Page 35 of 93
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:30 am
by T3
In post 775, Almost50 wrote:Also, here's a BIG FAVOUR I ask of you all: I am not going to take down notes and stuff, so you should collectively try to remind me why I TR'd/SR'd someone. Help an old guy, will you all?
A50 posting this much is probably town indicative.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:30 am
by fua
In post 846, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 837, fua wrote: In post 834, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 831, fua wrote:Reading through your post it feels like the main reason you’re scumreading him is because he’s townreading you despite your meta? I don’t know your meta, so I’m not really able to see things the same way you are.
No, the main thing is the beginning of his ISO. I don't do meta, my point is that the townread on me for thinking I look scummy doesn't make much sense unless he is familiar with my playstyle
Is he familiar with your playstyle though?
I have never heard of three so... no
Oh yeah, then that makes more sense. I don’t think I can personally determine whether it’s just WIFOM or not, though. I still want to give him the benefit of the doubt and focus on more than just Three today so we can get info.
How is he associated with Jacket, by the way? I must have missed that.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:32 am
by Dwlee99
In post 851, fua wrote:How is he associated with Jacket, by the way? I must have missed that.
Is this to me?
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:32 am
by T3
In post 789, Almost50 wrote:In fact, why not NOW:
I am a Town BP Neighbour. At first, I though being a Neighbour was to make me a Miller to a TA/PT Cop (as is the fad), but with that claim it makes more sense for me to be the Miller for the Complex Vig. I mean, without the Neighborhood I could just claim VT if redtea claims to have shot me. However, if I do get shot in this case; my Neighbour will out me as their Neighbour and thus a PR who should have been dead.
@Dwlee: happy now?? Now Scum won't try to shoot me on N1 (or any other night). THAT IS WHY I don't feel the need to out everything I know upon "someone's request".
This is real. Trust me.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:32 am
by fua
In post 802, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Three
I think Jacket's opinions seem unsafe if he is scum
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:33 am
by T3
In post 813, Almost50 wrote:So, obviously my theory about Dwlee being Traitor with T3, George & STD has hit a brick wall.
Current read list (as of page 17):
Almost50, replaced Wake88 (BP NEighbour)
cool cookie (Informed)
redtea (Complex Vig)
House
T3
fua
TheZenMan*
Save The Dragons
GeorgeBailey*
Dwlee99, replaced Osetr
HawaiianPizza
Three
Jacket
Note that names within the same category are NOT following a particular order (maybe the ones in the NULL are, because that's where I started from, so they are in the order the mod lisyed them on P0)
The are
never
4 scum in a mini normal.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:34 am
by Dwlee99
People we're voting jacket so I was responding to that and going to a different wagon
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:34 am
by Dwlee99
Were*
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:34 am
by T3
In post 818, Jacket wrote:Should note that regardless of what T3 says, Save The Dragons feels very underwhelming.
Yes, he is underwhelming.
Underwhelming =/= scum.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:35 am
by fua
Oh, so I just misunderstood, then. I thought you were referring to Three when you said ‘if he is scum’.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:35 am
by T3
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:36 am
by T3
UNVOTE: dwlee
hi
I voted you because bad reasons
I unvoted you because you voted someone else
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:36 am
by fua
What parts of his meta explain his alignment here? Does scum StD not act this way?
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:38 am
by Dwlee99
In post 859, fua wrote:Oh, so I just misunderstood, then. I thought you were referring to Three when you said ‘if he is scum’.
Oh he was jacket
In post 861, T3 wrote:
UNVOTE: dwlee
hi
I voted you because bad reasons
I unvoted you because you voted someone else
It wasn't an awful reason. A50 must have confirmed to be announced which I thought meant he should be around.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:45 am
by Almost50
Welcome aboard, monkeyman. FYI, you're expected to form accurate reads on all slots by the time you make your opening post. Either that or you will be shot out of the galaxy. Note that if we mislim.. you're Scum. If we lim Scum.. you bussed. If you weren't on the wagon.. you tried to protect a p. Basically anything you say or do (or don't) will get you SR'd by someone or another. GET USED TO IT!
P.S. Did anyone Scum read me already in the upcoming pages? I can't wait to see it.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:52 am
by TheZenMan
In post 863, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 859, fua wrote:Oh, so I just misunderstood, then. I thought you were referring to Three when you said ‘if he is scum’.
Oh he was jacket
In post 861, T3 wrote:
UNVOTE: dwlee
hi
I voted you because bad reasons
I unvoted you because you voted someone else
It wasn't an awful reason. A50 must have confirmed to be announced which I thought meant he should be around.
Like A50 said, takes time to read through the thread.
And like I said before, you should have voted for me since I was someone that had atleast commented in thread before, then basically vanished. That would have been a kind of easy push, but still a legitimate one. Going after A50 seemed like you just picked someone without any comment as an easy/safe elim target to push, but without much reprucussions.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:57 am
by Dwlee99
Do you think my vote on a50 there could have led even close to an elimination unless he lurked out for the next 3 days?
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:58 am
by Almost50
In post 602, House wrote:1) Why would the mod give info not only about the existence of a traitor, but the fact they're bulletproof? What town utility comes from outing the fact the traitor is bulletproof?
cookie could have left the bulletproof bit out of his claim and let mafia sweat hitting their traitor at night, or think they're traitor was being protected if they did shoot them.
Mentioning the bulletproof bit could have easily been a message from traitor!cookie to his team.
If I had a 1% uncertain part of me about you being Town, it's evaporated now.
Let me think about this though
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 3:58 am
by Dwlee99
I'm familiar with a50. I know he typically comes in posting a bunch. I gave him a kick and he delivered
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:01 am
by TheZenMan
In post 866, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you think my vote on a50 there could have led even close to an elimination unless he lurked out for the next 3 days?
Not saying it could have led to an elim, I'm saying it's a very easy push to give yourself some towncred. And imo it was also the wrong push, since I was a better target for it.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:03 am
by fua
I feel like Dwlee’s vote was for meta reasons rather than just inactivity alone.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:06 am
by Dwlee99
Everytime someone says meta take a shot
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:06 am
by Almost50
Some of us simians are into really odd habits, such as sleeping.
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:07 am
by Dwlee99
In post 869, TheZenMan wrote: In post 866, Dwlee99 wrote:Do you think my vote on a50 there could have led even close to an elimination unless he lurked out for the next 3 days?
Not saying it could have led to an elim, I'm saying it's a very easy push to give yourself some towncred. And imo it was also the wrong push, since I was a better target for it.
I don't see how voting a lurker gives me town cred in any world. I'm pretty sure everytime I do it someone complains
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2021 4:16 am
by Save The Dragons
In post 858, T3 wrote: In post 818, Jacket wrote:Should note that regardless of what T3 says, Save The Dragons feels very underwhelming.
Yes, he is underwhelming.
Underwhelming =/= scum.
