Mafiascum.net

In post 841, Rannygazoo wrote:There’s no reason for the cop to hold back now. If the cop is real, it’s either Titus or VFP.

After yesterday, I don’t even want to vote until everyone has said what they need to.

I'm not cop

In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.

you were on the wagon yesterday. i trust your theory about as far as i can throw an elephant...

I'm not really liking T3 here, and I'm starting to have buyer's remorse defending him. I need something to read him off of. Maybe a dive into his ISO will help me? Yeah, I'll go do that.

In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.

The cop will most likely have used both of their shots by now, so how does this help? Wouldn't it just make us risk losing the peeks?

In post 853, Egix96 wrote:

In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.

The cop will most likely have used both of their shots by now, so how does this help? Wouldn't it just make us risk losing the peeks?

No. Even if the cop dies it still helps us. I know this sounds like it makes no sense.

If the cop dies, then we don't get a (presumed) green check

In post 854, T3 wrote:

In post 853, Egix96 wrote:

In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.

The cop will most likely have used both of their shots by now, so how does this help? Wouldn't it just make us risk losing the peeks?

No. Even if the cop dies it still helps us. I know this sounds like it makes no sense.

How?

In post 854, T3 wrote:

In post 853, Egix96 wrote:

In post 849, T3 wrote:I have a theory. Now I know the last time I said this we ended up limming the doctor but I have a theory.
All the other prs out today.
The cop claims vt,the outs tomorrow.

The cop will most likely have used both of their shots by now, so how does this help? Wouldn't it just make us risk losing the peeks?

No. Even if the cop dies it still helps us. I know this sounds like it makes no sense.

T3, if we don't confirm that the 2 shot Cop exists today, we 100% have to shoot you. That's just how it is at this point. There are zero reasons for the Cop to stay silent since they can't offer anything else Night 3 onwards with their role.

I'm not a cop.

I'm still not scumhunting for mental health but I don't want to delay the game.

Agreed with Roden.

Here's one way day 3 might have gone: scum!T3 realizes his day 1 gambit has come to an end, so he gets a scum buddy to fake claim cop in order to give them both credibility. I didn't put this out there because I didn't want to discourage anyone from claiming cop.

However, the only possibility left for a cop claim is Titus, and I don't think she's scum with T3 because of how she was pushing him day 1 and day 2. (I mean, maybe she is. I found her rationale for voting T3 to be unconvincing, and maybe that was on purpose. I just don't think it's likely.)

So I guess we just have to wait and see.

p-edit: welp, thanks for chiming in, Titus.

I'll vote when everyone says what they need to say about their role claims.

I wonder if scumT3 was just trying to out a cop and the informed is that there's a macho in the game? (Just a scum informed of course)
The 2 shot is irrelevant at that stage as it could be argued as giving false information to trick scum.

In post 861, VFP wrote:The 2 shot is irrelevant at that stage as it could be argued as giving false information to trick scum.

The mod cannot lie to scum. That would not be normal.

In post 862, Titus wrote:

In post 861, VFP wrote:The 2 shot is irrelevant at that stage as it could be argued as giving false information to trick scum.

The mod cannot lie to scum. That would not be normal.

I'm talking about T3 claiming to lie as town to trick scum.

Why are you telling T3 how to bail himself out?

Well if T3 uses it for the reasoning I'm insta locking my vote.
So it's not really bailing.

I don't think that bails T3 out unless X happened. I'm not saying X.

I think T3's plan, if scum, would be a refuge in audacity. Why would scum make such a bold claim? To make you doubt that they are scum.

I'm just not sure why he made a claim that needs an answer in two days. Like, I'm guessing he hoped a scum buddy would take up the fake claim, that makes sense. But now they're just leaving him hanging? The only thing I can assume at this point is that scum might be more associated with each other than we thought, and that it's worth losing T3 over ultimately outing themselves if something goes wrong. Jake and I possibly spooked them with our role hints, maybe.

Before I say what I know, I'm giving one last chance for the 2 shot Cop to step forward. If you exist but stay quiet, then you are condemning T3 who you know would have to be Town.

In post 867, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I think T3's plan, if scum, would be a refuge in audacity. Why would scum make such a bold claim? To make you doubt that they are scum.

At this point, yeah, it seems like he's trying to buy himself another day.

I also would vote T3, and I am having a hard time reading VFP as town. I would yeet T3, too.

I mean I could vote T3 or VFP.

I would really appreciate not voting VFP here.

Ok then.

In post 565, Jake The Wolfie wrote:I am a mason vig with ranny, and I will 100% shoot him if you self-vote here.

Currently reading through ISOs. Was there any truth to this?