Mafiascum.net

In post 577, Yeet wrote:Humaneatingmonkey is +town because I have never seen scum ask town to blanketly explain every single one of their 10+ reads off a casual readslist as their first entry into the game. I think it's easy to feel too self conscious as scum in that approach.

I think he has his own "method to his madness" so to speak (as we all do, to an extent).

In post 581, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 579, fireisredsir wrote:what about the read list made you question it? i feel like that is a simple question that is at the crux of this debate and you still haven't given an answer to it

that she felt confident enough to have reads that early and that didn't seem possible to me because nothing was alignment indicative at that point. that's why i asked her to explain her POV.

In post 822, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 819, Nordom wrote:

In post 816, fireisredsir wrote:

In post 809, Nordom wrote:Nah, what? Is this your "gut-read" push here, fire?

nah your reason for townreading monkey was bs, and it looks like you're refusing to commit any more words to it to avoid digging yourself a deeper hole because you know it's bs. and nah the cocky attitude isn't going to stop me from voting you

Then why didn't you just say that from the start? It took you voting me after all those replies to finally say that?

because as i said i wanted to give you a chance to clarify your words to see if I was misinterpreting. or if I wasn't, so that you would spell it out more clearly and commit to your reasoning. your refusal to do so is telling. like i said tho, it's not really that important of a point, i think you're maf for other things as well

In post 590, VP Baltar wrote:I don't think that's an unreasonable argument for skitter to make fwiw. Something of that nature is much more likely to happen in pages 2-3 than it is to happen in pages 52-53.

In post 607, DeasVail wrote:UNVOTE: Eyes without a face

In post 641, Nero Cain wrote:I want Yeet and Fire and Scorpious and Nordom dead

skitter30 wrote:I mean:
- i have a lot od content in the 20 pages i dont think you read
- yes when i'm catching up i'm going to focus on the people and things that are being talked abt, yes.
- i'm not really sure what you're objecting to or what you're trying to imply exactly

skitter30 wrote:I mean:
- i have a lot od content in the 20 pages i dont think you read
- yes when i'm catching up i'm going to focus on the people and things that are being talked abt, yes.
- i'm not really sure what you're objecting to or what you're trying to imply exactly

In post 835, skitter30 wrote:Again, i'm catching up, and i'm talking abt the things that happened while i wasnt here, yes. To expect me to talk about thw people who arent here when i'm plainly still reading and dont know who they are is p silly

Also, i did talk abt wu, more than once actually ...

In post 836, skitter30 wrote:Also i wouldnt call wu the game's populalar push of the game either, but if you think he is kinda doesnt make sense to accuse me of only talking abt popular players but ignoring him at the same time

In post 838, skitter30 wrote:How am i supposed to know who isnt here if i'm still reading myself, and ehy should talking abt them be my priority?

In post 457, DeasVail wrote:

In post 215, Cape90 wrote:

In post 207, DeasVail wrote:Why is that worth discussing? If Frogsterking is town should we not then be discussing other things?

I would assume you are the type of player who wants opinions on scumreads versus building a town circle. I understand this correctly?

Not especially. I was puzzled more because I did not think calling Frogsterking town was a particularly controversial statement.

In post 486, Eyes without a face wrote:GOOD GOD. Twenty pages already?

In post 500, DeasVail wrote:VOTE: Eyes without a face

I’ll catch up on other stuff this afternoon

In post 504, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 501, Eyes without a face wrote:

In post 208, Aristeia wrote:here is my way too early vibe list:

good vibes:

yeet, frogster, fire, skitter, datisi, std

neutrali:

gwu, cape90, deasvail,

badvibes:

tenebro, monkey

OK.. so I take it that I'm the worst player then, because while everyone is discerning reads I have no concrete feelings so far (in page 9) that I don't think I'd vote or defend anyone if my life depended on it.

it's a bullshit readslist that pinged me and it deserves more attention. what deserves even more attention is the way she OMGUSed me when I called her out on it.

In post 508, humaneatingmonkey wrote:even the "absence" and "ghosting" that she claims i did was another one of those accusations you make as scum because you have nothing else as ammo.

dude, it's been barely a day.

In post 523, VP Baltar wrote:I just finished reading through page 10, so I'm still in catch up. Here is kind of what I have for reads out of that so far:


Town:

Frogsterking

- early attack on Yeet over game delay is tinfoil I'd expect from town FK

Yeet

- wild noob read after wild noob read. Somewhat question if Yeet is not an alt though, in which case maybe this means nothing.

fireisredsir

- has independent thought, calling out post 116 as bad is good. Also seems to not mind poking people, which I appreciate.

skitter30

- Kind of like their pressure on Datisi, but think the over defense of tenesbro is unwarranted. This is probably closer to a null read than a townread in terms of confidence, but I like that she is mixing it up.

Cape90

- probably town for finding frogster town and asking pretty open questions.

Ari

- I like her pressure and vote on monkey when he was being kind of ridiculous.


Null:

DeasVail

- commenting, but not doing a ton. Maybe lean townish.


Scum:

fua

- I find the hard scum read of tenesbro a little contrived, and possibly piling on to a popular opinion in thread.

monkey

- The whole intereaction with ari looks like monkey got over confident with a poke and couldn't explain the position.

In post 524, fireisredsir wrote:have kind of a hard time believing that monkey really thinks there's no way ari and datisi can be town here. this aggressive posturing feels a bit bluff-y to me

In post 843, skitter30 wrote:I dont know what you're asking me, i'm sorry

Pedit @Nordom

In post 841, Nordom wrote:My point was, why would it matter to comment about people who weren't in the game to comment about them?

In post 732, fua wrote:I want to TR VPB by playstyle but his takes aren't very good.

In post 846, skitter30 wrote:

In post 841, Nordom wrote:My point was, why would it matter to comment about people who weren't in the game to comment about them?

I think something got crossed

You seem to have an expectation that i should be focusing on the inactive players

I'm saying: how am i supposed to know who you consider inactive in the time i wasnt here if i havent read the pages yet to see who did or did not post during that time period

I can comment on whoever whether or not they'll see it, that isnt a problem
Does that make more sense? Otherwise i need you to reword your question because i dont understand what you're asking