Mafiascum.net

Zach can you case on Shannon, really need you to be explaining your actions instead of blanket "x is town/mafia" statements

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

In post 850, Dunnstral wrote:Zach can you case on Shannon, really need you to be explaining your actions instead of blanket "x is town/mafia" statements

Another joke. Haha. I got it.

In post 840, Nosferatu wrote:

In post 833, Wake1 wrote:

In post 822, Dunnstral wrote:@Wake

no I knew you were talking about Titus

, thought I was being pretty clear in what I wrote

In post 805, Dunnstral wrote: I said I'd give detailed reasons tonight,

but i liked how you implied I wasn't skilled

and wouldn't catch on to whatever Titus would try pulling

You're not being consistent.

You say you knew I was talking about Titus, but earlier you said I implied you weren't skilled.

I never said you weren't skilled.

VOTE: Dunnstral

Mirhawk, you know you're to respond.

I don't see a lack of consistency here.

You do realize I said Titus was skilled enough to emulate her meta and Dunnstral said she didn't appreciate the implication of her being unskilled right?

Because I'm trying to make fucking sense out of it. Either she genuinely misunderstood OR she's Scum trying to pull something.

In post 851, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

Because I'm explaining my meaning to Wake? What are your thoughts on Wake's recent actions

In post 854, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 851, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

Because I'm explaining my meaning to Wake? What are your thoughts on Wake's recent actions

He's trying to find shit out. I kinda like it.

No he's not LOL he's caught up in a word jumble he himself created that confused himself

In post 851, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

Oh let's claim Masons in post 1. That's an intelligent idea. In this setup, he know if I was scum buddying him, because he already knows I'm not.

Not gonna pull a beeboy

I really don't care if they actually are masons there's like no reason at all that either Titus or Dunnstral should be in the lynch pool today at this point.

I'd rather do that than have him caught up in scumreading town

Titus wrote:

In post 851, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:I'm saying I would know if Titus was faking or buddying up to me, or at least wouldn't townread her right away but it's whatever

Why are you saying this as if it's a concern or ever was if Titus is your mason partner?

Oh let's claim Masons in post 1. That's an intelligent idea. In this setup, he

would

know if I was scum buddying him, because he already knows I'm not.

That's not what I said or attempted to suggest, if he wants to act like the fucking Dog Whisperer he can.

Hey, where's that unvote?

In post 848, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 845, Wake1 wrote:It could only be implied if the implication were that Dunnstral could emulate Titus' play.

But that would make zero sense.

So here we are, trying to get a straight answer.

You're trying to look fancy but it seems you had trouble with what I wrote in basic english? You're being dumb

Let's set the record clear. I never implied you weren't skilled. It wasn't about . It was about Titus.

There. The record's been set straight. First one's free.

Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

@Zach, Where's the vote on Shannon?

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

How's about naked voting conftown and providing jackshit in content to the thread?

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

Where's my Varsoon case?

Wake whether you like it or not you implied that I wouldn't be able to read Titus if she faked stuff because Titus is skilled

How does that translate to a vote?

I am very curious as to Varsoon's next few posts especially given the odd prescience of 713. Not that it means anything.

In post 865, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

Where's my Varsoon case?

I said tonight, when I'm on a computer

We have different definitions of tonight

Titus wrote:

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

How's about naked voting conftown and providing jackshit in content to the thread?

Who

In post 863, Titus wrote:@Zach, Where's the vote on Shannon?

I cast it. Like last page

In post 846, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 834, Titus wrote:

In post 829, Zachstralkita wrote:I want Wake to post more, PeregrineV was supposed to post more, I don't want to vote Mirhawk or Varsoon

Dunn if you had used your words, words aside from " Because I said so " your partner may not have claimed - if the claim is legit.

Titus, what say you diffuse your vote on me and I'll magically diffuse your wagon.

I'm a mason, you should be diffusing my wagon anyway, but I'll humor this if it gets me a bus.

Which of our mutual scumreads do you want to lynch?

Wait a minute... " if it gets me a bus"

YoU sTILL THINK I'M sCuM!

Yes.

VOTE: Shannon

In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 865, Zachstralkita wrote:

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

Where's my Varsoon case?

I said tonight, when I'm on a computer

We have different definitions of tonight

Titus wrote:

In post 862, Dunnstral wrote:Zach where's my Shannon case? I'm still voting V-boy over here

How's about naked voting conftown and providing jackshit in content to the thread?

Who

That would be Shannon

While your hurtful statements crack my stony exterior and pierce straight into my sprinkle-coated heart, I am not fazed because they are obviously false.

Ok Town Squadron dissassemble Titus wagon designate 0114-165 or don't if you feel it's the best scum gambit of 2016.


What's actually stopping one of you getting NK'd tonight, making the claim kinda pointless?

A doc hopefully, 50/50 targetting

Or jailkeeper if that's a thing, bodyguard, mafia having pity, etc