Posted: Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:57 am
Gunna put MT into the maybe scum pile if ydrasse is actually scum.
You shouldn't put us in the same pool because Isis doesn't want to be friendsIn post 824, Bell wrote:Strong town lean: isis, tea leaves.
These days, definitely scum, if I’m able to participate. Town if I have trouble participating, because I find when I have trouble participating as scum it 99% of the time will lead to my elimination.In post 816, Bell wrote:Gamma do you prefer playing scum or town?
ExactlyIn post 829, Bell wrote:So basically when you have free time you prefer to be scum and when you don’t you prefer to be town?
If you think of "unfiltered" as genuine, then this is understandable.In post 830, tea leaves wrote:Same with Farren he does some good solving but sometimes it just looks fake in a way.
I wasn't really satisfied by this Ydrasse! Could you explain it a little more than just feelings? I'm trying to understand why you thought it was scummy even after my explanations.In post 738, Ydrasse wrote:i mean, for the most part the way that you voted + the weird way you described it made me vote you; it seemed super out of place in comparison to what you were posting. i'm not convinced completely that you're scum but seeing that made me go !!!! in a bad way.In post 716, tea leaves wrote:Ydrasse could you go over why you still think I'm scum after everything I said? If I was scum I would just fake some nice sounding logic for why I voted Farren rather than try and be completely honest with what I was thinking back then which is what you and Isis don't like.
I'm thinking about if I should omgus you or not.
why do you feel like you have to announce it like that tho?
Why are you filtering yourself?In post 837, Farren wrote:If you think of "unfiltered" as genuine, then this is understandable.In post 830, tea leaves wrote:Same with Farren he does some good solving but sometimes it just looks fake in a way.
Isis said the same thing if tea leaves flips scumIn post 825, Bell wrote:Gunna put MT into the maybe scum pile if ydrasse is actually scum.
In post 113, Farren wrote:Purpose of 20 - an excuse for engaging clidd, specifically. I think I'm going to need extra interactions with him to be able to read him properly.In post 104, GuiltyLion wrote:@clidd - I think the couple of issues I have with Farren are that a few of his questions don't seem likely to advance the game in a useful way and are either blendy or stirring things - mainly 20 and 72. I also think the soft defense of Ydrasse may be a WK
Purpose of 72 - I didn't like the confidence level that 70 implied - at least if the post was sincere. But I did like the ... brashness, I guess? I was trying to figure out a way to divorce the two, figure out which is more indicative. Based on Gamma's answer, I'd say the brashness - which is a small plus.
As far as defending Ydrasse goes: describing her as "Friendly" was not a defense. It was more a probe on Menalque to see if he was advocating for "Friendly = Scummy," - which he was not. The only other post - 62 - yes, that's a small plus to Ydrasse, as it's something I'd noticed as well. Why would you think that constitutes white knighting?
In post 121, Farren wrote:Cold and calculating is how I play. At least up until something clicks and I go full-bore Inquisitor. Usually coincides with becoming conf-town, if and when that happens. One of the reasons I prefer Open or semi-Open setups, and part of the reason I signed up to play this setup in particular.In post 119, Morning Tweet wrote:So if I'm getting this right, you asked clidd the question about his opening in 20 with the explicit purpose of getting extra interactions with him?
And not just that, but describing Ydrasse as friendly was actually to see whether or not Mena was equivocating friendly with scummy.
...i wish i had that much direction in my opening posts
This was stuff that I found fake early on. I gotta run so this'll have to do!In post 26, Farren wrote:Nope. As much as I would have enjoyed conspiring with you, I definitely breathed a sigh of relief when I saw the reroll.In post 21, GuiltyLion wrote:I actually rolled scum in the original roll of this setup and it was very scary indeed!
VOTE: Farren
did you roll scum again?
fmpov, the way you positioned dunn and farren as your scumreads and then chose to vote the one who DIDN'T have a wagon on him at the time seemed to me as if it was an effort to divert/split pressure between people. i didn't understand why you would choose to place a vote that would not accomplish a lot versus the pressure of putting dunn on a heavier wagon while also poking/prodding at farren? it seemed like a move someone would make where they want to look like they're busy when they're not.In post 838, tea leaves wrote:I wasn't really satisfied by this Ydrasse! Could you explain it a little more than just feelings? I'm trying to understand why you thought it was scummy even after my explanations.In post 738, Ydrasse wrote:i mean, for the most part the way that you voted + the weird way you described it made me vote you; it seemed super out of place in comparison to what you were posting. i'm not convinced completely that you're scum but seeing that made me go !!!! in a bad way.In post 716, tea leaves wrote:Ydrasse could you go over why you still think I'm scum after everything I said? If I was scum I would just fake some nice sounding logic for why I voted Farren rather than try and be completely honest with what I was thinking back then which is what you and Isis don't like.
I'm thinking about if I should omgus you or not.
why do you feel like you have to announce it like that tho?
It's natural, at least when I'm writing.In post 840, tea leaves wrote:Why are you filtering yourself?
Which tells me your radar for detecting these things is faulty. Especially 121.In post 842, tea leaves wrote:This was stuff that I found fake early on. I gotta run so this'll have to do!