Posted: Fri Dec 18, 2020 6:08 pm
Well this game is in a precarious state where I am very concerned about the lack of energy and think it must be intentional in some regard
Cool! I'll kick everyone until they wake up.In post 825, unwnd wrote:Well this game is in a precarious state where I am very concerned about the lack of energy and think it must be intentional in some regard
Cool lets lim Hank or Gera then!In post 830, unwnd wrote:Right now I'm looking in Johnny/Hank/Gera and even then that list is not from a perspective where I think this must be the 3 scum, it's just where I want to start so I can start accumulating some stronger townreads hopefully by causing action to take place.
I'm a very easy elimination, I'm surprised thr push on me hasnt been stronger. It will be no great loss for town if it happens.In post 832, Noraa wrote:Cool lets lim Hank or Gera then!In post 830, unwnd wrote:Right now I'm looking in Johnny/Hank/Gera and even then that list is not from a perspective where I think this must be the 3 scum, it's just where I want to start so I can start accumulating some stronger townreads hopefully by causing action to take place.
I haven't read up yet but I might since there's only like 30 pages.In post 833, unwnd wrote:...Just like that Noraa?
Did I say this before in this game I fucking swear I did
Oh boy this defeatist attitude sure doesn't remind me of town!you.In post 834, geraintm wrote:I'm a very easy elimination, I'm surprised thr push on me hasnt been stronger. It will be no great loss for town if it happens.In post 832, Noraa wrote:Cool lets lim Hank or Gera then!In post 830, unwnd wrote:Right now I'm looking in Johnny/Hank/Gera and even then that list is not from a perspective where I think this must be the 3 scum, it's just where I want to start so I can start accumulating some stronger townreads hopefully by causing action to take place.
Add more exclamation marks >:((((((((((((((((((In post 835, JohnnyFarrar wrote:It's Noraa! Hey yeah this games in a weird place. Biggest takeaway for me right now is town doesn't have a strong voice so we're all just kinda farting around. Hank's a good place to go for everyone tho, methinks.
VOTE: HANKY
My perception IS biased because of a few reasons, one of which is that from my understanding of Johny scum he will push tangential wagons in an opportunistic way.In post 771, unwnd wrote:I think your perception is biased. I think Johnny is playing strictly UTR and intentionally so. I haven't seen him really push anyone and to keep it simple he mostly posts fluff.In post 749, nopointinactingup wrote:Johnny is town because I know how he plays as scum, plus he’s actually been communicating with me, unlike the many people in this thread who completely ignores my line of questioning
Andres is the only voice of reason in this game. Most of FL's argument is predicated on the fact that he's town and therefore not really reliable. I also don't trust any of his reads, unwd and me are both town.In post 776, Andresvmb wrote: There were some arguments about how the votes stacked up, but it’s an inscrutable argument because it has to assume that Flavor is Town, and no one knows that but Flavor. If you noticed, Flavor was voted yesterday by a Confirmed Town, and by Dunn/Not_Mafia at one point. Which is why Flavor is throwing shade to the only other person on their wagon. Again, I’m not buying it.
This is a fair point, in that case do you have any particular reads in mind who's intentionally making the game passive?In post 778, unwnd wrote:Why do you think we no-limmed yesterday? This is slightly rhetorical. It's because people can't decide what they want, and I believe this isbecauseof predetermined elims. Like, people say 'I want X' as an example but getting your lim requires a bit more effort. There's not really anyone doing that and instead it's a lot of passivity which I'm starting to think is intentional. It's getting hard for me to distinguish posts between players because of this.
In regards to stubbornness, it attributes to the gamestate. You have people who are self-assured with just saying someone is scum is enough for others to simply agree and then accumulate votes. It's not that I'm requiring walls or deep intricate analysis, it's that I require some some sort of thought pattern to follow along with. I don't really feel like you answered my question and instead with 'well shelly does this'. Strip away your preconceived notions of shelly and tell me if she would make sense as scum just by the amount of attention she's accrued already.
In post 785, Flavor Leaf wrote:ah, okay, this is better.In post 777, Andresvmb wrote:^see 720. And that was about you unwnd, not nopoint. That last paragraph.
Yeah, I already stated my Unwnd reasoning with my VCA.
Are there any other particular reason why you think unwd is scum? I don't really trust VCAs alone because it's a concept that I use as scum sometimes. The problem with it is that it presupposed you are town and so you can draw all sorts of conclusion to your benefit.In post 793, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am 90% sure Unwnd is scum, and I would have been okay flipping them with a coinflip odds.
FL's claim is interesting. The claim itself is towny but I'm willing to bet FL is the type of person who gambits all sorts of things as scum.In post 811, Flavor Leaf wrote:I'm a Vigilante Enabler.
If anyone ever thinks I claim this scummy ass role as scum here, we're gonna have some words post game.
*** Reliving memories ***In post 826, Noraa wrote: cuz my first flawless scum win on site was a game where nopo and Johnny were my scum buddies.
shelly was a beacon of towniness and if u don't think so, its either bc ur scum or u don't understand her meta at all. I literally skimmed her ISO *SKIMMED* for maybe a minute and I was like YES IV REP ME IN I AM READYIn post 840, nopointinactingup wrote:Why'd you have to go and replace in a scummy slot
Ah I see how its supposed to be!