Mafiascum.net

In post 845, Shrek wrote:

In post 844, Roden wrote:Actually I kinda wanna reiterate that Shrek should be a competing wagon right now.

bruh

How do you read me asking you a hypothetical question as me distancing from T3? I'm asking you why you don't suspect scum theatre in the first place, and your response to that is...obviously I'm trying to hide my own scum theatre? Lmao

VOTE: Shrek

In post 844, Roden wrote:Actually I kinda wanna reiterate that Shrek should be a competing wagon right now.

Why?

In post 850, Roden wrote:

In post 845, Shrek wrote:

In post 844, Roden wrote:Actually I kinda wanna reiterate that Shrek should be a competing wagon right now.

bruh

How do you read me asking you a hypothetical question as me distancing from T3? I'm asking you why you don't suspect scum theatre in the first place, and your response to that is...obviously I'm trying to hide my own scum theatre? Lmao

VOTE: Shrek

you were asking if you and nero could be scum theatre or t3 and nero could be scum theatre in response to me saying that i dont think that the group of t3/nero/you had more than 1 scum in it (which was a big while back now) and youre misconstruing my point as me saying youre scum theatreing with him. like you dont bring up the possibility of nero not being scum there but then quickly shift off of his wagon and onto testarossa as soon as it becomes clear that his wagon is bad and pointless

also your omgus makes me think im right

how likely is it that t3/roden/testarossa are scumbuddies

Gotta say i have a townlean on Shrek right now.

In post 851, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 844, Roden wrote:Actually I kinda wanna reiterate that Shrek should be a competing wagon right now.

Why?

I originally wanted to because he should've been anyway, but it was also brought up that he's a lurker who has managed to post a bit more than the other lurkers while still having completely unmemorable posting. Now I think he's projecting that I'm trying to get him to argue with Nero, since Shrek is the only scum read I 100% agree with Nero on, so idk how he could interpret it that way.

In post 852, Shrek wrote:

In post 850, Roden wrote:

In post 845, Shrek wrote:

In post 844, Roden wrote:Actually I kinda wanna reiterate that Shrek should be a competing wagon right now.

bruh

How do you read me asking you a hypothetical question as me distancing from T3? I'm asking you why you don't suspect scum theatre in the first place, and your response to that is...obviously I'm trying to hide my own scum theatre? Lmao

VOTE: Shrek

you were asking if you and nero could be scum theatre or t3 and nero could be scum theatre in response to me saying that i dont think that the group of t3/nero/you had more than 1 scum in it (which was a big while back now) and youre misconstruing my point as me saying youre scum theatreing with him. like you dont bring up the possibility of nero not being scum there but then quickly shift off of his wagon and onto testarossa as soon as it becomes clear that his wagon is bad and pointless

also your omgus makes me think im right

Of course I shifted off Nero's wagon because it was pointless, why would I stay there as a vanity vote when I agreed we needed to pressure more people? Why are you acting like my vote on Testa is scummy when you're voting Testa?

im not saying that you shifted off of it for being pointless, it just came less than 10 minutes after you were criticizing him for tunneling and focusing on you which makes it seem like it was very on the nose. and my vote for testa is because i legitimately think that she's scum and has been on her for a while, while your vote for testa is part of a sudden wagon and you essentially admit that you dont want to see her flip today anyway

I'm genuinely baffled that somebody could straight face say that voting a certain player is scummy when they're currently voting that exact person.

I'll be honest I'm kind of toasted right now so maybe that'll make sense when I read it again in the morning, but this take is really """interesting"""

In post 857, Roden wrote:I'm genuinely baffled that somebody could straight face say that voting a certain player is scummy when they're currently voting that exact person.

I'll be honest I'm kind of toasted right now so maybe that'll make sense when I read it again in the morning, but this take is really """interesting"""

youre literally purposefully ignoring that the circumstances under which we voted testarossa are completely different bruh

:/ my wagon was dying maybe but it wasn't dead. I'm p sure that all of mega, gamma, t3 and arc are there.bcallingbur vote on me a vanity vote and arguing that u needed to switch wagons is umm crazy

In post 856, Shrek wrote:im not saying that you shifted off of it for being pointless, it just came less than 10 minutes after you were criticizing him for tunneling and focusing on you which makes it seem like it was very on the nose. and my vote for testa is because i legitimately think that she's scum and has been on her for a while, while your vote for testa is part of a sudden wagon and you essentially admit that you dont want to see her flip today anyway

Ehhhh ok maybe I'm just not good to post right now, this does sound more reasonable, my bad. I shifted off Nero because I didn't think I was getting much more content, and I wasn't confident or spiteful enough to 1v1.

I'm not super into flipping Testa as a priority no, my vote was just to wagon and see if there was resistance. The only notable thing so far is that Cheeky swapped out and T3 gained the lead, but I'm town reading Cheeky so I don't think anything AI has happened yet.

I kinda felt like Shrek is scummy but it's hard to scum read him.

In post 858, Shrek wrote:

In post 857, Roden wrote:I'm genuinely baffled that somebody could straight face say that voting a certain player is scummy when they're currently voting that exact person.

I'll be honest I'm kind of toasted right now so maybe that'll make sense when I read it again in the morning, but this take is really """interesting"""

youre literally purposefully ignoring that the circumstances under which we voted testarossa are completely different bruh

I'm not? I didn't bring it up I guess but I don't think it matters if we vote for the same person. You just scum read her more than I do.

In post 859, Nero Cain wrote::/ my wagon was dying maybe but it wasn't dead. I'm p sure that all of mega, gamma, t3 and arc are there.bcallingbur vote on me a vanity vote and arguing that u needed to switch wagons is umm crazy

What's crazy about switching wagons? Town gains info on who, why, and when people switch to certain wagons. I'm personally not good at catching scummy intent with votes, so I look to see what wagons get resisted. Testa and T3 both got votes pretty easily, and some people had FOS on Shrek so I want to see who'd also wagon him.

You know what's weird. Noone is scumreading me O_O

I mean, you did claim Mason.

In post 863, CheekyTeeky wrote:You know what's weird. Noone is scumreading me O_O

You can be scum in my heart.

Touché

In post 67, T3 wrote:

In post 51, Shrek wrote:also can someone explain to me what powerball and mountainous games are plox

The Powerball lottery is a lot of money

In post 68, Shrek wrote:someone already made that joke bruh

T3/Shrek unlikely buddies.

In post 812, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 807, CheekyTeeky wrote:The play by play gave me town fuzzies.

In post 808, CheekyTeeky wrote:Maybs it's just T3, Kitty, Testa and a mystery scumbutt like AA9.

I don’t think Kitty is scum rn
Last time I played with Kitty!scum she crashed and burned kinda quickly, she may be suspicious but unless I see signs of her previous scumgame I’m not gonna yeet her, at least D1
Plus she’s townpinged me a little bit so far

Why she, my pronoun is written right there. And yeah I accidentally self-destructed that game because I panicked.

In post 831, CheekyTeeky wrote:Shrek is either new town or scum playing at being new town which is lame so I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt.

Shrek seems a bit like Not_Mafia: slightly lurky troll by playstyle. Really hard to read. But somewhat less of a troll than N_M.

In post 868, KittyTacky wrote:Shrek seems a bit like Not_Mafia

Not in the slightest imo.

In post 830, CheekyTeeky wrote:Gamma are you still scumreading Nero?

Yes
Despite being given numerous chances to do otherwise he has consistently taken the low road on his read of me

In post 806, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 804, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:gamma is getting away with an equally (and maybe even worse) "meta" read

That's rich.

How so?

You routinely get away with bad meta reads.

In post 806, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 804, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:gamma is getting away with an equally (and maybe even worse) "meta" read

That's rich.

How so?

In post 810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 803, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 795, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is cool but please spare us the play-by-play

I will do as I please, you are not the gatekeeper of my posts.

You literally went over the same point twice in two consecutive posts
If you’re going to do that, do that in private rather than spamming the thread with it

The repetition was a clerical error.

Is the play by play making your scumpals nervous?

In post 863, CheekyTeeky wrote:You know what's weird. Noone is scumreading me O_O

I’m slightly surprised too but you’re not playing like you did in LN 231 which was probably the last quote of a few of these players saw of scum!you

In post 872, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 806, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 804, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 801, Nero Cain wrote:gamma is getting away with an equally (and maybe even worse) "meta" read

That's rich.

How so?

In post 810, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 803, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 795, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is cool but please spare us the play-by-play

I will do as I please, you are not the gatekeeper of my posts.

You literally went over the same point twice in two consecutive posts
If you’re going to do that, do that in private rather than spamming the thread with it

The repetition was a clerical error.

Is the play by play making your scumpals nervous?

. You shouldn’t have to ask if it’s making my scum partners nervous, I’d probably already be imploding