Mafiascum.net

In post 723, Klick wrote:

PenguinPower
furtiveglance
Malakittens
fireisredsir
Vivax
Andresvmb

petapan
Uncrowned
mastina
Nero Cain
Ausuka
jjh927

Roden
Ydrasse
Lukewarm
Titus
BlueBloodedToffee

Ircher
Something_Smart
RCEnigma

In post 820, Vivax wrote:

In post 817, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 813, Vivax wrote:Why is Andres attitude the way it is from a single remark?

Should I be congratulating you when you take shots at me? Didn’t you call me gullible or did I miss that? My point was simply that I don’t think Nero is Scum, which is a good thing because they’re tough to deal with as Scum. You will have noticed that I didn’t say Nero is difficult to pinpoint as Scum. I would have hedged my remarks quite a bit more if that were the case. Since I didn’t understand what you meant, I asked you to clarify. You can get all upset about it if you want, and not answer, but that doesn’t help me figure out what you are.

I just think you have the attitude of someone who didn't walk into a good situation and vibes with negativity in an environment of logic.

That said, Klick makes it to townleans, and you to scumleans.

In post 826, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 820, Vivax wrote:

In post 817, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 813, Vivax wrote:Why is Andres attitude the way it is from a single remark?

Should I be congratulating you when you take shots at me? Didn’t you call me gullible or did I miss that? My point was simply that I don’t think Nero is Scum, which is a good thing because they’re tough to deal with as Scum. You will have noticed that I didn’t say Nero is difficult to pinpoint as Scum. I would have hedged my remarks quite a bit more if that were the case. Since I didn’t understand what you meant, I asked you to clarify. You can get all upset about it if you want, and not answer, but that doesn’t help me figure out what you are.

I just think you have the attitude of someone who didn't walk into a good situation and vibes with negativity in an environment of logic.

That said, Klick makes it to townleans, and you to scumleans.

The attitude of someone who didn’t walk into a good situation? What does that even mean? Do you want to expand upon that? If I’m understanding you correctly, you think I’m sussing you in an effort to protect Ircher. That’s the argument yeah?

In post 801, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 797, Vivax wrote:

In post 786, Andresvmb wrote:I like Nero for Town. Which is a good thing because fighting Scum!Nero is a horrible experience.

This feels a bit too gullible if they expect Nero to be a challenging scum

Gullible? Haha how?

I expressed that I think Nero is Scum

. I also expressed relief because Nero is a difficult player sink as Scum. And they’re generally abrasive, so I would rather not have to deal with it. I also would add that I think Nero adds to the Town.

But maybe I’m misreading what you’re saying. Do you think Nero is fooling me and is Scum? Like what’s the take?

In post 475, Roden wrote:I don't think Mastina ever responded to me anyway.

In post 485, petapan wrote:the last time i pumped the brakes on an early day 1 ircher wagon he was scum who escaped to get a night action
and his posts when he came back were kind of bad tbh

In post 829, Andresvmb wrote:I don’t SR Nero. I don’t think I’ve ever said that.

In post 825, Vivax wrote:I'm legitimately not sure if this is a very well informed scum or a super good town, because I think the bottom of the reads is very sheepable. Though an update on Andres after the latest input would be appreciated.

In post 832, Vivax wrote:Okay you Ebwoped it, but then you said this

In post 829, Andresvmb wrote:I don’t SR Nero. I don’t think I’ve ever said that.

Dirty backtrack

In post 838, Andresvmb wrote:I made an error typing out my thoughts which I quickly corrected. If you’re going to argue that’s a backtrack, that’s a horrific position to adopt.

In post 835, Klick wrote:If you vote Ircher now maybe we could end it by 35

In post 839, Vivax wrote:

In post 838, Andresvmb wrote:I made an error typing out my thoughts which I quickly corrected. If you’re going to argue that’s a backtrack, that’s a horrific position to adopt.

Regardless, it's an interesting typo. You type way too much around that opinion for my taste, and the mistake is icing on the cake.

In post 843, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 839, Vivax wrote:

In post 838, Andresvmb wrote:I made an error typing out my thoughts which I quickly corrected. If you’re going to argue that’s a backtrack, that’s a horrific position to adopt.

Regardless, it's an interesting typo. You type way too much around that opinion for my taste, and the mistake is icing on the cake.

Hahaha okay. I think you’re Scum doubling down on a bad take. But I’ll stop arguing with you directly.

In post 788, jjh927 wrote:

In post 785, Lukewarm wrote:I don't really have a read on Mastina atm, but I don't think it is true to say that scum mastina would not lie about her productivity levels.

Why would she lock herself into it before the night phase has even begun?

In post 708, Ausuka wrote:I want to be cautious with Vivax because he seems like the sort of person who's naturally scummy but I don't really like the way he pivots away from Ircher for being too scummy to be scum and then returns because apparently he'd be hammered if he's town??? Especially with Ircher voting Vivax, I feel like if Ircher is scum Vivax is a good place to start d2

In post 744, Ircher wrote:I read through mastina's ISO. Incredibly wrong reads as always.

In post 666, fireisredsir wrote:i don't really get the mindset behind "hammer or move on" followed by "i want to vote RCE but don't want to dampen ircher wagon"

can you explain that more

specifically about the "or move on"

In post 847, mastina wrote:

In post 744, Ircher wrote:I read through mastina's ISO. Incredibly wrong reads as always.

This is not a town-Ircher post.