Mafiascum.net

Drinks on me

My vote wasn't about not ISO ing, my question regarding replacements views on the person they took over was genuine, yes everyone has their own opinion, but end of the day the person they took over from they are playing the same role regardless of different ways of playing it. My vote was based on reaction. It stuck me as Scum, to me it was an over reaction. Whether anyone thinks it was stupid question or not the responce to me was not great and I'm not voting because of an insult am voting because I believe them to be Scum

don't worry, friend, attack isn't used in a negative way; i'm using it as a word to describe you questioning onnom's alignment (which is the norm in a game of mafia)

why do you think omnom has no reads? what doesn't satisfy you about the ones she's provided?

^that's to Looker

@Gjt: do you think omnon also overreacted in her exchange with Looker, or is justified there?

In post 852, Espeonage wrote:looker (2): nomnonom, looker

@mod: unless i've got some kind of disguise role i'm not aware of, that looker self-vote should be me

In post 847, Nicholai wrote:@omnom: do you think invis is actually scum? have you played with him before?

Yeah I think so. Never played with him but the lolrandom facade is easy to do as scum to avoid suspicion and if there's one day where we can try and see what we can do about that it's today right.

This is the second time I'm getting X'd this game you have no idea how much my heart is broken.

What do you think about Looker Ank?

In post 855, Nicholai wrote:@Gjt: do you think omnon also overreacted in her exchange with Looker, or is justified there?

I feel Omnon is very defensive and seems to react easily. I have seen this a lot in the past from a frustrated Townie especially when turned out the had a power role and if Town it does get frustrating throughout the game when all you do is tell the truth but are accused of lying from both Town and Scum.

However I am sticking with my gut on this one and believe her to be Scum

I have all the reasons to believe someone is town because how they're reacting to the game is townie and I've seen it a lot before but because I am stubborn and can't be assed to give other reads so I'll still vote them die scum

???

tbh I think he's a real looker

no but really no read on him yet

I have the impression Gjt is justifying something that could be summed up in a few words but instead tries to overjustify himself which is usually a scum trademark, but like... ergh

Post Dodge
sorry long day..... will come back tomorrow and post something worth wild

V/LA 2days please
should have plenty of time during the weekend, will play along then

In post 863, nomnomnom wrote:I have the impression Gjt is justifying something that could be summed up in a few words but instead tries to overjustify himself which is usually a scum trademark, but like... ergh

I disagree. It is always better to overjustify than underjustify, no matter which alignment you play. By “over justifying” you ensure that your logic is fully understood by everyone, which allows you to convince people to vote with you. It is beneficial for scum because it causes mislynch, and beneficial for town because the person you think is scum gets lynched.
Therefore, overjustification cannot indicate alignment.

why'd you choose to comment on that of everything, Rex? can i hear your opinion on Gjt's scumread on Nomo? do you think it's genuine and/or correct?

loving the new avatar btw; you look dazzling

I’m not scum

stop calling me lol random

more insightful posts later

nom looks town in the Looker and Nom thing interaction battle fight gauntlet trial challenge engagement

In post 818, Ankamius wrote:Well that was certainly an engagement

Ok ank

fassad lol

In post 849, Looker wrote:theFuzzyLogic and FlavorLeaf are town

wacky