Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:55 pm
It might actually be better than a case from someone I'm inclined to accept at face value, FB.
Can you specify what you mean here? I know I said this but I don't remember the context.In post 8463, Dandelion Wine wrote:LLD when you come back can you let me know if you're still feeling the peta scumread given what all went down, and also if you are kind of break down more the whole "playing politics" thing you mentioned?
if u want a case that probably won't convince u of anything. sure i can case spiffeh.In post 8475, Deacon Blues wrote:It might actually be better than a case from someone I'm inclined to accept at face value, FB.
This post.In post 8242, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:think of peta as a politicianIn post 8237, Deacon Blues wrote:i literally have not fucking posted in the hood i think in over a dayIn post 8234, petapan wrote:hydra discussion or pt discussio
i've made probably 50 posts here in that time
I reserve the right to talk to my hydra partner as much as i fucking want lol. I'm not using it as a crutch and the constant insinuation that we're being cryptic in the here and now despite us having a fucking billion posts here is just not based in any kind of reality and i'm not having it
-b
that's his talking point
it's what's winning him shit
he will keep hammering you and ffery and cabd and ceph with it
and i will take the blame for this cause i hit y'all up with the gambit yesterday
but now you can see they keep saying it to reduce your ability to do shit
FB are you still gonna do peta with me today.In post 8477, Firebringer wrote:if u want a case that probably won't convince u of anything. sure i can case spiffeh.In post 8475, Deacon Blues wrote:It might actually be better than a case from someone I'm inclined to accept at face value, FB.
Yes i will still do it.In post 8479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:FB are you still gonna do peta with me today.In post 8477, Firebringer wrote:if u want a case that probably won't convince u of anything. sure i can case spiffeh.In post 8475, Deacon Blues wrote:It might actually be better than a case from someone I'm inclined to accept at face value, FB.
I obviously need to convince one other person either way, but, I need your vote tbh.
In post 8473, Dandelion Wine wrote:cmd shutdown -r /f
Okay, in the mean time I'm also interested in your thoughts on Spiffeh.In post 8481, Firebringer wrote:Yes i will still do it.In post 8479, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:FB are you still gonna do peta with me today.In post 8477, Firebringer wrote:if u want a case that probably won't convince u of anything. sure i can case spiffeh.In post 8475, Deacon Blues wrote:It might actually be better than a case from someone I'm inclined to accept at face value, FB.
I obviously need to convince one other person either way, but, I need your vote tbh.
UNVOTE: petapanIn post 8485, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Okay, in the mean time I'm also interested in your thoughts on Spiffeh.
So can you put your vote on Peta and start work on that?
No, this is a good thing. Full reset on my mental processor.
Hella fellow /r/neoliberal shill!In post 8487, Firebringer wrote:how nations fall
did u read the book?In post 8489, Dandelion Wine wrote:Hella fellow /r/neoliberal shill!In post 8487, Firebringer wrote:how nations fall
You're actually talking about "Why Nations Fail" yeah?In post 8490, Firebringer wrote:did u read the book?In post 8489, Dandelion Wine wrote:Hella fellow /r/neoliberal shill!In post 8487, Firebringer wrote:how nations fall
So, what I meant here is that Peta gets to keep sayign things that discredit our reads and make us look worse and when we hammer back with the work you two did in the neighbourhoods, you guys get hit with the "lul more ineffective and cryptic neighbour shit" which permiated the thread as a culture and shuts it down.In post 8478, Dandelion Wine wrote:This post.In post 8242, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:think of peta as a politicianIn post 8237, Deacon Blues wrote:i literally have not fucking posted in the hood i think in over a dayIn post 8234, petapan wrote:hydra discussion or pt discussio
i've made probably 50 posts here in that time
I reserve the right to talk to my hydra partner as much as i fucking want lol. I'm not using it as a crutch and the constant insinuation that we're being cryptic in the here and now despite us having a fucking billion posts here is just not based in any kind of reality and i'm not having it
-b
that's his talking point
it's what's winning him shit
he will keep hammering you and ffery and cabd and ceph with it
and i will take the blame for this cause i hit y'all up with the gambit yesterday
but now you can see they keep saying it to reduce your ability to do shit
My father in law has a copy, I've read a bit of it over there but have not really completed it. That said, it's kind of a meme on the neoliberal subreddit and it's on my to-do list to finish this year.In post 8492, Firebringer wrote:Yes
Thanks. I'm gonna ruminate on this take while I subject myself to the day three ISO re-read I promised myself.In post 8493, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:So, what I meant here is that Peta gets to keep sayign things that discredit our reads and make us look worse and when we hammer back with the work you two did in the neighbourhoods, you guys get hit with the "lul more ineffective and cryptic neighbour shit" which permiated the thread as a culture and shuts it down.In post 8478, Dandelion Wine wrote:This post.In post 8242, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:think of peta as a politicianIn post 8237, Deacon Blues wrote:i literally have not fucking posted in the hood i think in over a dayIn post 8234, petapan wrote:hydra discussion or pt discussio
i've made probably 50 posts here in that time
I reserve the right to talk to my hydra partner as much as i fucking want lol. I'm not using it as a crutch and the constant insinuation that we're being cryptic in the here and now despite us having a fucking billion posts here is just not based in any kind of reality and i'm not having it
-b
that's his talking point
it's what's winning him shit
he will keep hammering you and ffery and cabd and ceph with it
and i will take the blame for this cause i hit y'all up with the gambit yesterday
but now you can see they keep saying it to reduce your ability to do shit
Essentially, he's a politician who doesn't need to actually address your policy if he can just smear you and deflect the rest as a result.
and that's been his thing. Lightly calling all 3 of you me and deacon scum while still keeping his neutrality to look more "townie".
Focusing on posts that are designed to look good and contemplative over effective and pushing anything.
Have you noticed Peta hasn't DONE anything? he's mitch in the senate
and anytime someone hits him, it's defended agaisnt with these statements that frustrate you so much
I mean, look at how he did the mason stuff with me, right?
it looked super townie for him and shut me down and if i wasn't a stubborn bitch about shit, it probably would have gotten blown over wrt his claim, right?
he keeps saying "we can't trust the setup spec" to prime the thread but he has recently done setup spec himself. Why? because it's not "we can't trust setup spec" it's "We can't trust setup spec that puts me in a bad spot".
Peta is bobbing and weaving like a politician and playing us like fiddles while doing it.
he's impressive and competent, and you should give him that benefit of the doutb when you gut says town
cause he knows how to look town, but his actions stink to high hell
You me and Deacon.In post 8496, Dandelion Wine wrote:Oh, one additional question. Who all is the "our" in "Peta gets to keep sayign things that discredit our reads "?
Let's say it is for now.