Mafiascum.net

b

In post 849, morph the cat wrote:GiF get in here and talk.

To be honest, I'm quite de-synced from this game after last weekend. (At least I learned why the de-sync happens to me time to time.)
It's gonna take some time for me to recover, so wait til then.
I promise that I'll get back on the pace before this weekend.

In post 821, MafiaSSK wrote:I love how people be hatin on the lurkers.

In post 831, pieguyn wrote:can you explain the "play based" vs. "read based"? I don't understand what you mean here.

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

If you compare it to her posts in Xenoblade you'll see the same kind of snark and put down toward people scum reading her. So much so she could have copy/pasted from that game and had essentially the same post.

In post 851, Psychlone wrote:

In post 849, morph the cat wrote:GiF get in here and talk.

To be honest, I'm quite de-synced from this game after last weekend.

Really?

In post 855, waynegg wrote:

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

If you compare it to her posts in Xenoblade you'll see the same kind of snark and put down toward people scum reading her. So much so she could have copy/pasted from that game and had essentially the same post.

Heh, I probably snark more and with less provocation as town, but the nature of the snark is different. Nacho pointed out the difference to me during a recent game. To the extent I can avoid it, I won't be snarking xenoblade-style again anytime soon. And that is not what I'm doing in this game. Not snarking the same way unfortunately isn't alignment indicative any more, and Nacho at least knows that.

In post 848, zMuffinMan wrote:i meant, which posts gave you this gut feeling? or is it not based on his posts?

It just general feeling, but that's since atrophied.

In post 850, borkjerfkin wrote:b

B is for BAH, which I'll be needing in this game eventually.

In post 857, morph the cat wrote:

In post 855, waynegg wrote:

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

If you compare it to her posts in Xenoblade you'll see the same kind of snark and put down toward people scum reading her. So much so she could have copy/pasted from that game and had essentially the same post.

Heh, I probably snark more and with less provocation as town, but the nature of the snark is different. Nacho pointed out the difference to me during a recent game. To the extent I can avoid it, I won't be snarking xenoblade-style again anytime soon. And that is not what I'm doing in this game. Not snarking the same way unfortunately isn't alignment indicative any more, and Nacho at least knows that.

I don't know that and there are at least two posts in Blade that are exactly matched with this one. Or are you saying tat you as scum would just say "Welp, ya got me. You all go on and lynch me now." because that would definitely be different from Xenkblade...

And by this one, I mean the post in question. Not the one I just quoted to reply to you.

In post 859, waynegg wrote:

In post 857, morph the cat wrote:

In post 855, waynegg wrote:

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

In post 844, pieguyn wrote:

@wayne:

can you elaborate on exactly what's wrong with that post

@zmuffin:

what are your thoughts on morph's 837

If you compare it to her posts in Xenoblade you'll see the same kind of snark and put down toward people scum reading her. So much so she could have copy/pasted from that game and had essentially the same post.

Heh, I probably snark more and with less provocation as town, but the nature of the snark is different. Nacho pointed out the difference to me during a recent game. To the extent I can avoid it, I won't be snarking xenoblade-style again anytime soon. And that is not what I'm doing in this game. Not snarking the same way unfortunately isn't alignment indicative any more, and Nacho at least knows that.

I don't know that and there are at least two posts in Blade that are exactly matched with this one. Or are you saying tat you as scum would just say "Welp, ya got me. You all go on and lynch me now." because that would definitely be different from Xenkblade...

I think if you go back and look you'll find that much of *my* snark in that game had considerably more edge to it. The post you pointed up hardly qualifies as snark at all. Might be useful to look at how I reacted to being misread in the Walking Dead game. Check specifically for my reactions to Mollie in both games, because when I'm town and she misreads me I usually don't take it very well. Same as scum, but the reactions are different.

This was well below my level of self awareness prior to Nacho pointing some stuff out to me during the Walking Dead game.

But I'm not Molly and you don't hold me to that standard. Or are you all of a sudden?

And if you're self aware of your meta enough to hold some of your natural snark, why should any of us put any weight on your self meta that that isn't enough snark to qualify for scumffery?

See the logical inconsistency there?

In post 324, BROseidon wrote:

In post 306, thezmon221 wrote:What do you mean? I'm not following you...

This was directed at morph. The fact that ffery/GiF found it forced is strange, because I found it cheeky (in a natural way), and ffery and I are usually on the same page.

In post 333, morph the cat wrote:Hey wayne, you're not doing something I associate with town you. Do you know what it is? And if you do, why aren't you doing it this game?

In post 350, thenewearth wrote:RBO

are you always like this?

You sound so much like the narrator on the stanley parable.

All you do is pretty much commentate on everything people do for 1 time, and then you don't pursue anything after commentating.

Do you think that what their doing is for scum?
or for town?
Why can't you ever, EVER, pursue and/or explain what's wrong with the stuff you quote?

Plus, the only vote you did was a varsoon vote. ON THE WHOLE GAME
TO TOP IT ALL OFF
IT WAS THE MOST POPULAR WAGON OF IT'S TIME

Scuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmzzzzzzzzzz

In post 856, waynegg wrote:

In post 851, Psychlone wrote:

In post 849, morph the cat wrote:GiF get in here and talk.

To be honest, I'm quite de-synced from this game after last weekend.

Really?

Yes.

So what are y'all talking about right now?
I wanna feel important and involved but in order to do so, I need to know what's going on and at this point, attempting to read the posts gives me headache.

Um, discard those first three quotes.

I never knew the site keeps the multiquote from hours ago <.<

Meh. Since they surfaced might as well as comment on those.

1. I don't have much exp with him, but nah, it still looks forced.
2. Not alignment-indicative, but I quoted it because it looked weird.
3. This post kinda looks like town TNE.

In post 862, waynegg wrote:But I'm not Molly and you don't hold me to that standard. Or are you all of a sudden?

No, you're not held to that standard at all. But I think you already know that.

In post 863, waynegg wrote:And if you're self aware of your meta enough to hold some of your natural snark, why should any of us put any weight on your self meta that that isn't enough snark to qualify for scumffery?

Wayne:
P1 ffery snarked when FoSed/Voted in Xenoblade and was scum
P2 ffery snarked when FoSed/Voted in Touhou
C1 ffery must be scum in Touhou because snark

ffery:
P1a ffery snarked when FoSed/Voted in Xenoblade and was scum
P2b ffery snarked when FoSed/Voted in Walking Dead and was town
Oh hey! P2c ffery snarked to the Nth degree in Death's Diner, put herself in time out for 24 hours and cooled the fuck down, and was town
P3 ffery has been made aware of her tendencies to snark and is now actively working to keep it alignment-unindicative
C1b the presence of snark is probably not alignment indicative

See the logical inconsistency there?

No, not quite. Maybe I should squint harder.

Yeah, you guys are scum. Sorry. And I see you're gonna make me wade through 5,243,867 2 posts so the rest of the thread can compare apples to apples. I know I'll never convince you guys that you're scum.

In post 864, Psychlone wrote:Yes.

I meant what's with making japes at a legit reason to think someone's lying?

You lost me there.

In post 868, waynegg wrote:Yeah, you guys are scum. Sorry. And I see you're gonna make me wade through 5,243,867 2 posts so the rest of the thread can compare apples to apples. I know I'll never convince you guys that you're scum.

I think you are concerned that what you'll find won't match your assertions.

I think you don't want me to pull up those matching posts

In post 849, morph the cat wrote:Null
thenewearth - play the damn game.

I thought you were gonna show at least a bit of interest