Mafiascum.net

silly, silly i dont do meta! you should know that t3 ^.^

i might be too lenient, but i do love emotions

In post 849, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 848, T3 wrote:

In post 835, marcistar wrote:dont think grandpamos scum tbh.

In post 842, marcistar wrote:

In post 838, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 837, marcistar wrote:i think grandpamo looks better from it, but i dont necessarily think gammas scum tbh.

honestly. im REALLY trying to see a world where gamma is town btw.

like if its not obvious, im giving gamma to give me a chance to prove to her that they are town, but they havent like fucking jusfitied anything!!!! and its kinda frustrating ((

i cant really towncase him to help, so sorry
its just like, vibes right now, but its not something im too confident in the grand scheme of things.

i do see how frustrated you are though, and thats what feels town in you. you came up with a meta case, which you didn't really need to do in

this

game as scum, since you could prob just slide by a bit longer since nobody else is really doing anything, or could've just as well came up with a "i was busy uwu im so sorry guys" sort of excuse. its an awful lot of effort for scum to make. you stuck out your neck for reason.

You should see Open 810.

there is a difference tho. u should know this. in open 810 i defended my team mate and came up with these long ass wall posts on why this person was scum and why this person was town. I did this as a last minute pivot. no one pivoted tho, so i defended my mafia and try to pivot onto my mafia person.

look at that iso vs this see the differences.

in this game, i was just bringing my scumcase on someone just like i do on all my town games + giving soft reads before + after. gave my reads on hockey, std, and titus before that scumcase

In post 850, marcistar wrote:silly, silly i dont do meta! you should know that t3 ^.^

i might be too lenient, but i do love emotions

Okay hm wait this might actually make sense

In post 833, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 831, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 827, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 826, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not even going to engage that except to say Situation Room is not comparable to here
It’s also convenient you list 2 scum games when I was winding up to delivery a whooping based on bad interpretation of my town games

Lol k.

U ignore the first game.

Ur excuse for the 2 other games, idek what that means, i listed 2 scum games, and you are playing similarly to this game. you still have not justified anything, and it just furthering my conf bias. if ur town ur still not making me believe you are town. u are just stuck with an omgus on me thinking im scum.

Idc
You’ve been a suspect for me since you started on this path of shading my questioning, the meta BS just cemented the bad vibes

LOL WTF. u still CONTINUE to deflect the conversation and FINALLY scumread me of a line of reasoning. call me scum because me asking ur weird questioning. do you want to know why i was asking? because ive seen you do this on ur scumgames. i quoted proof, so u cant call bs.

also u never followed up on any of ur questions. what town asks questions to ppl and never following up on them.

I feel like I’ve followed up but you still beat the same dead horse that I’ve stated has only ever come up when I’ve been town, and I actually followed up a question I asked you and you consistently dodged it so you’re just driving the nail even further into your coffin with that crap
That’s why I’m not engaging you now, it’s just more shit you’re throwing out to act like you’re solving when you’re not
If you legit think I’m scum, why are you debating it with me? The smart thing would be to present the logic to others, but instead you’re trying to get me to concede that you have a point.
I had realized a difference between this game and Newbie 2074 as well and wasn’t sure if a good time to bring it up would arrive but this sure as hell is one. I actually was not passive AT ALL in Newbie 2074, instead I tried to start fires by fueling conflicts. The reason why it’s fitting to mention it here is you’re playing the same way I did there, especially D1: locking onto a slot and trying to pummel it into submission.

In post 838, GrandpaMo wrote:honestly. im REALLY trying to see a world where gamma is town btw.

This is not true, or at least he’s not acting like it

In post 802, T3 wrote:

In post 747, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 724, T3 wrote:

In post 722, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

"I've never seen scum gambit" isn't really enough for me

This isn't the kind of gambit scum does though.

Please stop overthinking this and just do what's clearly GTO. We stop talking about it and get a claim tomorrow if the slot's alive, then evaluate from there, I think we can agree on that much at least

In post 818, T3 wrote:Also sb9 can you not vote park on me thanks

In post 855, T3 wrote:

how does gamma respond to a tunnel: a metadive in progress

I can literally link the game where ThorHead became a thing for me
Because if you’re sticking to recent games imma stop you right there since I can’t recall any games in the recent past where I’ve had this reaction but further back there’s at least the one I can recall

In post 857, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 818, T3 wrote:Also sb9 can you not vote park on me thanks

Town Gamma in LN235 was tunneled by Nero. He tried to engage with Nero but then when Nero kept scumreading him for what be saw was irrational he just ignored Nero.

The car is not moving out of park until I stop wanting to lim you T3

If you want to just save some time gamma's town

In post 853, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 833, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 831, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 827, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 826, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’m not even going to engage that except to say Situation Room is not comparable to here
It’s also convenient you list 2 scum games when I was winding up to delivery a whooping based on bad interpretation of my town games

Lol k.

U ignore the first game.

Ur excuse for the 2 other games, idek what that means, i listed 2 scum games, and you are playing similarly to this game. you still have not justified anything, and it just furthering my conf bias. if ur town ur still not making me believe you are town. u are just stuck with an omgus on me thinking im scum.

Idc
You’ve been a suspect for me since you started on this path of shading my questioning, the meta BS just cemented the bad vibes

LOL WTF. u still CONTINUE to deflect the conversation and FINALLY scumread me of a line of reasoning. call me scum because me asking ur weird questioning. do you want to know why i was asking? because ive seen you do this on ur scumgames. i quoted proof, so u cant call bs.

also u never followed up on any of ur questions. what town asks questions to ppl and never following up on them.

I feel like I’ve followed up but you still beat the same dead horse that I’ve stated has only ever come up when I’ve been town, and I actually followed up a question I asked you and you consistently dodged it so you’re just driving the nail even further into your coffin with that crap
That’s why I’m not engaging you now, it’s just more shit you’re throwing out to act like you’re solving when you’re not
If you legit think I’m scum, why are you debating it with me? The smart thing would be to present the logic to others, but instead you’re trying to get me to concede that you have a point.
I had realized a difference between this game and Newbie 2074 as well and wasn’t sure if a good time to bring it up would arrive but this sure as hell is one. I actually was not passive AT ALL in Newbie 2074, instead I tried to start fires by fueling conflicts. The reason why it’s fitting to mention it here is you’re playing the same way I did there, especially D1: locking onto a slot and trying to pummel it into submission.

Very similar reaction to Grandpa this game, albeit condensed in one post.

In post 842, marcistar wrote:

In post 838, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 837, marcistar wrote:i think grandpamo looks better from it, but i dont necessarily think gammas scum tbh.

honestly. im REALLY trying to see a world where gamma is town btw.

like if its not obvious, im giving gamma to give me a chance to prove to her that they are town, but they havent like fucking jusfitied anything!!!! and its kinda frustrating ((

i cant really towncase him to help, so sorry
its just like, vibes right now, but its not something im too confident in the grand scheme of things.

i do see how frustrated you are though, and thats what feels town in you. you came up with a meta case, which you didn't really need to do in

this

game as scum, since you could prob just slide by a bit longer since nobody else is really doing anything, or could've just as well came up with a "i was busy uwu im so sorry guys" sort of excuse. its an awful lot of effort for scum to make. you stuck out your neck for reason.

I’m pretty sure you’re wrong about GMo. Not only does GMo’s play resemble how played in Newbie 2074, his previous play resembles my in that game. ClarkBar barely posted and was lowkey sus for some people. The lacking presence GMo has had for most of this game matches that lackluster performance to a T.
There’s also the fact he’s constantly been a ball of excuses for how he couldn’t actually deliver the content he’s been promising, something I’ve tried to guide him back on track on when it came to what he promised me, but instead he’s ghosting me while pretending I’m the bad guy in this relationship.

In post 861, superbowl9 wrote:The car is not moving out of park until I stop wanting to lim you T3

The car will have to be towed.

In post 865, T3 wrote:

In post 861, superbowl9 wrote:The car is not moving out of park until I stop wanting to lim you T3

The car will have to be towed.

What are you gonna do vote me? Start being townier and I'll gladly move elsewhere

In post 859, T3 wrote:

In post 857, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 818, T3 wrote:Also sb9 can you not vote park on me thanks

how does gamma react to a thought-out tunnel: a revised metadive in progres

Did you mean to quote that

In post 860, T3 wrote:Town Gamma in LN235 was tunneled by Nero. He tried to engage with Nero but then when Nero kept scumreading him for what be saw was irrational he just ignored Nero.

Eh that’s more-or-less true but the read on Nero is different than how I’m reading GMo here

In post 866, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 865, T3 wrote:

In post 861, superbowl9 wrote:The car is not moving out of park until I stop wanting to lim you T3

The car will have to be towed.

What are you gonna do vote me? Start being townier and I'll gladly move elsewhere

But...he has been towny

In post 868, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 866, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 865, T3 wrote:

In post 861, superbowl9 wrote:The car is not moving out of park until I stop wanting to lim you T3

The car will have to be towed.

What are you gonna do vote me? Start being townier and I'll gladly move elsewhere

But...he has been towny

OH i didn't realize that sorry let me remove my vote
Sorry i didnt mean that pls forgive me

In post 856, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 802, T3 wrote:

In post 747, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 724, T3 wrote:

In post 722, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

"I've never seen scum gambit" isn't really enough for me

This isn't the kind of gambit scum does though.

Please stop overthinking this and just do what's clearly GTO. We stop talking about it and get a claim tomorrow if the slot's alive, then evaluate from there, I think we can agree on that much at least

Why are you so set on getting me to claim tomorrow?

In post 856, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 802, T3 wrote:

In post 747, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 724, T3 wrote:

In post 722, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

"I've never seen scum gambit" isn't really enough for me

This isn't the kind of gambit scum does though.

Please stop overthinking this and just do what's clearly GTO. We stop talking about it and get a claim tomorrow if the slot's alive, then evaluate from there, I think we can agree on that much at least

This is something I actually feel confident I can defend T3 on
While his theory is probably not entirely correct in practice, I know T3 has said similar before, and as such unless there was a game I am not presently aware of where something happened to contradict that belief it would make sense he’s still thinking this

In post 862, superbowl9 wrote:If you want to just save some time gamma's town

so u think Gpas mafia right?

Also,

nvm im moving my vote over here rn

VOTE: Kop

the wagon orignally started out too fast but it kinda just dissipated when kops recent posting wasnt even towny

In post 828, HockeyFan wrote:lol, ok, so I saw the wagon formation on SF and thought scum were on it, But idt all 3 scum would buddy up together on a wagon like that. So there was probs 1-2 scum on it right? Yea... so I made the conclusion that t3 is probs town so the others 2 are scum. When did i narrow it down to one of them? I said either one OR both.

That's the thing though. It sounded like you had 3 scum on it or maybe I just misread. So I saw the leap from 3 to 1 and thought what? If I look at it now, I can maybe see what you're talking about, so I'm not going to push it further. At the time I probably wasn't reading it as generously as I probably should. But now that I look at your response here, I see you say that you reached the conclusion that t3 is probably town so the other 2 are scum. But you're NOT saying that, you're saying it could be 1 or 2 of the others as scum. So again, maybe my misreading, maybe your inconsistency. Not sure where that goes rn.

Now think about this, if we're in a regualr mini normail where it's 10-3, how often have you seen two scum back-to-back on an early day wagon? And you kinda did narrow it down to one of them. I dunno. It may be a distinction without a difference, but it's and inconsistent thought process, which is probably more likely not scummy. Caveat being would scum do that and you know how that goes.

Man reading those two paragraphs I just wrote hurts my head.

In post 873, Galron wrote:

In post 828, HockeyFan wrote:lol, ok, so I saw the wagon formation on SF and thought scum were on it, But idt all 3 scum would buddy up together on a wagon like that. So there was probs 1-2 scum on it right? Yea... so I made the conclusion that t3 is probs town so the others 2 are scum. When did i narrow it down to one of them? I said either one OR both.

That's the thing though. It sounded like you had 3 scum on it or maybe I just misread. So I saw the leap from 3 to 1 and thought what? If I look at it now, I can maybe see what you're talking about, so I'm not going to push it further. At the time I probably wasn't reading it as generously as I probably should. But now that I look at your response here, I see you say that you reached the conclusion that t3 is probably town so the other 2 are scum. But you're NOT saying that, you're saying it could be 1 or 2 of the others as scum. So again, maybe my misreading, maybe your inconsistency. Not sure where that goes rn.

Now think about this, if we're in a regualr mini normail where it's 10-3, how often have you seen two scum back-to-back on an early day wagon? And you kinda did narrow it down to one of them. I dunno. It may be a distinction without a difference, but it's and inconsistent thought process, which is probably more likely not scummy. Caveat being would scum do that and you know how that goes.

Man reading those two paragraphs I just wrote hurts my head.

Yea i also dont understand what your 2nd paragraph is saying? Do you mean u think they wouldnt buddy up on a wagon so quickly? Cuz that is fair, but they could so eailly do it here cuz its early D1 and they face little to no reprecussions for doing so