. Unlikely and not worth pursuing but possible.In post 844, Alchemist21 wrote:I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.In post 838, Shiro wrote:I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
Sign onceIn post 847, Brock and Onyx wrote:I suppose it's pretty obvious who's posting rn, so I guess I don't need to sign, right?