1 I am leaning but not concrete that they are town.
3 is up in the air.
4 I think is town but want to see more from the replacement.
5 I'm not liking.
6 is town!
7 I think is town.
8 I don't remember.
Lady 7, what do you think of one of the gentlemen suggesting you lack a partner?
That would suck, but I didn’t realize anyone suggested it.
I’ve always been a pretty strong town asset, but I wouldn’t want anyone stuck with me if theY didn’t want to be.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:16 pm
by Lady 9
In post 800, Gentleman 5 wrote:We can only scumhunt in ladies right now and theres the possibility that all 8 of them could be town.
There are 9 ladies.
In post 803, Gentleman 6 wrote:I don't. 1 and 6 are either going to start posting or get replaced. 5's posting gives me a headache and I think they're above average scum equity.
Hey, I agree with you. I'd like for either lady 1 or lady 5 to be left out.
1 I am leaning but not concrete that they are town.
3 is up in the air.
4 I think is town but want to see more from the replacement.
5 I'm not liking.
6 is town!
7 I think is town.
8 I don't remember.
Hi. I know you're paranoid but we are on the same page, compare your reads to mine here:
I'm still left unsure on a lot of the gents, while I feel like I have better reads on the ladies. I'm not quite sure what to think of Gent 5, Gent 4, or Gent 3. Gent 6 I'm ready to say is town with decent confidence.
Gent 7 has made little impression on me although they've posted. I kind of liked them posting their theory in post 572, it seems town are more likely to look and talk about loopholes using game mechanics than mafia. That being said, I don't think that is a good idea, as has been pointed out.
Gent 8 has only posted in a jokey way so far.
Gent 1, I'm leaning town here, I don't agree with whoever said that they were posting just to. I do want to hear what their small concerns with me are
In post 824, Lady 6 wrote:I'll answer the last in a bit but the lady who should sit is the one who doesn't talk, says nothing when they do or talks so much that it blocks effective communication. That is the standard I will apply.
Right now that's you though, is this a lack of awareness on your part or are you committing to posting more?
I'd like for us to manage pairings as they happen to create T-T pairs, which is an effective way of winning in this setup, IMO. That necessitates that you get reads on everybody before predance is over
What about it? You think it was overly conciliatory?
Let's let the lady speak without supplying her with answers.
Cringe.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:21 pm
by Lady 4
I am baffled as to why Lady 3 is of no concern to anyone.
Sad to lose previous G2. He was a sweet boy.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:22 pm
by Lady 6
Alright I'm through page four and I'm perfectly ok answering Lady 5 should sit. Too much noise and forced emojis.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:25 pm
by Lady 4
I'm currently fine with any of 1, 3, 5, 7 sitting out.
If this were a Sadie Hawkins dance, I'd have asked G6 out a while ago. The rest just don't impress.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:26 pm
by Lady 6
I think G2 should aim for talkative scum. He's conftown. If he gets paired with a scum, he forces a 1 v 1 trade. If he hits a vocal player, the hood gives information.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:27 pm
by Lady 9
What's wrong with lady 3 and lady 7?
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:27 pm
by Lady 6
In post 840, Lady 4 wrote:I'm currently fine with any of 1, 3, 5, 7 sitting out.
If this were a Sadie Hawkins dance, I'd have asked G6 out a while ago. The rest just don't impress.
Odd, why are you saying I should dance?
Why can't you find a good man here? I think G5 is definitely worth linking to.
In post 840, Lady 4 wrote:I'm currently fine with any of 1, 3, 5, 7 sitting out.
If this were a Sadie Hawkins dance, I'd have asked G6 out a while ago. The rest just don't impress.
Odd, why are you saying I should dance?
Why can't you find a good man here? I think G5 is definitely worth linking to.
I haven't formed a strong opinion of you yet, but as you probably already have more posts than L1, it seems like you will at least try.
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:34 pm
by Lady 4
As for why few men appeal to me,
1 focuses on strange things, I don't think I understand him.
3 is a suspect of mine.
4 was recently replaced and hasn't done much besides roleplay.
5 might not be awful, but I don't think he's interested in me and I don't get what he's doing recently.
7 is too mechanically focused. I cannot read him.
8 is not even here.
What's right with 3? For real, please tell me why everyone likes her, I don't get it.
7 has had a few posts that made me think she might be town, but a lot more neutral unmemorable ones. I don't trust her.
Hmm, I remember liking Misty's early posts, and she had more content than a lot of people at the time
If the only posts from 7 are neutral or towny, shouldn't you want them to get a dance partner? It doesn't sound like you scumread her
In post 845, Lady 4 wrote:I haven't formed a strong opinion of you yet, but as you probably already have more posts than L1, it seems like you will at least try.
Hold on, are you leaving people out based on whether they will try, or whether you think they will flip scum? You're changing your method between posts here
Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:39 pm
by Lady 7
I thought l3s pop in about the g6/l8 showed some nice inquisitiveness. It kinda came out of nowhere iirc and it just felt like something she was chewing at. I liked it.
Forgot about this for a minute. I'll answer this by saying I didn't accept early (I didn't even accept the first offer I got), Gent 2 had been talking about it for a while, and finally made the decision to ask me. I'm counting on Gent 2 to lead the pairing discussion, as the IC, so when they say wait I wait, and when they say go I go.