Mafiascum.net

In post 821, Nathann wrote:

In post 816, GrandpaMo wrote:Wait -- I think I got it confused. I am in a hood with Titus and DGB... and we think titus is scum.

Didn't the IC say that nobody in this game has Daytalk or am I imagining that?

Hm that's weird if true.

In post 824, Enchant wrote:

In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 808, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus

Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I told them in mason chat, that titus is town but they are voting them. So if you want to carry the weight that either of us are scum, you can drop it now.

Why the fuck you claimed?

Like
For what... Why?

Because I serve no purpose. It is also to help levitate on why titus could be scum. just look at me and dgb prior's interactions.

In post 148, Jolyne wrote:

In post 114, Kazyan wrote:

In post 112, Jolyne wrote:My info is:

There are only 2 mafia.

There is no daytalk1

That second bit is right there in the game rules, so...

I know for a fact no one has it.

In post 195, Jolyne wrote:

In post 181, Andresvmb wrote:So you’re an Informed IC? I have to say, I’m a bit terrified of the potential for Scum shenanigans. If this game actually was mountainous with 2 Scum, it would be horribly unbalanced. At least to me it would. That’s what, 4 mis-executions before you get to ELo? There’s no way.

not only are we guaranteed only 2 people aligned with mafia, there is 100% no encryptors meaning that scum can't even communicate.

Jolyne, does your information say no Mafia Encryptors or no Encryptors period?

In post 804, Dwlee99 wrote:Grandpa are you an alt cause you seem to have some impression of the way I play and I'm not sure where it comes from?

Does scum really say this? You are really starting to make me doubt my scumread on you. Dammit.

In post 822, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 820, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 818, Andresvmb wrote:You confused Masons with Neighbors?

Yes. I wish I can link you to the game where I did before, it was a discord hybrid closed game.

They serve some of the same function -- besides me thinking masons could be mafia alligned lol. But now I realized masons is an ACTUAL role and not a modifier to be used interchangeably.

I really do think that the distance between Masons and Neighbors is massive.

In post 827, Nathann wrote:

In post 148, Jolyne wrote:

In post 114, Kazyan wrote:

In post 112, Jolyne wrote:My info is:

There are only 2 mafia.

There is no daytalk1

That second bit is right there in the game rules, so...

I know for a fact no one has it.

In post 195, Jolyne wrote:

In post 181, Andresvmb wrote:So you’re an Informed IC? I have to say, I’m a bit terrified of the potential for Scum shenanigans. If this game actually was mountainous with 2 Scum, it would be horribly unbalanced. At least to me it would. That’s what, 4 mis-executions before you get to ELo? There’s no way.

not only are we guaranteed only 2 people aligned with mafia, there is 100% no encryptors meaning that scum can't even communicate.

Jolyne, does your information say no Mafia Encryptors or no Encryptors period?

I believe this is just targeted for scum only.

In post 829, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 822, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 820, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 818, Andresvmb wrote:You confused Masons with Neighbors?

Yes. I wish I can link you to the game where I did before, it was a discord hybrid closed game.

They serve some of the same function -- besides me thinking masons could be mafia alligned lol. But now I realized masons is an ACTUAL role and not a modifier to be used interchangeably.

I really do think that the distance between Masons and Neighbors is massive.

Well titus and DGB have no reason to lie being in a hood. So please confirm this hood @titus @DGB.

Eeeeeeeh.

Unexpectedly reasonable, but mason claim send me off.

Also if you mistaked it already, why you didn't learn?

In post 832, Enchant wrote:Eeeeeeeh.

Unexpectedly reasonable, but mason claim send me off.

Also if you mistaked it already, why you didn't learn?

I still do it. That game was a long time ago.

If the Mafia doesn't have Daytalk without an Encryptor, the Neighbourhood shouldn't have it either. I wanna figure out what is happening and whether someone is screwing up their fake claim.

In post 834, Nathann wrote:If the Mafia doesn't have Daytalk without an Encryptor, the Neighbourhood shouldn't have it either. I wanna figure out what is happening and whether someone is screwing up their fake claim.

What fake claim? IC is confirmed. And DGB and titus can just confirm as well.

It's like there isn't 3 mafia just for the 3 of us to lie lol

We know there’s only 2 Scum, but the Neighborhood allegedly has 3 players. So that’s not a fake claim.

In post 836, GrandpaMo wrote:It's like there isn't 3 mafia just for the 3 of us to lie lol

In post 837, Andresvmb wrote:We know there’s only 2 Scum, but the Neighborhood allegedly has 3 players. So that’s not a fake claim.

smh just said that

It’s also a stupid fake claim anyway.

@Koba, I think the clumsiness behind the reveal is more often than not Town, but you tell me what you think.

In post 839, Andresvmb wrote:It’s also a stupid fake claim anyway.

@Koba, I think the clumsiness behind the reveal is more often than not Town, but you tell me what you think.

What...?

In post 840, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 839, Andresvmb wrote:It’s also a stupid fake claim anyway.

@Koba, I think the clumsiness behind the reveal is more often than not Town, but you tell me what you think.

What...?

I am arguing you aren’t lying, because you would have to be stupid to lie in this way and I don’t believe that. I also think you’ve been confusing / clumsy, because you confused Neighbors and Masons. And it’s interesting on top of that because the IC also has knowledge that there’s no daytalk (and the Rules indicate that there’s no daytalk by default).

I have damn sad feeling but i agree with Andre. Well.

Also, i have feeling we have third party (i mean stab-stabby one), otherwise it's unbalanced.

Nathann is hinting at you potentially being Scum and having screwed up your fake claim - I am quashing that. And you wouldn’t have (technically) been able to coordinate it, since you can’t discuss with your Scum Partner. It’s just all around unlikely, and I think it hints at you being Town. Having said that, I don’t understand you hinting at some sort of weird mechanic D2, and I want to understand that better, because alignment changes for example are decidedly not Normal for instance.

In post 837, Andresvmb wrote:We know there’s only 2 Scum, but the Neighborhood allegedly has 3 players. So that’s not a fake claim.

Yeah, I guess. I jumped at the "Neighbours claim + claimed Daytalk in Hood + IC said there's no Daytalk = Fakeclaim?", but it's never that easy, is it.

In post 842, Enchant wrote:Also, i have feeling we have third party (i mean stab-stabby one), otherwise it's unbalanced.

Can't have a Serial Killer in a Mini Normal, so no.

In post 841, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 840, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 839, Andresvmb wrote:It’s also a stupid fake claim anyway.

@Koba, I think the clumsiness behind the reveal is more often than not Town, but you tell me what you think.

What...?

I am arguing you aren’t lying, because you would have to be stupid to lie in this way and I don’t believe that. I also think you’ve been confusing / clumsy, because you confused Neighbors and Masons. And it’s interesting on top of that because the IC also has knowledge that there’s no daytalk (and the Rules indicate that there’s no daytalk by default).

Oh that you were calling my claim stupid. Lol.

:')

In post 845, Nathann wrote:

In post 842, Enchant wrote:Also, i have feeling we have third party (i mean stab-stabby one), otherwise it's unbalanced.

Can't have a Serial Killer in a Mini Normal, so no.

Yeah this is correct - I think there’s a minimum number of players required for it and a Mini Normal doesn’t fit. But I wouldn’t be totally surprised about the presence of say a Survivor role or something of the sort.

Actually, aren’t these games not supposed to be multi-ball?

Survivor is not normal.