Mafiascum.net

Ego

Kuribo is in this game?

Huh, so he is.

I'm scared if i talk about people town reading me that they will stop town reading me
I legit play my town games like scum half the time because I get miselimmed so much

im in a deep psychological state ama

In post 738, Alexandrite wrote:do you have no thoughts on the Shea vs. Fenrir situation that happened, mala?

-Gamma

Mala and I didn't have a PT until a couple hours ago which is fine because my participation is going to be spotty anyway for at least the immediate future. PT is easier to talk gamestuff than Snapchat tho

I've been skimming, dunno if mala has any thoughts on Shea v STD, but I'm townreading Shea so there's that

I can't read Mastina for shit on day one, just gonna call her town

Kinda surprised I'm not scum reading cakez, I always scum read cakez

In post 830, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:

In post 738, Alexandrite wrote:do you have no thoughts on the Shea vs. Fenrir situation that happened, mala?

-Gamma

Mala and I didn't have a PT until a couple hours ago which is fine because my participation is going to be spotty anyway for at least the immediate future. PT is easier to talk gamestuff than Snapchat tho

I've been skimming, dunno if mala has any thoughts on Shea v STD, but I'm townreading Shea so there's that

I can't read Mastina for shit on day one, just gonna call her town

Kinda surprised I'm not scum reading cakez, I always scum read cakez

Meant to sign my post, this is kuribo obv, in the future I'll sign my posts with a k

-k

So tell me who 1 town person is who is not me or you cakey one

Hi kuribo! Could I interest you in a gypyx wagon?

"ama"
*Leaves immediately*

So many pages happened

TSQ are you still on STD

Yeah. Still haven't seen a reason why any of his reaction to me was town.

It kind of feels like you've been weirdly me focused this game dwlee. Do you have thoughts and questions for the other players in the game?

In post 752, mastina wrote:
I am aware that both you and STD are experienced enough scum players to make a SvS or SvT fight look TvT, HOWEVER:
I think you are town by your posting;
I think STD is town by his posting;
I think the fight between you and STD looks town on both ends;
I think the people who have said the fight is TvT directly are, overall, a group

more

likely to contain scum rather than less.

so you're more likely to be scum according to your own words?



edit while reading further : yeah okay saw your answer to ralts, not a huge fan of admitting that you yourself are scummy but like i don't know how to play mafia so idk

In post 751, mastina wrote:

In post 359, Gypyx wrote:thinking about it, mastina, maybe you should put a reduction to the number of peeps who should visit you? Like, restrict it to half the PL or something, cuz i doubt we'd gain much worth from 4-5 of our powerful PRs taking a shot on you on the long term

I mean the problem with that is, the only way we'd have to know who should be the PR targeting me is if we had a D1 massclaim--with that obviously being something we shouldn't do, that means we have no way of coordinating it. We don't know who the best person to target me would be. And we have no way of limiting the number of players targeting me, either.

So my solution was just to leave it to the PRs in question, that if they think their role is strong especially with a second person getting a 1x copy of it, to have them target me.

yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?

In post 828, SirCakez wrote:I'm scared if i talk about people town reading me that they will stop town reading me
I legit play my town games like scum half the time because I get miselimmed so much

well, if you're scared to the point of "deep anxiety" or sumthin' then how come you're talking about it like that without

feels less like a preemptive apology (which eh, i guess it would be worth a slight townlean) and more like you're trying to publically project what your town mindset would be

In post 798, Milobird wrote:

In post 797, Bell wrote:I say this with love Gyphx.

-Bell

*grumbles.

-Bell.

Bell, bell, bell.

ya no worries, see what you mean there, altho it's been 3 months since i haven't had a real game of mafia, so i dunno, seems like pretty outdated meta to me?

In post 836, Thestatusquo wrote:Yeah. Still haven't seen a reason why any of his reaction to me was town.

Damn, thought maybe something in all those pages changed your mind

In post 837, Thestatusquo wrote:It kind of feels like you've been weirdly me focused this game dwlee. Do you have thoughts and questions for the other players in the game?

You're always around when I check the game. To have more thoughts I feel like I need to do more than skim the past few pages or just wait for more stuff to happen. Gypyx had the same reaction to that mastina post as me when I read the quote which is good

In post 839, Gypyx wrote:

In post 751, mastina wrote: -snip-

yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?

The approach I proposed in #503 would avoid that issue.

In post 843, imaginality wrote:

In post 839, Gypyx wrote:

In post 751, mastina wrote: -snip-

yeah but the problem is like, if we have 4-5 of our most powerful roles stack up on ya (which seems quite like a realistic thing to occur given the openeness of what could happen), it probably won't be of much worth in the end, because we essentially trade 3-4 night actions in exchange for hoping you're town and will use those well, see what i mean?

The approach I proposed in #503 would avoid that issue.

My response to this plan is who cares

In post 842, Dwlee99 wrote:that mastina post

752 btw

I don't like Gypyx and Ralts jumping on mastina's comment about the people who see TSQ v STD as TvT being more likely scum than not.

It seemed like deliberately reading the comment in the worst way.

Ralts raised it as a question whereas Gypyx continued to paint it as though mastina was calling herself scummy even after reading mastina's reply to Ralts. Which, like, I don't see why Gypyx bothers to post that as town, but as scum it is a chance to splash a bit of dirt on someone.

VOTE: Gypyx

On STD v TSQ my initial take was slightly suspicious of STD and pro town on TSQ. Someone mentioned TSQ plays like that as scum also so that tempers my town read slightly but I still like his side of it. Still figuring out how I feel about the STD side of it. I didn't see the initial post as scummy but the initial reaction to TSQ's pressure did feel a bit hmmm... Like, I didn't like the retrofitting 'oh but look at the reactions I generated' part of the conversation. However there was also a hint of confused 'what are you on about'-ness to it.

Interesting also at Gypyx defended STD against TSQ early in that debate.

Oh cool add Dwlee99 to Gypyx and Ralts on the pile of "scum shiftily sniffing for stuff to stir up so as to subtly scatter some sneaky suspicion on seemingly stand-up citizens"

I like Imaginality for town I think

I don't think Gypyx is scummy but eh, not objecting either

VOTE: gypyx
~ chowchow