Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:47 am
VOTE: non imhIn post 848, Non lmh wrote:noon question, is it possible for there to be both a jk and doc in this setup?
VOTE: non imhIn post 848, Non lmh wrote:noon question, is it possible for there to be both a jk and doc in this setup?
No, check out the chart in the opIn post 848, Non lmh wrote:noon question, is it possible for there to be both a jk and doc in this setup?
So you're saying she thinks we're in the doc/tracker setup?In post 849, Karnage wrote:how about 824 where non said they "SAVED" flavor leaf??In post 847, skitter30 wrote:No my problem is if she saw you visit fl why does she think she has a guilty, and not just that she saw you're a pr .... how does she know that fl was the person nk'd (from the pov you're giving)
rightIn post 852, skitter30 wrote:So you're saying she thinks we're in the doc/tracker setup?In post 849, Karnage wrote:how about 824 where non said they "SAVED" flavor leaf??In post 847, skitter30 wrote:No my problem is if she saw you visit fl why does she think she has a guilty, and not just that she saw you're a pr .... how does she know that fl was the person nk'd (from the pov you're giving)
In post 856, skitter30 wrote:You wanna point to your soft?
I guess the answer is NOIn post 857, Non lmh wrote:post contains the word soft
kIn post 545, Non lmh wrote:they have the most content to soft through, and rc doesn't really quote what he's referencing in his ISO, I've no real opinion on wither as of yet.In post 525, bugspray wrote:my main qualm with the readlist #494 is that it has a bunch of nullreads inside the spoiler and then just puts rc and skitter together outside as nulls as if it's an attempt to intensify the paranoia between them "sewing the seeds of chaos and destruction" pls noo most of my others concerns about the readlist seem to have been asked (should have written them down ugh i think i forgot a few during my accidental daynap)
would you mind asking away anyhow? pls)
I don't think a player that has to ask this:In post 862, skitter30 wrote:I actually think thats a p good soft
Is coming up with THAT as a soft claimNon lmh wrote:noon question, is it possible for there to be both a jk and doc in this setup?
In post 838, Karnage wrote:Slow your roll for a minute my feathery friendIn post 836, Lovebird wrote:Don't hammer or put to L1.
- I don't know what non and FL were trying to pull off but VOTE: Flavor LeafI'm the JK
Who can tell me what's missing from this claim/counterclaim sequence?In post 855, Non lmh wrote:for posterity's sake, don't misspell words
softclaimed on my very first day
there is no jk in this setup
What happens when I flip town?In post 873, Flavor Leaf wrote:I wanna do some analysis on the other way around, but I’m like 96% sure that the team is Skitter and the JK claim after thinking about it.
Lynch JK, track Skitter, doc tracker.
If Skitter’s not scum, then they get inno’d, and that’s good too.