Posted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 5:27 am
EBWOP: I could think of either charter or Tajo as infected. (Then the Tubby stuff)
So basically you think tajo was recruited every night? Seems more like you're trying to lynch tajo than actually figure this out to me.Kelly Chen wrote:If we're looking for a N1 recruit, I say it's limited to pop, tubby, or Rally. But I'm thinking pop was the obvious recruitment, and scum just went ahead and grabbed him doc be damned.
I mean look at who the scum were: fallen, malthusis, and Mokina ('s vacant position). Do you think these guys were thinking how to outguess the doc?
As for last night, pop also seems like an obvious pick. You can't really base a case on that (and I think scum expect that), but I feel better about it than saying pop was scum yesterday.
/intend to vote pop.
Hm, i probably shouldn't post late at night. I didn't realize this at the time, but you're right, all 3 original scum have been lynched or suicided already. The idea behind my post was to give us more time to figure out who was infected last night by attempting to lynch one of our earlier suspects.charter wrote:I shouldn't argue for my own lynch, but someone else will point this out, but why would you lynch someone besides who you think got infected? I think it's unlikely any original scums are left since ani died. And you can't let someone you think is infected alive until night.veerus wrote:well, i'd be ok with a KC or tubby lynch today... i think its pretty obvious that either charter or tajo got infected last night.. personally my money would be on charter (he's been more active and his reads have been spot on). if we lynch kc or tubby, it'll give us more time to determine who got infected between tajo/charter.
This was the pebble that started the avalanche. Charter had been pretty townie up to that point and was leading a very strong case on mokina/replacement/aminoph and for you to put him in both original and recruited categories looks really bad (especially in hindsight).Kelly Chen wrote:I reskimmed a few people and I am going to completely flip-flop.
unvote, vote: Shotty
Much better bet I think.
Here's the breakdown I came up with:
Maybe original: charter, mokina/rplcmt, shotty, veerus, kise?
Maybe recruited: charter, pop, rally, shotty
Believe to be neither atm: me, bm, kid
seemed like the right thing to do at the time i wasn't expecting a speed lynch, by time i got back to the thread shotty was deadRally Vincent wrote:My prime suspect for today is tubby, though. Tubby, why did you vote for Shotty?
Yes, but why exactly?tubby216 wrote:seemed like the right thing to do at the time i wasn't expecting a speed lynch, by time i got back to the thread shotty was deadRally Vincent wrote:My prime suspect for today is tubby, though. Tubby, why did you vote for Shotty?
cause at the time i was second guessing my reads and decided to go along with charterRally Vincent wrote:Yes, but why exactly?tubby216 wrote:seemed like the right thing to do at the time i wasn't expecting a speed lynch, by time i got back to the thread shotty was deadRally Vincent wrote:My prime suspect for today is tubby, though. Tubby, why did you vote for Shotty?
I don't think moving my vote from charter to Shotty started an avalanche, except of people questioning my categories...veerus wrote:This was the pebble that started the avalanche. Charter had been pretty townie up to that point and was leading a very strong case on mokina/replacement/aminoph and for you to put him in both original and recruited categories looks really bad (especially in hindsight).Kelly Chen wrote:I reskimmed a few people and I am going to completely flip-flop.
unvote, vote: Shotty
Much better bet I think.
Here's the breakdown I came up with:
Maybe original: charter, mokina/rplcmt, shotty, veerus, kise?
Maybe recruited: charter, pop, rally, shotty
Believe to be neither atm: me, bm, kid
vote: KC
charter's not scum, unless he was just now recruited. But that seems unlikely due to yesterday's misfortune.Rally Vincent wrote:Are you still hiding behind charter no matter what? Charter was really in a hurry to lynch Shotty yesterday. Of course, others - including me - weren't hesitating either, but it should be at least worth a look. Even more since he is one of your suspects.
The point of my post was not that charter is scum, but veerus voting with charter, although charter is his most-likely-to-be-infected. Why would you someone do that?Kelly Chen wrote:charter's not scum, unless he was just now recruited. But that seems unlikely due to yesterday's misfortune.Rally Vincent wrote:Are you still hiding behind charter no matter what? Charter was really in a hurry to lynch Shotty yesterday. Of course, others - including me - weren't hesitating either, but it should be at least worth a look. Even more since he is one of your suspects.
Yes, OR it could help us claim that somebody else is still original scumpopulartajo wrote:Also, thoughts on Mokina original scum or infected at night? This could become important in our guessing of the number or original infected.
Charter is the most-likely-infected for veerus, as he said - regardless if you or me think charter is. Since we had two suicides, that equals that for veerus charter is most likely scum. I fail to see why he has to vote for the same player charter does if he thinks charter is scum. Doesn't make sense.Kelly Chen wrote:Yeah but charter being in a hurry to lynch Shotty doesn't seem relevant to veerus' theory for charterscum.
why?charter wrote:Replacement/Mokina was pretty clearly original scum. I explained why back on day two.
tajo, I'd vote you because you would have been one of my top infection choices last night.
No, why would I have been a top infection choice last night?charter wrote:http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 19#1805219
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 2#1805222c
I agree with Rally about veerus making even less sense than usual today, however, I'm not seeing scum off him currently.