Mafiascum.net

In post 816, Dwlee99 wrote:

@Mod: Can you put VFP in the first post as having replaced hugs?

Nero can you explain your last posts' reads like I don't believe in pre-flip associatives (ESRLIDBIPFA)?

right my bad

votecount 1.6

Petapan (3) :

Titus - Dragon of the West - osuka

nomnomnom (2) :

Rathe - VFP

Dwlee99 (2) :

Derek12 - Save The Dragons

Anya (2) :

DrippingGoofball - Petapan

Save The Dragons (2) :

nomnomnom - Dwlee99

Dragon of the West (2) :

ssbm_Kyouko -Anya

Osuka (1) :

Andresvmb

Titus (1) :

Nero Cain

Not voting (2) :

- Dunnstral - T3

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-06-12 01:56:28)

, with 17 alive, it takes 9 to turn someone into a corpse

announcements

Titus is V/LA

flavor

video number 797
summary - Comical Geography documentary about the contry of Hyrule
would recommend ? - we're gonna have some language issues there

Derek12-saves a replace
Andresvmb-lurking and useless
Dunnstral-lurking and useless
nomnomnom-WTF posting and scummy
Titus-lurking and scummy
petapan-bad and scummy
Dragon of the West-a lil' scummy


I'd be ok lynching any of these slots

VOTE: petapan

In post 795, Nero Cain wrote:

@nom

do you have any example of you refusing to post reads lists or talking about how you don't like to make them?

Really looking for me to find a needle in a haystack huh?
You can do your bit of work and see that, as I said, games where I posted readlists have been where I was scum, because as town I have a more stream of consciousness style (or had, I'm feeling a bit less chaotic mentally, therapy helps)

In post 813, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 804, Rathe wrote:nero y r u saying so much about nomnom but u r not voting him

b/c im posting and playing and not worried about the days lynch yet.

In post 806, Rathe wrote:u go out of ur way to keep commenting about nomnom

im really not

In post 807, Rathe wrote:then u keep saying people are probably town but also could be scum

sorry that I don't know ppl alignments.

What do you actully think about the things I'm saying about nom?

In post 852, Nero Cain wrote:Derek12-saves a replace
Andresvmb-lurking and useless
Dunnstral-lurking and useless
nomnomnom-WTF posting and scummy
Titus-lurking and scummy
petapan-bad and scummy
Dragon of the West-a lil' scummy


I'd be ok lynching any of these slots

VOTE: petapan

you know what, I changed my mind
VOTE: Nero

there is no way, noooo way that you spend this much time as town going through every single one of my posts, arguing about very little technicalities and inconsequential wording, quality it as "WTF" and that I'm "full of shit", only to settle on peta afterwards, after saying that you're not "worried about the day lynch" (???), I refuse to believe it

In post 847, Save The Dragons wrote:i originally like titus's posts but some recent things have bothered me

In post 848, petapan wrote:like what specifically

In post 849, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 636, Titus wrote:@STD, Are you trying to annoy me?

the phrasing bothered me i dunno how to put it but i don't understand why i got called out for my three posts in a row and then osuka posts

In post 661, osuka wrote:toniiiiiiight

In post 662, osuka wrote:im gonna have myself a real good time

In post 663, osuka wrote:i feel ali i I IIIIIVE

In post 664, osuka wrote:i'm gonna catch up here in a second, so

In post 665, osuka wrote:don't

In post 666, osuka wrote:stop

In post 667, osuka wrote:me

In post 668, osuka wrote:nooooow

and Titus doesn't bat an eye

I feel like that would be a much stronger argument if Titus didn't go immediately VLA after that so it could just be inactivity, but good observation

In post 840, petapan wrote:nah this is fucking weasel shit dude

holy shit no.

I think it was pretty clear what I was asking.

In 818 you said all the wagons were dead.

In 825 I pointed out that you failed to join the wagons of two players that you think are "not especially towny"

but OMG

O

MUH

MITH

I used the s word and didn't use the particular nomenclature you used.

OMG THE HORROR!

It's not a misrep or anything b/c the whole point was that you failed to join the wagons you said you'd be willing to join.

In post 836, petapan wrote:you are just actively trying to twist everything i say

the fuck I am. You cried that all the wagons are dead when you are not helping to wagon build.

In post 855, nomnomnom wrote:there is no way, noooo way that you spend this much time as town going through every single one of my posts, arguing about very little technicalities and inconsequential wording, quality it as "WTF" and that I'm "full of shit", only to settle on peta afterwards, after saying that you're not "worried about the day lynch" (???), I refuse to believe it

there are 6 days to get a lynch and alot of people are barely playing and many to catch up and give content. I don't think its particularly important that we decide the lynch right now. Also, by joining the Peta wagon I was joining the largest wagon. Nothing says I have to vote you just b/c I'm posting about you.

In post 847, Save The Dragons wrote:i originally like titus's posts but some recent things have bothered me

i meant why are you voting DW

I feel like there's some scum motivation in trying to make this game stagnant and I think it's likely scum are posting less on purpose. And I think that peta sitting on a dead wagon would certainly help with a game being stagnant and I particularly hated 829.

I felt like his reaction was scummy b/c it's hypocritical to me to argue that the wagons are dead and he didn't know where to vote but failed to join the ssbm wagon and the emerging DOTW wagon. Yes, he finally gave some reasoning but I'm not sure why he reacted so violently at first.

It also seems odd that he had no problem vanity voting Anya but when the ssbm wagon was a think he claims he was hesitant.

Perhaps this is nooby arrogance and he can't handle any criticism at all.

855 is likely a scum post since its sheeping Rathe's reasoning (not that Rathe said he suspects me for it but nom thinks rathe will prob vote me)

[post=nom]nom[/post]

lol

VOTE: nom

Your entirety of your actions towards me have been nitpicking my wording, asking me ridiculous stuff (like trying to find a post in the thousand posts I have made across my games here to find a mention of something completely insignificant) to try and discredit me, playstyle based votes and ascribing all my reads and votes to "someone else did it first so it means you're scum"
That and ridiculous "what if" theories to confirm your confbiases without ever reconsidering once
So either you are being ridiculous town, or you're just scum, and the latter is just the simpler theory

And now you vote me knowing full well that the two posts I highlighted are scummy as hell and going back on your "my vote doesn't matter right now!!" and "I'm just voting the most popular wagon guise!!" all of a sudden

Saying that I only voted you because "I think rathe would vote there" is completely nonsensical posting considering that Rathe is literally the leading vote on my wagon and thinks I am scum
Ridiculous moonlogic

Weekend stuff
I'll post later

nom and nero are tvt.

Nero can you pick a different person from your list to vote? Not feeling this one.

In post 764, Anya wrote:i've lost all passion and energy i think i need a mafia break after this game

VOTE: dragon of the west sheeping my neighbour bc he's town with a good read or is bussing

This take makes no sense to me. You sheeping would mean you just blindly trust kyo's vote which would require them to be town...but then you say they might be bussing. Do you think they're town or not and if you think they might not be why are you so sure that scum!Kyo would only be bussing instead of voting someone they know is town?

In post 801, petapan wrote: yes, well, there is obvious incentive for scum to fake scumhunting in that situation. in a situation where neither are in a hood, claiming to be in a hood together is a terrible play because if one ever flips the other is doomed. it's not a gambit anyone realistically attempts

I'm fucking stupid I didn't think about how them being 'neighbor' would be shown in their role if either of them flipped. Still, since they're the only 2 in the hood they could both just be scum. I just hate everything about their interactions/explanations

I don't want to think about the neighbors right now.

In post 866, T3 wrote:nom and nero are tvt.

Nah, Nero is scum.

In post 870, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't want to think about the neighbors right now.

Well I do because they are both scum.

Traitor traitor again? Or is it scum traitor or is it scum scum? Which you liking the best?

VOTE:

In post 869, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 801, petapan wrote: yes, well, there is obvious incentive for scum to fake scumhunting in that situation. in a situation where neither are in a hood, claiming to be in a hood together is a terrible play because if one ever flips the other is doomed. it's not a gambit anyone realistically attempts

I'm fucking stupid I didn't think about how them being 'neighbor' would be shown in their role if either of them flipped. Still, since they're the only 2 in the hood they could both just be scum. I just hate everything about their interactions/explanations

That's the site meta these days, it's probably some amti-town landmine from the mod.

But neither look town.

Especially given how quickly in the game Anya started to flex being a neighbor and making a huge theatrical production of it.

That REEKS of scum neighbors so bad.

VOTE: Anya

This slot needs to be cleansed with a flame thrower.