Mafiascum.net

I haven't read in a bit

Maybe RH9 cause Pooky tmi

Also cause swapping marci and RH allows RH to push me through marci

Can you be more explicit with that first line?

I'm also not sold on the second, I just don't really think that's the way RH9 thinks about the game.

ie. the quotes for me to reference that TMI RH9

like

i'm not scumreading you for bringing up the game? so i'm confused as to what your point is because i think you think i am for some reason

In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.

In post 723, RH9 wrote:

In post 722, Dwlee99 wrote:@RH9 so you scumread Pooky because Luke said so?

Yeah.
You got me.
It was mainly because of that.

@Faker

I asked if it was an argument for me to be scum, or a complaint for my insistence on using the game as a lens.

In post 817, Faker wrote:

In post 813, Save The Dragons wrote:could be faker and dwlee i think that's where i'm at atm

What changed?

I also don't see why I explicitly flag for you that you are about to get rolled the same exact way you did in D&C again as scum instead of just letting you fall into it. It'd be one thing if you were about to notice. You weren't even close to it.

In post 818, Save The Dragons wrote:i think you're thinking too hard about the D and C game

In post 819, Faker wrote:If that's supposed to be a scumtell, and not the lens through which I am trying to read you, then fucking lmao dude

I don't really know what to tell you. You didn't respond to my question and your response on the substantive counter has been ambiguous.

i didn't answer your question i just made a comment

I could really go all day here if I felt like burning my time. If you're not going to answer the question or respond to the substantive point I'm not going to walk you through anything. I am content to let you lose and have you blame it on others again.

In post 830, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.

In post 723, RH9 wrote:

In post 722, Dwlee99 wrote:@RH9 so you scumread Pooky because Luke said so?

Yeah.
You got me.
It was mainly because of that.

@Faker

Uhhhhh 723 here is strange but I need to revisit the context of the initial read+Luke's so this might take me a minute.

i don't have any say in your game so it's whatever

acting all high and mighty doesn't serve any purpose

And yet I might wind up with a real say in yours. Annoying.

good for you?

Can go weigh in on 830 if you're tired of my condescension, you're not going to succeed in changing my view of you and it's not worth your time to deal with me.

good to know i guess

im starting to flip onto RH9, it could be TMI and he had to come up with a reason, 723 does sound fake

In post 717, RH9 wrote:

In post 700, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.

Why was Pooky in here?

From my PoE.
I TRed Luke and Penguin, leaving behind him.

In post 718, RH9 wrote:

In post 717, RH9 wrote:

In post 700, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.

Why was Pooky in here?

From my PoE.
I TRed Luke and Penguin, leaving behind him.

To be honest, I actually had Penguin in the PoE originally.
However, I would admit that one reason I moved him to a TR was mainly because I trusted Luke's read on Pooky.
As for my TR on Luke, it was that switch from jovial to serious. I know Luke's scumgame and he's not the sort to suddenly change from jovial to serious in one phase.

Contextually this is a better explanation, but I actually find this somewhat persuasive because of the time difference.

There's a 12 minute difference, and I would not be surprised if RH9 realized afterwards that 485 was Penguin posted. Having a townread on him would therefore make no sense, and this is something I think RH9 would feel compelled to fix as scum. It's a bit weird to come back later here as town.

In post 815, Save The Dragons wrote:OTOH RH9 is clearly posting just to post

I did that as Town in Holiday Party, remember.

In post 841, Faker wrote:Contextually this is a better explanation, but I actually find this somewhat persuasive because of the time difference.

There's a 12 minute difference, and I would not be surprised if RH9 realized afterwards that 485 was

before

Penguin posted. Having a townread on him would therefore make no sense, and this is something I think RH9 would feel compelled to fix as scum. It's a bit weird to come back later here as town.

It's NAI.
I do it when I realise that something's wrong with my memory.

Do you have any thoughts I feel like you are mostly deflecting

In post 844, Save The Dragons wrote:Do you have any thoughts I feel like you are mostly deflecting

I do.
I'm still not fully awake.
I'll post them later.

I would like to give my thoughts on some scummy behaviour that I haven't seen yet but want all to be aware off.
In my experience, scum vote in Wall (SGB) before Gate (MD) is resolved.
While this hasn't occurred yet, I can't help but feel that it might happen.
Also, I am unhappy with how NAI things are being treated as AI.

FWIW I came out of this page thinking Dragons is more town. I do buy his explanation around D&C and think he's more likely to persist in his objection in 714 as town. Some of that carries over to 818 but I feel stronger about 714: I had just insisted on my perspective in the post he's quoting and made clear I was not to be dissuaded on that point. I would have expected him to find a way around it or settle for my acknowledgement that the mere possibility of making the swap didn't mean he actually made the swap.

In post 847, Faker wrote:I do buy his explanation around D&C

This isn't clear.

I'm referring to our back and forth about why he was fine with me being so vocal and steering so much of this game, where he chalked the lesson of D&C more to the absence of Dunnstral.

In post 848, Faker wrote:

In post 847, Faker wrote:I do buy his explanation around D&C

This isn't clear.

I'm referring to our back and forth about why he was fine with me being so vocal and steering so much of this game, where he chalked the lesson of D&C more to the absence of Dunnstral.

This is a perfect example why the reasoning in 841 is faulty.
By your logic, I should be SRing you for clarifying.