This is obviously false bc when you were commenting on how new i was to MS the reason why it was being discussed because i made a post that said "even if you shoot all three scum" and they were trying to figure out if it was intentional or not--- in reality. This was obviously discussed already and you were part of that discussion. That was early game when i wasnt thinking about how many scum there were and had nothing to do if i was new or not but rather had more to do with me not thinking through my posts--- you were there for that--- how can you feign ignorance? and blatently pointing it out repeatedly is a sign that it was intentionally inserted
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 9:59 am
by fuzzybutternut
Because I remember that.
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 10:01 am
by JasonWazza
*smacks fuzzy round the head with the butt of my gun*
It's called gambiting which is the only way scum win in this scenario. Irony, since you already demonstrated that you know why scum wants attention on them in your first post. Another fake towntell.
want the gun right now. I have no idea who is scum, and I don't want to kill someone who doesn't deserve to die.
Wait, didn't you just have a reads list? Didn't you want to shoot srand before? Or me? Or Ineffective? Now you don't want the gun even though you said you did twice? You're scum scared he's getting shot.
This is just gut, though. If I the gun, i'd shoot RP, then if I kept the gun, I'd shoot Rach.
Now you know who you want to shoot again because you don't think you'll be shot.
In post 572, fuzzybutternut wrote:No, that was me taking back my scum read on Minimal before the flip.
Pretty sure redpanda is scum.
RedPanda isn't scum.
In post 584, fuzzybutternut wrote:Post 412 makes me think he was happy with delaying the gunshot.
He also called me town. Scum does that more often than town does.
Tldr: He wanted the gun at the start which was proved to be fake bravado when he thought he might actually be shot. His reason for not wanting the gun was ludicrous. After Jason popped town, he tried to do everything in his power to townslip.
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 11:15 am
by fuzzybutternut
Sure sure.
Jason pistol whipped me. Lol
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 11:38 am
by Ineffective
Mfw fuzzy didnt even get knocked unconcious
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 12:24 pm
by fuzzybutternut
Btw, Syr, I didn't even read whatever that spoiler was.
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 1:03 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 821, JasonWazza wrote:The fact you didn't just do that automatically seems scummy, you realize that right?
if you shoot syryana i'll gut you
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 1:11 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 851, JasonWazza wrote:btw just so everyone is aware, if i shoot fuzzy and he flips scum i will instantaneously shoot my highest scum read.
I don't care how annoying that is.
if your highest scumread is ineffective, i guess i don't care
In post 851, JasonWazza wrote:btw just so everyone is aware, if i shoot fuzzy and he flips scum i will instantaneously shoot my highest scum read.
I don't care how annoying that is.
if your highest scumread is ineffective, i guess i don't care
Wait youd really rather see me shot over rach?
Also... If fuzzy is scum and you are town you shouldnt really care who is shot after fuzzy... Bc if you arnt shot its auto and i dont think anyone would shoot you
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 1:18 pm
by Ineffective
Also that post gives me pause bc i feel like you are fishing for his highest scumread
Also... If fuzzy is scum and you are town you shouldnt really care who is shot after fuzzy... Bc if you arnt shot its auto and i dont think anyone would shoot you
Yes, I would. Because Rach is a townread of mine and I would rather a townread die than a townread who's lost a bit of that faith. And I will always care who is shot. If I didn't, there would be no reason for me to be playing this game, right?
In post 869, Ineffective wrote:Also that post gives me pause bc i feel like you are fishing for his highest scumread
Why does that give you pause?
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 3:46 pm
by Nachomamma8
In post 750, Syryana wrote:I'm in favor of shooting one of the top two moreso than Jason since we just nailed scum and we're 6v3.
This pushes Syryana higher up into my townreads, considering that the other two are probably both scum.
In post 747, Ineffective wrote:His actions seem like agressive town... But you shot right last time....
I thought Jason was a townread. Why didn't you defend him?
i did in an apathetic way... I was kinda disheartened from defending ffer and having her flip scum--- wasnt confident in my ability to accurately read town--- and have had heaps of other frustrations in a couple other games--- also i didnt townread catlord(his slot) in the least--- so i wasnt about to defend that slot too hard considering i could be wrong very easily--- so i just posted my impression and left it at that
Why did one townread flipping wrong completely dishearten you?
Why did you take the word "kinda" and replace it for "completely"????
Rhetoric benefit.
In post 798, Ineffective wrote:EG me as town is active if finding and lynching scum when i am in good mental fitness
Me as scum is active in lynching and decieving townies when i am in good mental fitness
Me as a player on this site has had a few games that have turned sour on me and me as a player had a slump for a day. I cannot specifically reference ongoing games but i think you will find a couple examples of this if you look
You're panicking a little bit. Why?
In post 823, Ineffective wrote:Im gunna ISO fuzzy and revisit all the posts that alarmed me--- if you shoot anyone but fuzzy i will be really confused
Why the aggressive push to fuzzy so suddenly?
In post 830, JasonWazza wrote:Fuzzy make a compelling case as to why i shouldn't shoot you
@ everyone else, i am giving 24 hours before i shoot, say whatever you need to say.
Please don't hipfire after you shoot fuzzy. We can take time with this and it won't hurt you any.
In post 832, fuzzybutternut wrote:Compelling case?
Umm, I don't know who scum is, and I don't want to be shot. I'd like for you to survive, also.
I would say try harder than this, but.
In post 847, fuzzybutternut wrote:What you call "universally indicative of scum posting" is actually not.
Stop scum raging. You called it an implied admittance that I was scum, and it wasn't.
