In post 819, Aloratom wrote: In post 776, Luca Blight wrote:@
Tom:
I can understand your PoV a bit better now. Ngl, I was impressed by your play in that other game and have been disappointed by what I’ve seen from you so far. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt for now that you’re still working your way into the game.
UNVOTE:
I don’t think Paragon is a good lynch for today, so maybe you can try and work with me on someone else? How are you feeling about the Rob/Math slot?
I don't think anything that Robb did was particularly AI. He moved his vote a few places, settling on Pops. Ame's not wrong when she says that once Robb gets locked, he'll death tunnel. He'll even admit that. I have a feeling he was headed in that direction, and I give him credit for dropping the game when he did.
Anyway, NDMath's entry post
519 was somewhat odd in the sense that it looks like he put work into it, but it could have been written better and more thought could have been gone into it.
I was trying to get something posted with my thoughts on the game so far.
Not giving links to posts makes it difficult to follow trains of thought.
I didn't realize that I should be.
He didn't understand my push on Paragon obviously; I'm not sure what he means by me being scared of mechanics. He gives several other surface reads with no basis, and then gives a couple of possible scum trios: paragon/pops/? or fuzzy/rabid/?, but no reasoning behind them.
NDMath was taken in by the Paragon's Conspire con in
565, so I can understand some overall confusion there. And he makes a big push on Paragon in
767 that I'm not sure I completely get.
Perhaps the most striking thing I see is in NDMath's
519 entry post he was Town reading Paragon, and then in
565 he voted Paragon with no explanation other than "Gonna put my vote on paragon for now since I'm uncomfortable putting pops at L-1 at this moment." Those posts are timestamped about 10 hours apart. That's seems odd.
The read started to change in the middle of post 519, I kind of regret formatting the post that way but I wanted to give background to my initial thoughts. The initial townread was probably biased by play style, but I disliked the way he had handled people being frustrated with his post restriction claim, then the paragon/pops interaction was scummy.
I guess I can see a scum lean here, but I don't know that I'm ready to lynch the slot for being scummy yet. Actually, I'm a bit surprised you want to go after NDMath after your bit about it being easy for scum to get away with tunneling in this situation after their replacing out.
Do you want to lynch this slot because you find it scummy or for analysis?