Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:51 pm
But he never asked me to join it, or maybe I'm not understanding.
Page 35 of 48
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:53 pm
my pronouns are they/them please
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:54 pm
M/b the lawyer guy avi threw me off
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:54 pm
ok u actually kinda quantified my gut read into something tangible. I sorta tend to forget over time why i gut read someone as scummy but this was a reminder to that.In post 848, Detective Pikachu wrote:He thinks that not wanting to work together with a town block but not attacking the inclusion of members directly is scummy. Effectively he was asking for your initial take on his reads and you came off as defensive, if I understand his reasoning. Now in this case you didn't understand the concept, but since you didn't react the way he expected town to act, isn't he justified from his point of view in suspecting you?In post 652, DkKoba wrote:I am drunk but I want natsu pushed bc they didnt join my townblocc earier
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:56 pm
honestly i feel lost as fuck and dont have much hard confidence in any read right now. theres stuff thats like scummy and shit and like yeah i can see some people as being scum but nothing hardline.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 2:56 pm
this is not an easy d1 game,I regret not being aggressive this game
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:00 pm
like I want to be sure of my push before I commit. for the record if u put a gun to my head and forced me to choose id lynch natsu right now for their reaction to the push on them
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:01 pm
Why not Pikachu? He's had just as big of a push and has had far more interactions to dissect?
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:50 pm
Everyone waiting for Dsjstr's replacement
Spoiler:
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:08 pm
Reading up to page 31, and I'm getting Town vibes from Spy and Pikachu. I'm trying my hardest to stay open-minded on the latter even though his antagonistic style rubs me up the wrong way.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:16 pm
I don't like 72's Spy vote at the bottom of that page - it's at odds with the impression I got from Spy's recent posts, and the reasoning is pretty forced. Pikachu and Natsu have been the two most dubious slots in the game imo, so pushing both of them doesn't seem strange from my pov.
I also like how Spy is developing their reads based on further interactions, which 72 isn't taking into account.
I also like how Spy is developing their reads based on further interactions, which 72 isn't taking into account.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:24 pm
782 sums up some of the problems I had with Natsu's reads. I felt like their transition from wanting me dead to TR'ing me was pocketing, based on the fact I was voting/arguing with the player who was pushing his wagon.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:30 pm
This seems like a disingenuous interpretation, though, and easy points scoring.In post 797, 72offsuit wrote:This post is giving me a bad vibe.In post 788, Natsu wrote:782I am pretty sure I didn't TR Luca until much more recently, are you saying I am now TRing him after he jumped on your wagon?He emphasizes a townread on Luca, who hasn't actually joined the wagon on him and who was at the time still voting his counter-wagon
@Spy I still don't see how you would assume you would be killed when there are far more obv-town people who have never been voted for a considerable length.
It sounds like you are saying you cant Remember what sort of read You had on luca. I would expect you to have at least some feel for where playersie on the town to scum scale. Only scum has to 'remember'.
It's a famous Mark Twain quote:
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything
Its like you arent looking for tells, but are rather just artificially coming up with reads.
I always say things like 'I think' and' 'I'm pretty sure' when I actually know something for certain.
I feel like you're the one eyeing up the suspected slots right now.
VOTE: 72
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:33 pm
Did you seriously just vote a TR to try and demonstrate you're not partners?In post 804, Hectic wrote:Let's do it and take this for a spin.In post 802, Detective Pikachu wrote:That's right hectic, it's time to bus natsu :3
VOTE: Natsu
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:40 pm
VOTE: Hectic
I like this more, actually.
The fact his presence has diminished more and more since an eventful RVS phase, and the fact he's sat on his reads all day (Spy being scum, Natsu being Town) but now suddenly votes his TR at the drop of a hat for town credit.
I like this more, actually.
The fact his presence has diminished more and more since an eventful RVS phase, and the fact he's sat on his reads all day (Spy being scum, Natsu being Town) but now suddenly votes his TR at the drop of a hat for town credit.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:08 pm
Hardly. I posted my scumreads of AC/Natsu/R1 and urself back on pg12, p275. 0 votes on natsu at that stage.In post 862, Luca Blight wrote:This seems like a disingenuous interpretation, though, and easy points scoring.In post 797, 72offsuit wrote:This post is giving me a bad vibe.In post 788, Natsu wrote:782I am pretty sure I didn't TR Luca until much more recently, are you saying I am now TRing him after he jumped on your wagon?He emphasizes a townread on Luca, who hasn't actually joined the wagon on him and who was at the time still voting his counter-wagon
@Spy I still don't see how you would assume you would be killed when there are far more obv-town people who have never been voted for a considerable length.
It sounds like you are saying you cant Remember what sort of read You had on luca. I would expect you to have at least some feel for where playersie on the town to scum scale. Only scum has to 'remember'.
It's a famous Mark Twain quote:
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything
Its like you arent looking for tells, but are rather just artificially coming up with reads.
I always say things like 'I think' and' 'I'm pretty sure' when I actually know something for certain.
I feel like you're the one eyeing up the suspected slots right now.
VOTE: 72
So you stating im eyeing suspected slots is total BS.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:11 pm
Why do you not like my vote on IMASPY? I was already voting for him. He just wanted me to change it under his name, which i thought was fair enough, as he has clearly put time into this game. You stating you dont like my vote makes ZERO sense though. I was already voting for him.In post 860, Luca Blight wrote:I don't like 72's Spy vote at the bottom of that page - it's at odds with the impression I got from Spy's recent posts, and the reasoning is pretty forced. Pikachu and Natsu have been the two most dubious slots in the game imo, so pushing both of them doesn't seem strange from my pov.
I also like how Spy is developing their reads based on further interactions, which 72 isn't taking into account.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:12 pm
That doesn't really negate what I said, though.In post 865, 72offsuit wrote:
Hardly. I posted my scumreads of AC/Natsu/R1 and urself back on pg12, p275. 0 votes on natsu at that stage.
So you stating im eyeing suspected slots is total BS.
The fact your Spy read hasn't changed is odd to me, and your 797 was a poor reason to shade Natsu, which makes it look like you're jumping on anything.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:15 pm
Fair enough, I missed that post from Spy that prompted the vote.In post 866, 72offsuit wrote:Why do you not like my vote on IMASPY? I was already voting for him. He just wanted me to change it under his name, which i thought was fair enough, as he has clearly put time into this game. You stating you dont like my vote makes ZERO sense though. I was already voting for him.In post 860, Luca Blight wrote:I don't like 72's Spy vote at the bottom of that page - it's at odds with the impression I got from Spy's recent posts, and the reasoning is pretty forced. Pikachu and Natsu have been the two most dubious slots in the game imo, so pushing both of them doesn't seem strange from my pov.
I also like how Spy is developing their reads based on further interactions, which 72 isn't taking into account.
I still can't relate to your read, though.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:15 pm
I don't like the fact that between the last meaningful post of p660 and the current posts, the most you redig from rereading, is viewing my revoting of the slot im already actually voting as being scummy.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:17 pm
I've said a few times now it's the lack of development of your read I find scummy, not the vote itself.In post 869, 72offsuit wrote:I don't like the fact that between the last meaningful post of p660 and the current posts, the most you redig from rereading, is viewing my revoting of the slot im already actually voting as being scummy.
I didn't realise you were already voting Spy, but that's actually irrelevant to my point.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:19 pm
I'm not shading, I've already stated several times that I'm happy with a Natsu lynch. How is that shading?
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:20 pm
If you can't relate to my read, I can understand that.
But your comments Re: shading and eyeing off easy lynches is not legit
But your comments Re: shading and eyeing off easy lynches is not legit
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:22 pm
You can be happy with someone's lynch and still shade them; the two things aren't incongruent.In post 871, 72offsuit wrote:I'm not shading, I've already stated several times that I'm happy with a Natsu lynch. How is that shading?
You're painting something as scummy which simply isn't. Maybe it's unintentional and you've never seen such expressions, but it came off as disingenuous.
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:25 pm
I don't think you're comment aimed at Spy was legit either.In post 872, 72offsuit wrote:If you can't relate to my read, I can understand that.
But your comments Re: shading and eyeing off easy lynches is not legit
Sometimes to make a point I show that someone is doing the same as what they accuse others of doing, like I did to Pikachu earlier regarding the misreps.