Page 35 of 89

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:48 am
by pitoli
P-edit: be patient >> I am typing and reading the thread from a phone and neither of these things are fun

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:53 am
by Nachomamma8
Sorry? What explanation were you expecting?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:54 am
by Nachomamma8
I also have no idea what "OMGUS can get you places" actually means.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:55 am
by pitoli
In post 845, Nachomamma8 wrote:
In post 842, pitoli wrote:That's okay. I really just want to know why you voted me because I didn't feel any conviction behind it.
oh there isn't conviction behind it
why did you vote me instead of ask me why?
In post 847, Nachomamma8 wrote:instead of ask me why i voted you :/
In post 851, Nachomamma8 wrote:Sorry? What explanation were you expecting?
Sigh. Why did you vote me?
If there was no conviction behind it, why bother

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:57 am
by pitoli
Ugh only the last quote is supposed to be there. Proof that I suck at phoneposting

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:04 am
by Nachomamma8
pitoli

i voted you with no conviction
you voted me because i had no conviction
i say i have no conviction
you say why vote with no conviction
i say because i want a momentum change

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:04 am
by Nachomamma8
i guess what i'm saying is that we're going literally nowhere

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:08 am
by pitoli
Now who's being underwhelming :/

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:10 am
by Nachomamma8
is this being underwhelming or just honest

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:14 am
by Deacon Blues
I don't understand what you're trying to do.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:16 am
by pitoli
I'm more confused than I was before??

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:16 am
by pitoli
Do you actually think I'm scum Nacho??

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:17 am
by Nachomamma8
no

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:17 am
by Nachomamma8
not yet

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:18 am
by pitoli
Then take your bloody momentum somewhere else

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:19 am
by Nachomamma8
why?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:23 am
by Nachomamma8
Vote: Minami

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:23 am
by pitoli
Because it will be more useful elsewhere

The only thing you're getting out of this right now is trolling me

P-edit: well this has been another productive 4am venture gnight

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:34 am
by mykonian
In post 816, Tammy wrote:Nice piece of taking something out of context and selective quoting there. He was responding to Minaho's reads list not to me.
bummer, misread 253.
In post 825, Kazekirimaru wrote:Fuck it

VOTE: Rufflig

Give me a body to analyze.
painful.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:40 am
by Tammy
Nacho - you feel like your team has already been narrowed by Poe know it's going to be, and you just decided to go fuck it. Let me just troll.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:00 am
by Mac
kaze wrote:Can you throw in a sold scumpitoli case with those cookes? I mean, she hasn't really been active, so I'm surprised you have her sorted out.
here's a brief summary:

- surface level comments & questions, which don't probe any further and which don't make her stand out from the crowd.

Spoiler: examples
In post 61, pitoli wrote:No, I didn't like that test either, Kaze.
In post 165, pitoli wrote:I'm not understanding the ProHawk votes
In post 231, pitoli wrote:
In post 166, Nachomamma8 wrote:Vote him; you'll find out soon enough.
Still waiting to be enlightened. Were you expecting the wagon?

I kinda like Tammy but it's more of a gut thing
In post 672, pitoli wrote:VOTE: Fuzzy logic
In post 727, pitoli wrote:UNVOTE:

-very little scumreads when asked for reads. infact, her first vote in the whole game was for fuzzy which just feels easy. it's a different vite because no one was on that wagon if I recall correctly, but it's not really doing much, is it?

- lack of engagement with my vote, as in no attempt to refute it and just ignoring it. perhaps hoping I go away. after nacho voted her, she finally acknowledged it but it felt like she was waving me away with her hand and still hoping I'd go away (by saying she liked my push but not going into detail)

- there isn't alot of attempts to find scum in her iso.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:03 am
by Tammy
Like you back off rufflig because you wanted a momentum change, which must mean you think I'm wrong about rufflig, yet you don't try to pull me down from him and tell me why I'm wrong? You know rufflig is wrong about me and you don't tell him why he's wrong?

You see Mykonian misattribute a post you made and you don't correct him?

Instead you pop in here and do meaningless dances that you know and admit are meaningless?

I don't think minaho is town, but the last time you talked about minaho, you were defending him. (That I remember getting ready to head to work can't confirm) and now you're voting him after admitting your pitoli push was crap?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:05 am
by mykonian
I'm sorry mac, I'm still in that period where I don't want to lynch pitoli.

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:03 am
by Minami no Hana
In post 866, Nachomamma8 wrote:
Vote: Minami
Why?

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 3:08 am
by orcinus_theoriginal
VOTE: nacho

who's online righ tnow