Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 6:05 am
Pressure, right. [Sarcastic tone] And the timing of that desire just happens to coincide with the TBG wagon and Ircher wagon dying.
Sure, larges are overwhelming, and I'll take your word on your meta. Still, when I start to receive townvibes I go guns-blazing crazy, not hide in a shell. seems a little like you're cashing out while ahead, is the point.In post 847, Persivul wrote:Because it's a large, and you're comparing to minis. I find larges overwhelming. I believe this is only my second. The previous was The Dating Game. Check it and you'll see I wasn't very active until the numbers had reduced.In post 842, Lowell wrote:fos pers I've come full circle on him. He now looks quiet and opportunistic, compared to what I was seeing early. In fact, he reads like scum who through good fortune earned some townpoints early and has been trying to coast on it ever since. I've seen pers do more than this, and given that this is a pretty dynamic game with lots of lolcharacters, I'm suspicious why I haven't seen it here.
I'm working on sorting Titus and ETL, which is likely much more important for the game than pushing some of the other people being pushed. For instance, I've had a scum read on Seth for some time, but that's something that can be pushed anytime. OTOH, in the dating game, I ended up in lylo with Titus, we were both town, but I scum read her. We won, but in spite of me. I'd prefer to sort such players earlier to the extent possible.In post 852, Lowell wrote:Sure, larges are overwhelming, and I'll take your word on your meta. Still, when I start to receive townvibes I go guns-blazing crazy, not hide in a shell. seems a little like you're cashing out while ahead, is the point.
And that means?In post 854, Lowell wrote:ETL > titus
Because I thought it was bad and didn't warrant a response, but if you insist:In post 857, Titus wrote:@Pers, why did you ignore 845?
Hopefully because your evidence has some objective basis which anyone could agree to. Are you now saying that you don't really have any evidence, just gut feelings or something, and you and kill are banding together based on nothing solid?@Pers, Why should I suppose ETL scumreads TBG for the same reasons I do, when we rarely agree on anything?
It's not groupthink if there's real evidence.You cheered us starting to disagree but you expect groupthink there?
Because you would give others the benefit of the doubt, making it null wrt ETL, or anyone for that matter.Second, ETL usually explains her votes and here she didn't. Why should I give ETL benefit of the doubt when scumreading her?
In post 859, Painbringer wrote:Nah, you are straining hard. You're going to get hemmoroids.
Yeah, anyone could agree to objective evidence. It hasn't happened with ETL (she fels the same way about me). In Street Racers London, she defended scum right off the noose. In the blitzgame, we shared reads but ETL lynched me because (guessing) she was too proud to admit I got their first. So no, what gives you any idea that ETL would magically follow my read on TPG? Doubly so given you're aware of this history?
Again, each and every time you attempt to make some dig at the evidence against TBG in here. You don't really state a townread on him either.
Groupthink can occur with evidence. That's a theory debate though.
What's null for one player isn't null for another. You know this. Everyone plays differently.
Since you think you have ETL's reasoning figured out, why do you think she voted there? Why aren't you voting TBG or townreading him but instead chainsawing on his behalf?
Actually you're projecting.In post 859, Painbringer wrote:Nah, you are straining hard. You're going to get hemmoroids.
So, anyone could agree to objective evidence...except ETL. You contradict yourself in the space of two sentences.Yeah, anyone could agree to objective evidence. It hasn't happened with ETL
No, I haven't done that at all. I'll take your word that there's evidence...but that means your argument that ETL had no basis for a TBG vote is incorrect. That doesn't bother me by itself. It's more that you won't let it go that's concerning.Again, each and every time you attempt to make some dig at the evidence against TBG in here.
I don't really care about him right now.You don't really state a townread on him either.
Uh, maybe because she had a scum read on him some time ago, and you've presented additional evidence against him, and there was a wagon building on him? Why is that unreasonable?Since you think you have ETL's reasoning figured out, why do you think she voted there?
On Day1, that was an okay answer. Not a super-town, not something that would be okay on eg. Day3, though.In post 835, Persivul wrote:Is it?
As for this... I saw something. And I wonder whether it will be significant.In post 835, Persivul wrote:this is the second instance today of Titus looking for a buddy.
I'll answer this later. Because of reasons.In post 836, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And you don’t draw any actual conclusion … you just leave it hanging there. Which is IIoA to a tee – lots of words that sum up to not a bit of game-releveant content.
His eintritt in 102 was both lazy and terrible. His laters are a bit better, but eg. 520 is again a lazy-push. His readlist 532 may or may not be genuine. Having checked it again, however, all the scumreads are "safe". (I mean, as far as I can remember, at that time any of those reads would have gained support from others.) He performed a Regardless of Card on Ircher in 603. Another lazy vote in 804. Actually, re-ISO-ing him again I've seen worse content than I remembered.In post 838, Titus wrote:Anen, can you explain your TBG read? I know you did awall but I am not following it with all the funy names and awkward speech.
What conclusions are wrong?In post 845, Titus wrote:@Anen, Please be on later. Your conclusions feel wrong (not scummy). I would like to get on the same page.
That reminds me of lazy-town-Aneninen...In post 851, Nosferatu wrote:tfw here but nothing to say
It's clear that Titus and ETL look like the "starts of the play" now. But I wouldn't stop pushing Seth.In post 853, Persivul wrote:I'm working on sorting Titus and ETL, which is likely much more important for the game than pushing some of the other people being pushed. For instance, I've had a scum read on Seth for some time, but that's something that can be pushed anytime.
What do you mean by this Anen?The conflict is that he looks like an easy wagon and people who don't really agree each other jumped on it. He looks like a "safe compromize".
I don't get why these players are agreeing being on this wagon right now.In post 806, SirCakez wrote:TehBrawlGuy (4) - Killthestory, Titus, EspeciallyTheLies, MagnaOfIllusion
Fedora Chick is me.In post 866, Aneninen wrote:I meant eg. you and ETL.
In fact,I don't get why these players are agreeing being on this wagon right now.In post 806, SirCakez wrote:TehBrawlGuy (4) - Killthestory, Titus, EspeciallyTheLies, MagnaOfIllusion
As for your reads.
Why is Magna and KTS town? Who the dancing little nymph is Fedora Chick? Why is Zakk and Heuristic lean town? Why is Copper still scummy? Aaaaand why is Persivul scum?
Agreed. I was once mislynched as SK for claiming scum with a faction I was not. It was a word flub.In post 868, Lowell wrote:@copper, he strikes me as newbtown. I think the SK "claim" was probably just a language flub, and if it wasn't, I doubt as scum he'd keep intentionally digging the hole deeper by bringing it up over and over again. It's all WIFOM, basically, but I'm good with it.