Mafiascum.net

Wtf they DREW the last match? How the fuck does that happen?!

Oh wow way to be totally anti-wincon Maestro.

Also Voided is mafia because he's never won a game ergo I am going to vote him to ensure that continues to not happen.

Causing Voided to be 0 for 4 sounds like a great way to round out the game!

In post 854, Syryana wrote:Causing Voided to be 0 for 4 sounds like a great way to round out the game!

...

......

......that hurts, dude...

Aww, Voided.

Now I want to vote Majiffy just to let you win.

In post 855, Voidedmafia wrote:

In post 854, Syryana wrote:Causing Voided to be 0 for 4 sounds like a great way to round out the game!

...

......

......that hurts, dude...

<3

I may have forgotten about this game. Judging by the lack of outrage, I can only assume you two did as well.

VOTE: Syryana

Might as well get it over with.

In post 859, Majiffy wrote:VOTE: Syryana

Might as well get it over with.

Not winning 3 games in a row does that to your willingness to play.

Welp, that proves to me who the other town is

VOTE: Majiffy

I hope for your sake you make the right choice this time Voided

With my luck, probly not <_<

Don't like Majiffy for the way he sounds in admonishing Maestro. Sounds to me more like scum more angry at another scum at not winning than someone who's annoyed at the NL.

Can't call either of you scummy for wanting me to go 0-4 (but I will call you meanie-heads), though I don't know why Majiffy didn't actually vote me to ensure I didn't win again.

@859: Hey, only I get to play the "I give up" card here. Both of you have at least one win as either alignment.

Probly will vote Majiffy.

In post 863, Voidedmafia wrote:Don't like Majiffy for the way he sounds in admonishing Maestro. Sounds to me more like scum more angry at another scum at not winning than someone who's annoyed at the NL.

Uh... wut? You realize it doesn't affect me if he wins or loses, regardless of my alignment, right?

In post 863, Voidedmafia wrote: Can't call either of you scummy for wanting me to go 0-4 (but I will call you meanie-heads), though I don't know why Majiffy didn't actually vote me to ensure I didn't win again.

Because I saw a Syr post I didn't like. I'll quote it after this post.

In post 856, Syryana wrote:Aww, Voided.

Now I want to vote Majiffy just to let you win.

This.

In post 864, Majiffy wrote:Uh... wut? You realize it doesn't affect me if he wins or loses, regardless of my alignment, right?

That's not really what I said. As scum you may have felt more annoyed that maestro let it go to a NL than if you were town, and could have posted in such a way to unintentionally convey this.

As for the Syr quote, you said something similar to the inverse (voting me to insure that I didn't win). What's the difference between hers and yours?

... But would I feel annoyed about that? I refer you back to my original point of last game's outcome having no effect on me.

Mine was a joke. Hers doesn't feel that way; the tone is all wrong.

Here we go again with people not posting. What is it with you two?

Why haven't you elaborated on what's "all wrong" about the tone of my post, Jiffy?

Looks like subtle appeasement / trying to ease in a vote. Manipulative.

In post 861, Syryana wrote:I hope for your sake you make the right choice this time Voided

And for what it's worth, this is more manipulation.

Man, I didn't realize what a manipulative bastard I was.

Truth hurts.

Yeah