Mafiascum.net

In post 823, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 795, marcistar wrote:"do i dislike anyone specific" sort of..
but i also just feel this isn't very likely to hit scum rn. i feel like up until recently, i've been the only one really not fine with the toxic stuff, even he didn't defend himself, i feel like when everyones fine with a wagon theres usually a big going on. there should be more pushback if hes scum, if not from his partners, then from him himself. if he had a team backing him up, would he have not been coming in in 727 with an idea on whats happening, and stay longer to start defending himself..? it feels like hes truly alone against everyone rn.
sure he could be scum, but to me i think "scummy seeming inactive town" fits him more rn.
feels like people are trying to get off easy <3 this as well seems very cherry picked, other people are similar to him rn but hes the one catching all the attention?

yeah, I get this
basically toxic can only make sense with certain team comps
the teaam could be something like toxic/NM/? tho

In post 826, Val89 wrote:Did you read what I said in 831, Norwee?

Invests, or indeed any PR with a night-targetable ability get switched off when an ascetic dies. Scum get more powerful when an ascetic dies. This looks like a game of "hunt the ascetic" for scum.

They might not need to hunt for them in the day; they could have powers that let them find them at night.

You don't understand why scum might be chomping at the bit to start pew pew-ing and hope they hit the mark, while giving said time-limited invests as little to go on as possible?

In post 816, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 815, DArby wrote:Even if I do end up on a toxic lem it does have a weird policy/rushed vibe to it. I’d like more to go into d2.

I don't see the point. I didn't want to rush it before, but now i don't care because i think his posts just now were scummy as fuck.

In post 818, Dwlee99 wrote:When has mafia ever gained anything out of a night phase except for maybe PR info

In post 833, Not_Mafia wrote:This day should be over already

In post 831, DArby wrote:

In post 816, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 815, DArby wrote:Even if I do end up on a toxic lem it does have a weird policy/rushed vibe to it. I’d like more to go into d2.

I don't see the point. I didn't want to rush it before, but now i don't care because i think his posts just now were scummy as fuck.

Wha? Even if god willing mod made Toxic confirmed scum, shouldn't we use the rest of d1 to figure out who else is most likely scum before we lose a town thru a nk?

In post 836, Jolyne wrote:

In post 831, DArby wrote:

In post 816, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 815, DArby wrote:Even if I do end up on a toxic lem it does have a weird policy/rushed vibe to it. I’d like more to go into d2.

I don't see the point. I didn't want to rush it before, but now i don't care because i think his posts just now were scummy as fuck.

Wha? Even if god willing mod made Toxic confirmed scum, shouldn't we use the rest of d1 to figure out who else is most likely scum before we lose a town thru a nk?

Whats your read on toxic then?

In post 826, Val89 wrote:You don't understand why scum might be chomping at the bit to start pew pew-ing and hope they hit the mark, while giving said time-limited invests as little to go on as possible?

In post 839, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Koba feels pedantic.

In post 835, Val89 wrote:Have you caught up, N_M, or are you just responding to the prod without realising the context in which you are doing so?

In post 841, camelCasedSnivy wrote:You very well know how N_M plays, why are you even questioning it lol

In post 839, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Koba feels pedantic.

In post 844, Val89 wrote:

In post 841, camelCasedSnivy wrote:You very well know how N_M plays, why are you even questioning it lol

Well, the context is fairly significant here, no?

We literally just establish that scum need to move this game into a night phase as quickly as possible in order to capitalise on the little setup information we had been given, and was staring us in the face this entire time, and the next thing N_M says is "this day phase should be over", I want to know if that was a conscious decision, or if he's just saying what he always does.

In post 843, Val89 wrote:I'm kicking myself that I spent 30 odd pages labouring under a misunderstanding as to what 'backup ascetic' meant, and thinking it didn't make sense for there to be town ascetics - but now that I do, the scum strategy here is simple, and it puts in to focus why some slots have been trying to drive into a night phase as quickly as possible.

I know you are going to tell us it's an unfortunate coincidence, that you had no idea you were advocating to a course of action that leads to a scum advantage, and a significant one, and you have just been a useful idiot, but I think Occams Razor applies.

In post 847, DArby wrote:

In post 843, Val89 wrote:I'm kicking myself that I spent 30 odd pages labouring under a misunderstanding as to what 'backup ascetic' meant, and thinking it didn't make sense for there to be town ascetics - but now that I do, the scum strategy here is simple, and it puts in to focus why some slots have been trying to drive into a night phase as quickly as possible.

I know you are going to tell us it's an unfortunate coincidence, that you had no idea you were advocating to a course of action that leads to a scum advantage, and a significant one, and you have just been a useful idiot, but I think Occams Razor applies.

Are you saying you believe currently there are town ascetics?