Mafiascum.net

Bulba is almost confirmed scum in the eyes of head #2


Go read Macs posts in that Goonies scum QT and tell me what sticks out


go ahead. i'll wait here.

And the whole thing about "why are they worried about getting lynched" is taking a throwaway joke a little too seriously. I've been asked to tell you that scum would be too afraid to NK that which is unknown to them.

In post 846, StubbsKVM wrote:Rift Adrift and Crab make some good points on Shadi's gameplay. I'm not convinced he's town yet, but I think there are better options for now.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dramonic

Back to the dead weight.

I'm not dead-weight, I just don't put any faith in Day 1.

In post 847, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:

In post 845, Rift Adrift wrote:@Orcinus

What do you think of BulbaFenix?

Are you ignoring my opinion of Shadi's alignment?

Not really thinking about them right now

Your areas of focus kinda worry me.

And no I'm not ignoring it, and if you'd like I'll acknowledge its existence right now

So does this.

In post 848, BulbaFenix wrote:

In post 834, KingCrabd wrote:Bulba, Prohawk and I have extensive offsite meta together. However, It's been town/town meta offsite exclusively. He also followed (and did not play in) a game where I was scum. As for the other head, he's been scum with prohawk, so there's that.

What's your other head saying about Prohawk right now, King?

-Fenix

Null-ish at best, his efforts at contribution have the same ring to them as his scum game with me, but not quite to the extent I'd need to see to declare it his scum game.

In post 850, Serene wrote:Bulba is almost confirmed scum in the eyes of head #2


Go read Macs posts in that Goonies scum QT and tell me what sticks out


go ahead. i'll wait here.

Here's the entirety of Mac's posts there:

I am ALWAYS mafia now, its getting ridiculous

Who is my partner?

What's up Aafter. What do you think we should go for as a strategy?

Selkies is a good NK shout purely because orcinus is good and fferyl is good and together they're probably shit hot at hunting. I'm trying not to lurk. I'm focused on other games atm which both will understand.

Yeah, it's drew FuDu in too. I think he could be lynched today.

My POV is you're talking about that last line, but since you aren't explaining it I could be wrong.

First line and his replace out.

In post 856, Zdenek wrote:First line and his replace out.

Ah.

Eh. I don't really see that as alignment indicative. Mac isn't the type of player that would wreck all their games by replacing out ONLY as scum, is he? Because that's not at all the impression I'm getting from a quick metaskim.

In post 811, Cabd wrote:

@Mod, we appear to have lost quite a few posts.

In post 852, dramonic wrote:

In post 846, StubbsKVM wrote:Rift Adrift and Crab make some good points on Shadi's gameplay. I'm not convinced he's town yet, but I think there are better options for now.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Dramonic

Back to the dead weight.

I'm not dead-weight, I just don't put any faith in Day 1.

So you're dead weight on day 1, at least

dire. i made a 2000 word post summarising my reads, pity the server got rid of them.

well, i guess there's not much more i can do.

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:Post #10 was really bad, as has been repeatedly explained. However, I can understand why people are hesitant to use that as their only reasoning.

Well screw you bud.

SO wait... bad like scum bad?

Bad like idiotic bad?

Bad like you are scum and can't ignore my post so must comment and take the side of the majority?

or

Bad like baaaad man. That idea rocks?

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:They have a slimy quality to them, and it feels as if he's trying to manipulate people when he addresses them so that they say something that he can attack as scummy. He's scum and needs to be lynched as soon as possible. I'll be addressing some of his posts soon.

Humm... I think I have been accused of this before... yeah!

Anyway...

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
It's interesting that you're insinuating that Crabd is scum via meta when you haven't even looked up his meta.

Your assumption here makes look the fool. It's bad and you should feel bad.

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
Your subtlety here is almost admirable. You really want that BRO mislynch, don't you. I also like how you make sure that you mention it was someone else's idea, since you could just point to that later should BRO flip town.

I wasn't being subtle, but ok... I don't often take credit for others ideas ; do you?

Also, this sounds eerily like you know what BRO would flip... why is that? Your rationale of why he is town consists of: He is doing genuine scum-hunting and the things he has done aren't scummy (In your opinion). Because scum would never genuinely hunt-scum. Amirite? Scum could never not do something scummy.

In post 849, Serene wrote:How cute. Bulba starts calling us scum after the site deleted our post where i referred to him as scum.

That's cute. Because, if you actually read that huge post where Bulba came in and posted, you are null. Bulba head wanted you as null/town, I'm the one who has the feeling that you are scummy.

Serene wrote:Bulba is almost confirmed scum in the eyes of head #2


Go read Macs posts in that Goonies scum QT and tell me what sticks out


go ahead. i'll wait here.

. Still pushing that Gambler's Fallacy, eh? Cute.

ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:Post #10 was really bad, as has been repeatedly explained. However, I can understand why people are hesitant to use that as their only reasoning.

Well screw you bud.

SO wait... bad like scum bad?

Bad like idiotic bad?

Bad like you are scum and can't ignore my post so must comment and take the side of the majority?

or

Bad like baaaad man. That idea rocks?

ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:They have a slimy quality to them, and it feels as if he's trying to manipulate people when he addresses them so that they say something that he can attack as scummy. He's scum and needs to be lynched as soon as possible. I'll be addressing some of his posts soon.

Humm... I think I have been accused of this before... yeah!

Anyway...

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
It's interesting that you're insinuating that Crabd is scum via meta when you haven't even looked up his meta.

Your assumption here makes

you

look the fool. It's bad and you should feel bad.

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
Your subtlety here is almost admirable. You really want that BRO mislynch, don't you. I also like how you make sure that you mention it was someone else's idea, since you could just point to that later should BRO flip town.

I wasn't being subtle, but ok... I don't often take credit for others ideas ; do you?

Also, this sounds eerily like you know what BRO would flip... why is that? Your rationale of why he is town consists of: He is doing genuine scum-hunting and the things he has done aren't scummy (In your opinion). Because scum would never genuinely hunt-scum. Amirite? Scum could never not do something scummy.

I'm getting off the phone with Bulba now... He's at the library... Here's your headstart to run....

-Fenix

In post 835, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:What 'fishy wagons'

The ones on TIP and Calcifer and your jump on Shadi.

In post 836, Shadi1337 wrote:Lold @ ur read on me Bulba sounds confused.

It is.

In post 836, Shadi1337 wrote: He's being anti-town but so anti-town that he could just be town.

I dislike the "too scummy to be scum" fallacy. Just so ya know.

In post 849, Serene wrote:How cute. Bulba starts calling us scum after the site deleted our post where i referred to him as scum.

My 3DS was unable to connect to the site during the weekend, and obviously a lot of things that I cannot see or respond to were lost. It's hard to react to something that does not exist.

In post 850, Serene wrote:Bulba is almost confirmed scum in the eyes of head #2


Go read Macs posts in that Goonies scum QT and tell me what sticks out


go ahead. i'll wait here.

Please read Mac's handful of quotes in this game and give me your thoughts. Better yet, give me your thoughts on our posts so far this game.

go ahead. I'll wait here.

In post 851, Serene wrote:And the whole thing about "why are they worried about getting lynched" is taking a throwaway joke a little too seriously. I've been asked to tell you that scum would be too afraid to NK that which is unknown to them.

You're seriously suggesting that scum would want to take the risk of leaving an unknown factor in play? Are you high?

In post 852, dramonic wrote: I'm not dead-weight, I just don't put any faith in Day 1.

That's too bad. There tends to be a lot of good stuff d1.

In post 861, Nero wrote:dire. i made a 2000 word post summarising my reads, pity the server got rid of them.

You can always make yourself useful and retype it. I'll wait.

In post 863, ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:Post #10 was really bad, as has been repeatedly explained. However, I can understand why people are hesitant to use that as their only reasoning.

Well screw you bud.

SO wait... bad like scum bad?

Bad like idiotic bad?

Bad like you are scum and can't ignore my post so must comment and take the side of the majority?

or

Bad like baaaad man. That idea rocks?

My meaning was obvious given the context. However, since you lack the basic reading comprehension necessary, I'll reiterate: Incredibly scummy bad and must be lynched ASAP. Do you really want to get into a game of semantics with the writer?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:They have a slimy quality to them, and it feels as if he's trying to manipulate people when he addresses them so that they say something that he can attack as scummy. He's scum and needs to be lynched as soon as possible. I'll be addressing some of his posts soon.

Humm... I think I have been accused of this before... yeah!

Using someone else's meta against me does not impress me in the slightest. Do you actually want to discuss my point, or are you simply wasting my time?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
It's interesting that you're insinuating that Crabd is scum via meta when you haven't even looked up his meta.

Your assumption here makes

you

look the fool. It's bad and you should feel bad.

What was your point then? Saying I'm stupid does absolutely nothing if you don't explain your original premise. Or was the point here simply to discredit me?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
Your subtlety here is almost admirable. You really want that BRO mislynch, don't you. I also like how you make sure that you mention it was someone else's idea, since you could just point to that later should BRO flip town.

I wasn't being subtle

You weren't. Ok, I now know what your shouting voice looks like.

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: but ok... I don't often take credit for others ideas ; do you?

Saying that it was somebody else's idea gave you an out. It's not exactly like "BROseidon needs more attention paid to him" is such an original idea anyway...

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: Also, this sounds eerily like you know what BRO would flip... why is that?

Yes, because "should" indicates my obvious knowledge of his alignment.

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: Because scum would never genuinely hunt-scum. Amirite? Scum could never not do something scummy.

That's misrepresenting my position. There's a difference between how town scum hunts and how scum "scum hunts", mainly the fact that scum is pretending to do so while town is genuine in their pursuits. As such, there should be ways to tell the 2 apart. I get the distinct impression that BRO is genuine in his attempts to find scum, and it shows in how he pursues suspects and types his posts.

Also, the only way scum would ever genuinely scum hunt would be if this was multi-ball and they were searching for another scum team. Are you suggesting that this is the case?

I also find it interesting that you start posting up a storm right after I call you scum. Speaking of which, Dramonic is getting the attention he deserves.




-Bulba

In post 866, BulbaFenix wrote:

In post 835, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:What 'fishy wagons'

The ones on TIP and Calcifer and your jump on Shadi.

In post 836, Shadi1337 wrote:Lold @ ur read on me Bulba sounds confused.

It is.

In post 836, Shadi1337 wrote: He's being anti-town but so anti-town that he could just be town.

I dislike the "too scummy to be scum" fallacy. Just so ya know.

In post 849, Serene wrote:How cute. Bulba starts calling us scum after the site deleted our post where i referred to him as scum.

My 3DS was unable to connect to the site during the weekend, and obviously a lot of things that I cannot see or respond to were lost. It's hard to react to something that does not exist.

In post 850, Serene wrote:Bulba is almost confirmed scum in the eyes of head #2


Go read Macs posts in that Goonies scum QT and tell me what sticks out


go ahead. i'll wait here.

Please read Mac's handful of quotes in this game and give me your thoughts. Better yet, give me your thoughts on our posts so far this game.

go ahead. I'll wait here.

In post 851, Serene wrote:And the whole thing about "why are they worried about getting lynched" is taking a throwaway joke a little too seriously. I've been asked to tell you that scum would be too afraid to NK that which is unknown to them.

You're seriously suggesting that scum would want to take the risk of leaving an unknown factor in play? Are you high?

In post 852, dramonic wrote: I'm not dead-weight, I just don't put any faith in Day 1.

That's too bad. There tends to be a lot of good stuff d1.

In post 861, Nero wrote:dire. i made a 2000 word post summarising my reads, pity the server got rid of them.

You can always make yourself useful and retype it. I'll wait.

In post 863, ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:Post #10 was really bad, as has been repeatedly explained. However, I can understand why people are hesitant to use that as their only reasoning.

Well screw you bud.

SO wait... bad like scum bad?

Bad like idiotic bad?

Bad like you are scum and can't ignore my post so must comment and take the side of the majority?

or

Bad like baaaad man. That idea rocks?

My meaning was obvious given the context. However, since you lack the basic reading comprehension necessary, I'll reiterate: Incredibly scummy bad and must be lynched ASAP. Do you really want to get into a game of semantics with the writer?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 832, BulbaFenix wrote:They have a slimy quality to them, and it feels as if he's trying to manipulate people when he addresses them so that they say something that he can attack as scummy. He's scum and needs to be lynched as soon as possible. I'll be addressing some of his posts soon.

Humm... I think I have been accused of this before... yeah!

Using someone else's meta against me does not impress me in the slightest. Do you actually want to discuss my point, or are you simply wasting my time?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
It's interesting that you're insinuating that Crabd is scum via meta when you haven't even looked up his meta.

Your assumption here makes

you

look the fool. It's bad and you should feel bad.

What was your point then? Saying I'm stupid does absolutely nothing if you don't explain your original premise. Or was the point here simply to discredit me?

In post 864, ProHawk wrote:

In post 833, BulbaFenix wrote:
Your subtlety here is almost admirable. You really want that BRO mislynch, don't you. I also like how you make sure that you mention it was someone else's idea, since you could just point to that later should BRO flip town.

I wasn't being subtle

You weren't. Ok, I now know what your shouting voice looks like.

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: but ok... I don't often take credit for others ideas ; do you?

Saying that it was somebody else's idea gave you an out. It's not exactly like "BROseidon needs more attention paid to him" is such an original idea anyway...

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: Also, this sounds eerily like you know what BRO would flip... why is that?

Yes, because "should" indicates my obvious knowledge of his alignment.

In post 864, ProHawk wrote: Because scum would never genuinely hunt-scum. Amirite? Scum could never not do something scummy.

That's misrepresenting my position. There's a difference between how town scum hunts and how scum "scum hunts", mainly the fact that scum is pretending to do so while town is genuine in their pursuits. As such, there should be ways to tell the 2 apart. I get the distinct impression that BRO is genuine in his attempts to find scum, and it shows in how he pursues suspects and types his posts.

Also, the only way scum would ever genuinely scum hunt would be if this was multi-ball and they were searching for another scum team. Are you suggesting that this is the case?

I also find it interesting that you start posting up a storm right after I call you scum. Speaking of which, Dramonic is getting the attention he deserves.

Unvote

Vote Dramonic

-Bulba

This is a confusing post.

I liked them better when they were bussing.

why the fuck would you quote a wall posted directly above you to write a one-liner.

In post 865, BulbaFenix wrote:That's cute. Because, if you actually read that huge post where Bulba came in and posted, you are null. Bulba head wanted you as null/town, I'm the one who has the feeling that you are scummy.

Your heads are so indistinguishable that I couldn't care less which one said what.

In post 865, BulbaFenix wrote:. Still pushing that Gambler's Fallacy, eh? Cute.

It's not a Gambler's Fallacy.

Mac said he was tired of rolling scum IN A GAME WHERE HE REPLACED OUT AS SCUM.

Therefore, his replacing out of THIS game while he continues to join OTHER games is absolutely significant.

In post 867, Rift Adrift wrote: This is a confusing post.

What about it do you find confusing?

In post 870, Serene wrote:

In post 865, BulbaFenix wrote:That's cute. Because, if you actually read that huge post where Bulba came in and posted, you are null. Bulba head wanted you as null/town, I'm the one who has the feeling that you are scummy.

Your heads are so indistinguishable that I couldn't care less which one said what.

That's probably the funniest thing I've heard all day. Were you actually trying to dispute something or simply posting gibberish?

In post 871, Serene wrote:

In post 865, BulbaFenix wrote:. Still pushing that Gambler's Fallacy, eh? Cute.

It's not a Gambler's Fallacy.

Mac said he was tired of rolling scum IN A GAME WHERE HE REPLACED OUT AS SCUM.

Therefore, his replacing out of THIS game while he continues to join OTHER games is absolutely significant.

Really? Because I find it to be null. How are you coming with that post analysis I asked of you?

-Bulba

This should be good. Do tell?