Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:17 am
hm okay i changed my vote once
that's still not a lot
that's still not a lot
At least check ur facts.
#owned
Page 34 of 124
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:17 am
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:18 am
wow
you're not getting away with that
you're not getting away with that
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:20 am
I'm TRing Norwee, this feels like a maf push
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:21 am
From who do you think?In post 828, flow trap wrote:I'm TRing Norwee, this feels like a maf push
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:24 am
Probably artIn post 829, NorwegianboyEE wrote:From who do you think?In post 828, flow trap wrote:I'm TRing Norwee, this feels like a maf push
A. Already SR them
B. I think they were the 3rd vote, rule of 3rd
C. They didn't explain their vote
D. They peaced out afterwards
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:28 am
In post 830, flow trap wrote:Probably artIn post 829, NorwegianboyEE wrote:From who do you think?In post 828, flow trap wrote:I'm TRing Norwee, this feels like a maf push
A. Already SR them
B. I think they were the 3rd vote, rule of 3rd
C. They didn't explain their vote
D. They peaced out afterwards
I don't think their vote was that bad, this justification doesn't seem like your typical scum justfication, i also disagree that they just placed their vote and left it at that, they clearly had some progression going from what i can see in their ISO.In post 798, Artemiana wrote:I kinda feel like the game is muddy and town is like
Getting distracted by some shiny things and mafia is largely non-existent. So
I think this vote is worse, just saying they are voting me because they can't get Mozamis.
VOTE: Rathe
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:29 am
That was an explanation?In post 831, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't think their vote was that bad, this justification doesn't seem like your typical scum justfication, i also disagree that they just placed their vote and left it at that, they clearly had some progression going from what i can see in their ISO.
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:33 am
They were saying they can't get a grasp on the game and voted me. Idk, too scummy to be scum?
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:33 am
I guess that's just confbias on my part
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:34 am
Rathe had just been voting Mozamis all game and when there was no longer traction on Mozamis they voted me, don't you think that's a little bit bad?
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:41 am
I need a thinking emoji 
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:43 am
Spoiler:
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 9:46 am
Hold on now, you can't present this banana, you need to present the photo of the banana, they are completely different
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:52 am
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:55 am
i would like to think i progress the game with my postings but id just be lying to myselfIn post 775, Jim Hawkins wrote:Esotericzoomer - I can see what you all mean now about posts that don't progress the game.In post 513, flow trap wrote:Jim, can you talk about esotericzoomer/Artemiana/KittyTacky/Rathe/Zulfy
Artemaiana - There is a fair amount of questioning, though a lot of it seems rhetorical.
KittyTacky - But I can see why Arte is tunneling....Kitty got caught trying to be both newb and seasoned, which is confusing and a minus. They give reads and opinions, which is a plus. But that comment about having an extra vote waiting in the wings to hammer was super sus.
Rathe - Absolutely null. It's like texting with a person who only responds, "k"
Zulfy - Also not much to go off of. Mostly responding without asking actual questions.
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 10:57 am
can you explain to me your owen read? im fairly with you on everything elseIn post 777, mozamis wrote:Rathe-Jim scum team? Classic scum distancing.In post 775, Jim Hawkins wrote:Rathe - Absolutely null. It's like texting with a person who only responds, "k"
Really hapy with lynching JIm, Rathe or Unowen still.
Maybe NOtMaf if we run out of ideas, but that is mainly policy/Antipathy on my part.
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 11:00 am
i would love to call you out on this but you did this same flipflop shit last game and was completely right so ehIn post 801, flow trap wrote:So now I think they're more town
townie tho since its in line with meta
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 12:43 pm
hey anya can you compromise on a jim wagon or nah
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:38 pm
I don't like how people are calling for Jimbo and no one has really explained what he did that comes from a scum mindset
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:40 pm
i echo this sentimentIn post 844, Artemiana wrote:I don't like how people are calling for Jimbo and no one has really explained what he did that comes from a scum mindset
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:41 pm
I'd say there is as much stated for Jim as Norwee
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:44 pm
In post 596, esotericzoomer wrote:oh btw im not voting jim because i said hes a potential policy lynch like before
after all his whining about people not liking his inactivity i checked his past games and saw he was a lot more involved compared to this game, and i know plenty of players who are very apathetic when they play as mafia
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:45 pm
the same jim hawkins who was fairly active in other games and made a lot of content and conversation topics in them, doesn't know how to join a discussion in this one because he isn't familiar with the players
i think that's a load of shit and he just doesn't know what to do as mafia
i think that's a load of shit and he just doesn't know what to do as mafia
Posted: Tue Mar 16, 2021 1:47 pm
he then goes on to make the excuse about being more active on the weekends, only to then make even less posts than he had before and his response to flowtrap seems very low effort and forced