Page 35 of 82

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:46 am
by DrDolittle
I wonder if this is an "extreme circumstance" (tm) to extend the deadline.

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:57 am
by word321
I am
BAAAAAAAAACK

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:57 am
by word321
In post 846, DrDolittle wrote:NO MORE NUMBERS THIS GAME IS A GAME BASED ON LOVE AND FEELINGS
Numbers dnt lie, unlike ur love and feelings for us </3

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:00 am
by word321
In post 800, Clover Ebi wrote:Oh I forgot I said that! Uh, I first was curious and wanted to wagon DrD because I remember someone defending him because of his slot on the listing and wanted to see if someone would use that to defend a partner, but I didn't really have much more to go off of so that's probably why I forgot.
I think this is a hard to fake and consistent reasons for a vote

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:02 am
by word321
In post 806, Umlaut wrote:
In post 797, Clover Ebi wrote:
In post 796, Umlaut wrote:
In post 785, Clover Ebi wrote:I still dislike this but it might just be my style of play then anything. I don't plan on hammering though!
This reads phony to me.

It seems like you're taking a position against the Marquis wagon but not one that would actually dissuade anyone from hammering it.
Yes that is because it's exactly what I'm doing. What's wrong with that?
If you think Marquis is scum there's no reason to be against the wagon.

If you think they're town you should try and push a better elim candidate.

If you have no idea you should try to get an idea.

Just "registering your objection" is what scum does with wagons on town that they expect to go through with or without their support.
This on the other hand feels artifitial, cause it is based on optimal play; I feel town is more inclined to take this kind of positions that scum EXACTLY bc scum is more concious against taking such positions

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:03 am
by word321
In particular, I think umlaut is could be pushing something he thinks is good to push by textbook standards

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:04 am
by word321
So im still nice n cozy on umlauts wagon

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:18 am
by Grumpy Cat
In post 849, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: grumpy cat
MS is trying to foster an environment of inclusiveness where everyone can be happy. No grumpiness allowed.
Image

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 10:59 am
by the worst
In post 849, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: grumpy cat
MS is trying to foster an environment of inclusiveness where everyone can be happy. No grumpiness allowed.
by that logic shouldn't we be inclusive towards grumpiness?

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 11:10 am
by Grumpy Cat
Image

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:19 pm
by the worst
shit so true.

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:33 pm
by iamausername
In post 833, DrDolittle wrote:We should lynch marquis
In post 836, DrDolittle wrote:Alternatively I can do gypyx actually
In post 837, DrDolittle wrote:Yeah I don't really want anyone else. Not even you dear Umlaut you worm you
i am interested in further elaboration on what has caused you to whittle your scumlist down from six names to two in a relatively short space of time.

Umlaut especially, because i'm kind of having the opposite reaction to his more recent posts - i feel like i'm starting to see where people are coming from on that wagon.

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:35 pm
by DrDolittle
I want to eliminate no low posters rn for the health of the game. The worst town is one that doesn't have conviction, which is what's happening right now with the MIA of marquis.

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:39 pm
by Something_Smart
hello

I have nothing that I want to say before Marquis claims

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:45 pm
by iamausername
In post 863, Something_Smart wrote:hello

I have nothing that I want to say before Marquis claims
feel like we all could have made this exact post three days ago

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 2:22 pm
by the worst
VOTE: marquis

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:08 pm
by DrDolittle
replacement for marquis time?

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:24 pm
by Hoopla
hmm this is rough...

but lets look at the glass half full;

perhaps we're doing
so well
in this game that the scumteam is collectively panicking. this display of extreme stalling being a desperate ploy to get things back on their terms.

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 5:37 pm
by the worst
maybe :0

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:08 pm
by Iconeum
rawr!

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:08 pm
by Datisi
hi ico i missed you

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:10 pm
by Iconeum
i've somewhat kept up with this game during my vla but like

what i actually remember is smt like

umlaut v marquis wagon

'omg marquis not posting must be scum'
'the numbers, mason, the numbers'
'no u'

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:12 pm
by Iconeum
In post 841, Gypyx wrote:
In post 840, DrDolittle wrote:If dats is scum and marquis is town, pushing the marquis elimination would make the number god frown on dats, so in that sense maybe
Idk, the numbers are already saying dat is susp, so for scum!datisi pushing marquis isn't really making the statistics worse imo
its hard to exlain, but my gut says flip this

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:14 pm
by Iconeum
@drdolittle, what was up with the vote on grumpy?

it's an odd thing to do given the gamestate?

Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:15 pm
by Datisi
In post 872, Iconeum wrote:
In post 841, Gypyx wrote:
In post 840, DrDolittle wrote:If dats is scum and marquis is town, pushing the marquis elimination would make the number god frown on dats, so in that sense maybe
Idk, the numbers are already saying dat is susp, so for scum!datisi pushing marquis isn't really making the statistics worse imo
its hard to exlain, but my gut says flip this
if marquis ends up making some good ass claim or some shit this is probably where i'm going next ngl