Mafiascum.net

In post 822, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 821, Luca Blight wrote:I could see George and gypyx being partners actually

Because Gypyx is being kind awkward about George?

Also based on George’s post where he voted gypyx. It felt a bit off, and gypyx’s response seemed a bit strange as well like they were distancing but treating each other with kid gloves. George’s vote wasn’t particularly threatening as no-one else was voting gypyx and no-one is likely to sheep George.

Gypyx then limps onto this George wagon without conviction. It seems like possible half-hearted bussing to me

In post 800, VP Baltar wrote:The Ico wagon rose and fell very quickly, which suggests to me some kind of scum movement on one side of that. No clue which side.

Well you also put your vote on the wagon.
Do you have any thoughts about it or are you just going to keep being obtuse and give nothing conclusions?

In post 823, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Btw Wooper, is you choosing to play as Wooper relating to you wanting to have a less serious playstyle than when you're playing as 'The Worst' or is that just my imagination?

I’ve played with with ‘Wooper’ once before and he started slow but came good later on in the game as Town (no gimmick tho as far as I recall)

In post 824, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Not sure about VP Baltars random hypocritical attack on Datisi earlier. It's kinda an continuation of what i didn't like about him and what i keep finding scummy. How he always asks other people for their opinions and complaining about their inactivity, but their questions also feel pointless.

Am I scum?

In post 828, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 824, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Not sure about VP Baltars random hypocritical attack on Datisi earlier. It's kinda an continuation of what i didn't like about him and what i keep finding scummy. How he always asks other people for their opinions and complaining about their inactivity, but their questions also feel pointless.

Am I scum?

Maybe? Are you?

i wish the last page and a half hadn't happened, bc it lowkey sunk my read on literally everyone who's posted on them

Why?

In post 830, Datisi wrote:i wish the last page and a half hadn't happened, bc it lowkey sunk my read on literally everyone who's posted on them

Can you explain that?
Based on slots that have posted right now i'm thinking you and Luca are townie. Baltar leanscum.
I'm gonna join this wagon because i don't understand why George is this inactive and he hasn't been town so far.
VOTE: GeorgeBailey

In post 832, NorwegianboyEE wrote:he hasn't been town so far.

To the great shock of Anya.

In post 820, Datisi wrote:

In post 817, Gypyx wrote:also apparently the only way to get gera to play the game is to push his SR's or something

VOTE: george

do you scumread george? what are your reads anyway?

kinda do, not to the "kill him with fire" level but if i had a kill switch i'd press it

my reads prob go something like this :

+5 = conftown, -5 confscum
+3.5 geraintm
+2 NorwegianboyEE
+1.25 Luca Blight Wooper
+0.5 Iconeum Datisi
lol imagine having a read on Not_Mafia Anya VP Baltar
-0.5 AliceK GeorgeBailey
-1.75 innocentvillager

In post 831, Luca Blight wrote:Why?

In post 832, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Can you explain that?

i mean like

- vp's posts here are pinging me on a gut level (which tbf has been wrong before) but like idk. asking for my opinion then going "" and like i don't like the implication that i'm indecisive bc it kiiinda feels like it's saying i'm not participating properly (and as i type this out i realize it might be a slight stretch but fuck it i am typing it out anyway)

- wooper is defending gera? instead of contributing in ways that actually matter rn? and like i don't wanna attack shiptoasting but at some point we need some more seriousness from that slot bc i'm not quite sure what is going on there rn

- iv is like fine i guess idk.

- luca is fine except for 814 which for ??? reasons is making me not like it. idk it feels like talking down / asserting yourself in a sorta scummy "i'm right, you're wrong" way

- what the fuck is gypyx doing. he has no reads. it feels like he's posting for the sake of posting. (pedit: i see he's provided a readslist of some sort but that doesn't change my mind on his earlier posts being bad)

- norwee is also kinda ok and being norwee. i can't make up anything negative for him here.

like i am *aware* these things aren't necessarily scum!indicative but in this gamestate i'm getting bullshit pings from those things and it's annoying and i'm annoyed at not being able to figure this game out better by now??

In post 834, Gypyx wrote:+0.5 Iconeum Datisi

could you provide an elaboration on this tier?

i kiiinda like you / ico, but i know that you're pretty good at scum these days / haven't done anything stellar so far, and let's be real my read on ico a stretch

considering you've played in and/or modded most of my recent scumgames, i'd have expected town!you to like. have more of an opinion there. maybe i'm being overly egoistical. who knows.

is there anything else on ico other than the one thing you said earlier?

Datisi’s Town-spewing rn and I’m suspicious of Gypyx for still sitting on the fence wrt Datisi

In post 835, Datisi wrote:- norwee is also kinda ok and being norwee. i can't make up anything negative for him here.

Then why did you say

Given the last few pages, I'm very uncertain that George is scum. There's some lazy slumping on here happening.

In post 840, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 835, Datisi wrote:- norwee is also kinda ok and being norwee. i can't make up anything negative for him here.

Then why did you say

Ę̷̲͚̠̞̼̖͚͈̅̇͒̓͐̉̊̋̔͒͝͝͝V̵̨̦̫͋͛E̸̬̹̪͇̭̹̲̗̎̓̔̇̏̽͝R̷̢̢̪̝̙̙̲̗̣͙̘̯͙̞͂͋̿̕Ȳ̷͖̭̣̮̺͍̤̟̯̣̠̃O̶̎̅̈͛͒͗̍̒̆̂̈́̕͜͝N̵̜̗͕̼̗̤̼̞͚̳̪̣̾͒̈́́̓͋͛̋͆̽͗̆͂̎͜͜͝ͅE̸̢̡̛̠͖̗̤̯͔̦͔̲͚͙͋͆͋̈́̂̽̇̍̆̑͠͝

i didn't want your sorry ass to feel excluded, and this is the thanks i get?

The gamestate sucks tbh and always will when there are multiple players barely contributing

Luca, what's your take on how the George wagon built given you were the first vote?

In post 823, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Btw Wooper, is you choosing to play as Wooper relating to you wanting to have a less serious playstyle than when you're playing as 'The Worst' or is that just my imagination?

this post is useless and brings nothing to the table

are you happy now?

Not really, depending on their answer it helps my read on the Wooper slot.

In post 844, VP Baltar wrote:Luca, what's your take on how the George wagon built given you were the first vote?

I’ve already said I suspect gypyx, don’t like his vote and could see him and George being s/s

Don’t particularly like Wooper’s vote or recent play either

The rest seems fine

In post 841, VP Baltar wrote:Given the last few pages, I'm very uncertain that George is scum. There's some lazy slumping on here happening.

Ok i like my George vote now.

In post 835, Datisi wrote:- vp's posts here are pinging me on a gut level (which tbf has been wrong before) but like idk. asking for my opinion then going "well you don't see *me* going how i can't read anyone" and like i don't like the implication that i'm indecisive bc it kiiinda feels like it's saying i'm not participating properly (and as i type this out i realize it might be a slight stretch but fuck it i am typing it out anyway)

I'm not saying you're not participating properly, btw. You can do what you want. But I'm just getting slightly annoyed with multiple people being like "NM, geraint and the lurker crew...no way we can solve today!"

Like, I highly doubt all the scum are in the lurker pool. Someone active is surely scum. I'm not resigning to a fuck it yeet today unless we are policing NM (and even that is suboptimal).