Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:46 am
I wonder if this is an "extreme circumstance" (tm) to extend the deadline.
Numbers dnt lie, unlike ur love and feelings for us </3In post 846, DrDolittle wrote:NO MORE NUMBERS THIS GAME IS A GAME BASED ON LOVE AND FEELINGS
I think this is a hard to fake and consistent reasons for a voteIn post 800, Clover Ebi wrote:Oh I forgot I said that! Uh, I first was curious and wanted to wagon DrD because I remember someone defending him because of his slot on the listing and wanted to see if someone would use that to defend a partner, but I didn't really have much more to go off of so that's probably why I forgot.
This on the other hand feels artifitial, cause it is based on optimal play; I feel town is more inclined to take this kind of positions that scum EXACTLY bc scum is more concious against taking such positionsIn post 806, Umlaut wrote:If you think Marquis is scum there's no reason to be against the wagon.In post 797, Clover Ebi wrote:Yes that is because it's exactly what I'm doing. What's wrong with that?In post 796, Umlaut wrote:This reads phony to me.In post 785, Clover Ebi wrote:I still dislike this but it might just be my style of play then anything. I don't plan on hammering though!
It seems like you're taking a position against the Marquis wagon but not one that would actually dissuade anyone from hammering it.
If you think they're town you should try and push a better elim candidate.
If you have no idea you should try to get an idea.
Just "registering your objection" is what scum does with wagons on town that they expect to go through with or without their support.
In post 849, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: grumpy cat
MS is trying to foster an environment of inclusiveness where everyone can be happy. No grumpiness allowed.
by that logic shouldn't we be inclusive towards grumpiness?In post 849, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: grumpy cat
MS is trying to foster an environment of inclusiveness where everyone can be happy. No grumpiness allowed.
In post 833, DrDolittle wrote:We should lynch marquis
In post 836, DrDolittle wrote:Alternatively I can do gypyx actually
i am interested in further elaboration on what has caused you to whittle your scumlist down from six names to two in a relatively short space of time.In post 837, DrDolittle wrote:Yeah I don't really want anyone else. Not even you dear Umlaut you worm you
feel like we all could have made this exact post three days ago
its hard to exlain, but my gut says flip thisIn post 841, Gypyx wrote:Idk, the numbers are already saying dat is susp, so for scum!datisi pushing marquis isn't really making the statistics worse imoIn post 840, DrDolittle wrote:If dats is scum and marquis is town, pushing the marquis elimination would make the number god frown on dats, so in that sense maybe
if marquis ends up making some good ass claim or some shit this is probably where i'm going next nglIn post 872, Iconeum wrote:its hard to exlain, but my gut says flip thisIn post 841, Gypyx wrote:Idk, the numbers are already saying dat is susp, so for scum!datisi pushing marquis isn't really making the statistics worse imoIn post 840, DrDolittle wrote:If dats is scum and marquis is town, pushing the marquis elimination would make the number god frown on dats, so in that sense maybe