Mafiascum.net

Alright seems like noone else has any questions and I don't have much else to say, I trust people to finish the game out

VOTE: Teacher

It's okay. It's hardly damning evidence against you, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point it out.

EBWOP: It's okay. It's hardly damning evidence against you, but I'd be remiss if I didn't point it out. was meant @Rampage

Intent to hammer---- anyone object?

Fuck it... I'm ready for D3.

VOTE: Teacher

I Think nsg is the most likely partner.
I have a lean on the second player (already mentioned by me)
Any doc in the game should 100% be targeting me this night phase once teacher flips red

it's around midnight for Huntress I believe so we will have a long twilight

In post 855, Draynth wrote:I Think nsg is the most likely partner.
I have a lean on the second player (already mentioned by me)
Any doc in the game should 100% be targeting me this night phase once teacher flips red

Luckily we have a little margin for error nailing scum on D2.

it looks pretty good

we were lucky they didn't hit prs

Scioness, you thing nsg might be scum, right?

i don't think about nsg

the confident meta reading thing works only one way: nsg -> me

i want to believe but nsg should be lynch d3.

@Rampage... if you're around I'd like to ask you some questions in real time.

In post 811, Nachomamma8 wrote:2) The depth of her thought process from this game compared to other completed towngames is... jarring. I'm interested to hear Scioness's take here since Scioness has a bead on her meta, but this is typically one of the easier things to notice from game to game and often one of the more fruitful ones.

she was in all my games but i have never had to read her (i was scum twice and i've had her cop cleared d2 in another).
the thing i remember best is waiting for her to post

i'm shrugging off day 1 - i don't remember her saying anything that would seem out of character, one post pinged me but eh what didn't ping me this game. i disregard low activity when it comes to her.
d2 has been underwhelming. the problem is that the guilty was revealed really early and she's not got a chance to really post. eh.
fwitw, i agree with your conclusion. it felt like she didn't know what to post about and i think she should have.

tldr: as of right now I don't want her in lylo.

I'm not worried about low activity; not like I've done much this game at all. When I'm talking about depth of thought process, I'm talking about what she focuses on when she does talk about the game; I read her ISOs in a couple of games and she's a fantastic player, but she hasn't shown even a tiny tiny flash of that here which means that she's either forgotten how to play mafia, or she's scum. I can bring up what I'm talking about in more depth either tomorrow or postgame

oh yeah I understand what you are talking about

you have asked me about her so i just threw most of my thought there

In post 861, vulcan logician wrote:@Rampage... if you're around I'd like to ask you some questions in real time.

I am for a little while. Just got out of a movie

In post 864, Scioness Sajj wrote:oh yeah I understand what you are talking about

you have asked me about her so i just threw most of my thought there

Gotcha, sorry about that.

In post 863, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm not worried about low activity; not like I've done much this game at all. When I'm talking about depth of thought process, I'm talking about what she focuses on when she does talk about the game; I read her ISOs in a couple of games and she's a fantastic player, but she hasn't shown even a tiny tiny flash of that here which means that she's either forgotten how to play mafia, or she's scum. I can bring up what I'm talking about in more depth either tomorrow or postgame

Sorry I feel like I didn't answer this fully. Three am sugar rush and all that.

I don't know if you read that one newbie game that has over 100 pages and we were both town there. But that's what I think about when I think about D1!nsg. The lack of involvement, engaging me, going with mechanically correct play i saw it all before. So those things in themselves aren't something I would scumread her for. The lack of anything else in her ISO bothers me.

On the other hand.
I haven't read any of her scum games, but I imagine she can do better than this as scum? I don't know maybe I'm biased and looking for excuses but the lack of content may come form lack of involvement?

If you have time and feel like I'd love to read your in depth nsg analysis.

hmm

Well, I guess there's no doc in this setup.

yeah, pretty sure there isn't

i guess we should wait for a claim before we proceed?

I've played around 8 games so far, and I've never waited for a claim before initiating discussion. What would be the rationale for doing that?