Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:33 am
How is it opportunistic?In post 846, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Subtle can you explain your vote. It seems opportunistic. Why are you voting BM here?
How is it opportunistic?In post 846, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Subtle can you explain your vote. It seems opportunistic. Why are you voting BM here?
like itIn post 839, Mad Hatters Tea Party wrote:I find myself in agreement with Raya; Proelium Magus is a suitable compromise.
Where Rathe is rather lacking overall, they are consistently so. Battle Mage appears to make several promises that he has failed to keep, many promises of content and potentially alignment revealing thoughts. I find myself unable to reconstruct much of the Mages thoughts nor reads.
VOTE: Battle Mage
don't like it - why?
like itIn post 842, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:the wagons are blah for me generally.....The Rathe wagon atp seem bad. Its possible they are newbcum but I think we need more time to sort. Honestly i have no idea on how to sort Mastina atp. Her play is just wierd but I am not sure if it just normal Mastina weird or scum Mastina weird. Like Rathe, I want to take at least another day to sort her .Also, Mastina seems like an easy mislynch for today
I agree with Reya here BM seems like a good compromise vote here. Not sure if they are scum but seems they will more likely flip scum then Mastina or Rathe
don't like it
don't like itIn post 832, Raya36 wrote:I'd be ok with battle mage. I don't see anything towny from them and I'm townreading a lot of people this game
VOTE: Battle Mage
who is they?In post 855, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:1) they jumped on a quick wagon
2) they have not explained why as far as I know
3) the voted Rathe which seems like an easy mislynch
That all applies to me as well. Why didn't you say my vote was opportunistic?In post 855, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:1) they jumped on a quick wagon
2) they have not explained why as far as I know
3) the voted Rathe which seems like an easy mislynch
and on a similar point, why were people giving Rathe shit for not saying much, when I said fk all?In post 860, PenguinPower wrote:That all applies to me as well. Why didn't you say my vote was opportunistic?In post 855, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:1) they jumped on a quick wagon
2) they have not explained why as far as I know
3) the voted Rathe which seems like an easy mislynch
In post 854, Battle Mage wrote:don't like it - why?
Yeah, I remember RC told me that on D1, the least charismatic player is more often than not likely to be elimed and they are far more likely to be lhf than not.In post 838, Raya36 wrote:Rathe seems like lhf for scum right now. The way they're posting seems NAIIn post 835, PenguinPower wrote:what do you like about rathe?
Because he was actively refusing to.In post 861, Battle Mage wrote:and on a similar point, why were people giving Rathe shit for not saying much, when I said fk all?
no
you think that's scummy!?In post 864, PenguinPower wrote:Because he was actively refusing to.In post 861, Battle Mage wrote:and on a similar point, why were people giving Rathe shit for not saying much, when I said fk all?
re-read the lead up and ask me again if you still don't get itIn post 865, Battle Mage wrote:no
^very aggressive and pushy, but narrowly focussed on Rathe - where the wagon was - and ignored me entirely until I voted Superb.In post 715, Superb Subtlety wrote:VOTE: Rathe
That last post is purely self-serving and hasn't led into anything
I feel like if he actually thought scum were pushing him because of inactivity then he would be happy to name names and actually put out some content here
i try to avoid pronouns entirely nowadays and just name the player.In post 869, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:SAM- Subtle/ I use they as not to mess up pronouns as I often do.
Battke- what do you think of Mastina . Do you have a lean for her
Penguin- True however you jumped on the wagon early when it had less steam so it seems to be less optimistic. Also your play have been a lot better then Subtle. Looking back as a whole I have become less and less impressed with Subtle overall play . They seem like they are kinda sakting by . Not as bad as Wheme imho but still skating
nah you're just trolling, you do youIn post 868, PenguinPower wrote:re-read the lead up and ask me again if you still don't get itIn post 865, Battle Mage wrote:no
you have to put in some effort