Mafiascum.net

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:We can talk about why Mathblade is scum if you want.

I'd love to.

I think he's obviously town.

So assume you're wrong about me and convince me why I'm wrong about MathBlade. Or point me to a post where you've done this.

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.

You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlist

hey, Hey Spiffeh.
If you're going to tell me not to post any posts attacking Mathblade you can't turn around and spend it defending him.

Sure I can Bell.

My content hasn't been monopolized by MathBlade. Yours, before my request, had.

I make the rules here.

I am uninspired now Spiffeh.
You're uninspiring me.

Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason

And then they latched onto that and scumread me for it and kept that read; the slightest provocation set them off on that path. They are the one who looks 'desperate' as they said
Posts 492, 499, 504, 550, 554

As a sort of exercise, can you figure out Mathblade's reason for voting me?

In post 838, Dunnstral wrote:Sircakez, Battle Mage, GreyIce, and yourself

This is resistance to mathblade, not all are ok with going titus as well; most are instead tunneled on me to a frankly unrealistic degree

Sangres is honorarily ont he list because they keep directing questions at me

while supposedly suspecting Mathblade

but it doesn't have the same feel

What?

We've been settled on a Mathblade townread since before the afternoon phase started, and I don't think Nacho ever had a scumread on Math.

We voted you last night.

Nacho told LLD that we'd to Titus if she'll vote there.

And then I moved our vote from you to Titus when Greyice voted there. That was a very comfortable move to make, not only because Nacho had already indicated he'd vote there, but also because my scumread of you has weakened over your content over the last 24 hours. I pushed you on your comments about people giving us too easy townreads because it was one of my points of concern, and I didn't absolutely hate your responses to that.

I have some vague feels that Math's page 30 posts sounded a little too "look how I'm not caring if I get miselimed", but the preponderance of his posts, particularly interactions with Titus and Bell, feel town to Nacho, and I'm very comfortable going along with that.


----------------------

@Math, I'm EXTREMELY uncomfortable with your post count burn rate in a page-restricted game.

In post 483, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 329, MathBlade wrote:

In post 321, SirCakez wrote:

In post 268, Kitty Trauma Team wrote:

In post 265, SirCakez wrote:Ok what's your point here? This is such a dumb thing to nitpick.

My point is that I feel like you're making mountains out of emotional molehills by calling that a meltdown, and that's a real real strong alarm bell to me.

So again, I ask you, what part of that post you quoted do you call a meltdown? Two mildly peeved posts, if even that level of annoyance is hardly a meltdown, but that's the word you used.

-k

He was literally saying he was excited to play the game but was accepting that he was going to be elimmed after like one person attacked him. It was ridiculous.

LLD Mala Prism Bell Titus Dunn are one person. Some have stated they’ve checked out til elim phase. That’s not one person.

Are you saying I somehow attacked you?

Let's not forget about this.

In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?

I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.

I'm not townreading Math.

In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt

In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.

This is what I was looking at when I made the post.

In post 851, Spiffeh wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.

You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlist :lol:

Then I'll get math elimmed

In post 854, Bell wrote:I am uninspired now Spiffeh.
You're uninspiring me.

My intention was to inspire you to scumhunt elsewhere, not uninspire you.

If it makes you feel better, read closely and you'll see that my recent mentions of MathBlade were used as a tool to engage with Dunnstral, not really meant to defend MathBlade himself.

Anyway, I feel like I've posted enough today and want to respect the deadline/page count so I'm forcing myself to stay away til tomorrow. I'm extremely curious as to what Tammy thinks of Dunnstral and GreyICE and her general thoughts on the game. I think she said she'd be back tonight so hopefully I'll have some phenomenal Tammy content upon my return.

Dunnstral wrote:

In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?

I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.

I'm not townreading Math.

In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt

In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.

This is what I was looking at when I made the post.

That's a pretty damn curated segment of our trajectories on Math. I'd go so far as to say "cherry-picked".

In post 861, sangres wrote:

Dunnstral wrote:

In post 151, sangres wrote:Have you played with Math since coming back from hiatus?

I haven't. Nacho probably has more recent game experience than me.

I'm not townreading Math.

In post 279, sangres wrote:I'm going to take this under advisement because Mathblade's approach to the game, particularly that bit about 1 but not 2 scum in prism/bork gave me a nasty case of hives. Maybe you can be the counter-balance to my tendencies wrt

In post 697, sangres wrote:I kinda feel the same but I'm not sure how much of it comes from the Dunn wagon basically popping up as a counter to the Mathblade push.

This is what I was looking at when I made the post.

That's a pretty damn curated segment of our trajectories on Math. I'd go so far as to say "cherry-picked".

Yeah.

What you're not realizing is that I'm not trying to prove that you had this opinion, I'm trying to prove that when I was typing up my reply and looking over your posts, this was the impression I got. I also skimmed over something like "It's strange that we're not seeing math in the same way" which was neutral without looking into context

I think I was out to lunch on Spiffeh in 801

860 is really town

In post 855, Dunnstral wrote:Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason

you first mentioned traitor (499) after math declared a scumread on you (492)

this just seems like a "math is OMGUSing me" dressed up in something irrelevant, factually untrue or otherwise

In post 864, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 855, Dunnstral wrote:Look how easily they scumread me when I pointed out that they would be the most likely traitor for bringing up traitor for what seems like no reason

you first mentioned traitor (499) after math declared a scumread on you (492)

this just seems like a "math is OMGUSing me" dressed up in something irrelevant, factually untrue or otherwise

It's not omgus because I didn't call them scum. They said I attacked them somewhere but they can't point to it, and indeed I didn't even mention them prior.

Seperate point, look at 550 and try to work out what Math is saying here

In post 152, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.

Scummy reads

Probably would've been my guess

In post 550, MathBlade wrote:Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown

I literally can't parse this

In post 866, borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 152, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 110, MathBlade wrote:I think Spiffeh town BM scum Prism null LLD scum lean Cakez is prob town but scum in a very minor circumstance so not considering it. If I am right then Titus is town by proxy.

Scummy reads

Probably would've been my guess

I forgot I made this post. Looking back these were scummy reads

borkjerfkin wrote:

In post 550, MathBlade wrote:Eg Dunn and Cakez although not voting saying meltdown

I literally can't parse this

It's their justification for voting me

Now think bork. Think of all the questions that have been coming my way from sangres and spiffeh

Why does it feel like people aren't questioning Mathblade?

yes, i get that the implication is that they're chainsawing you to protect him. that's heavily dependent on unflipped associations. do you think sangres is scum? You kinda have to for the convenience of this argument, but it also seems like you only do due to perceived (<-- you kinda acknowledged this) waffly takes of sangres about mathblade and that is inherently circular reasoning

on the other hand there's been like a metric fuckton of conversation about mathblade, and you've come out on the side of "this is a concerted effort to protect a buddy" vs "some other people are seeing something different than me" and it's odd that you're just not considering the latter

In post 851, Spiffeh wrote:

In post 849, Dunnstral wrote:The only way I'm getting eliminated today is if LLD thinks that is a good idea.

You are severely overestimating the pull LLD has in this playerlist

You're underestimating it. Don't mistake leaning back on the gas pedal to allow natural growth for a lack of ability to ram something down your throat.

Hell, I could bronze you today if I wanted, Spiffeh. It'd make the game severely unfun for you in the process, and I'm not nearly confident enough to do that yet, but I could.

Dunn's point comes from the right place. I'm a confirmed townie, playing a head of the class role, with a lot of control over the game. And I've been on fire reading Dunn as of late. Unless I say so, Dunn isn't dying.

Oh, and Titus acting like I'm going to be upset that she says I'm all about control is fucking hilarious.

I've literally given lectures to townies about how control is important and when to talk and when to shut up and let someone lead. I've let others lead in the past via this method. You think I'm ashamed to admit I am assuming direct control? It's exactly what I'm doing.

Titus earns bonus scum equity for calling any reaction I might have to that pre-emptively a "tantrum", because it reads like her trying to pre-empt being yelled at for having a bad take and regain some thread control.

And we know she knows she needs to do that if she's scum because she just had a whole talk about thread control.

So if anything is manipulative, it's that.

In post 833, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 827, SirCakez wrote:what are you trying to insinuate here?

don't be nervous buddy

I'm not nervous your logic is terrible if it's what I think you're implying.
Why would I be coaching Math in thread if we were buddies?

In post 868, Dunnstral wrote:It's their justification for voting me

what does it mean then?

Dunnstral is all like "better not let this easy miselim slip out of our hands"