I'm fine with anyone who isn't dark green being the d1 execution.In post 567, House wrote:House
innocentvillager
VP Baltar
Frogsterking
Aristeia
Datisi
Laplacian
OutWorldER
Reformed Toxic Player
Something_Smart
Andresvmb
skitter30
Almost50
Since your on VP, I want to clarify, are you still/were you ever townreading House and Skitter?In post 851, VP Baltar wrote:House, why is andres so low on your list?
Yeah, I think they are probably both town.In post 852, Frogsterking wrote:Since your on VP, I want to clarify, are you still/were you ever townreading House and Skitter?In post 851, VP Baltar wrote:House, why is andres so low on your list?
Okay our reads are close enough to work together then. I'm planning to post an updated reads list later tonight in a similar format to House.In post 853, VP Baltar wrote:Yeah, I think they are probably both town.In post 852, Frogsterking wrote:Since your on VP, I want to clarify, are you still/were you ever townreading House and Skitter?In post 851, VP Baltar wrote:House, why is andres so low on your list?
Coming back to this...there are several people not mentioned in IV's list (me, andres, Outworld, SS, etc).In post 684, Datisi wrote:the fact that i think iv is much less paranoid of vp so he stops me from spiraling into a paranoia tunnel, but the fact that vp was not even mentioned in the list is ??? ? ? ? ?? ?
ok i see he was mentioned in 533 and uuuuuuuuugh iv why can't you just be town instead of spending so much time explaining why you won't be town
Are you open to a suggestion on your play VP?In post 855, VP Baltar wrote:Coming back to this...there are several people not mentioned in IV's list (me, andres, Outworld, SS, etc).In post 684, Datisi wrote:the fact that i think iv is much less paranoid of vp so he stops me from spiraling into a paranoia tunnel, but the fact that vp was not even mentioned in the list is ??? ? ? ? ?? ?
ok i see he was mentioned in 533 and uuuuuuuuugh iv why can't you just be town instead of spending so much time explaining why you won't be town
Why did you single me out?
Are you saying you want to tell me how to play mafia???????In post 856, Frogsterking wrote:Are you open to a suggestion on your play VP?
In post 856, Frogsterking wrote:Are you open to a suggestion on your play VP?In post 855, VP Baltar wrote:Coming back to this...there are several people not mentioned in IV's list (me, andres, Outworld, SS, etc).In post 684, Datisi wrote:the fact that i think iv is much less paranoid of vp so he stops me from spiraling into a paranoia tunnel, but the fact that vp was not even mentioned in the list is ??? ? ? ? ?? ?
ok i see he was mentioned in 533 and uuuuuuuuugh iv why can't you just be town instead of spending so much time explaining why you won't be town
Why did you single me out?
In post 857, VP Baltar wrote:Are you saying you want to tell me how to play mafia???????In post 856, Frogsterking wrote:Are you open to a suggestion on your play VP?
Great. Here:In post 858, VP Baltar wrote:lol sure, sign me up
Maybe it's right for you to be angry, because you were treated unfairly, and Datisi is not the person who is responsible?In post 855, VP Baltar wrote:Coming back to this...there are several people not mentioned in IV's list (me, andres, Outworld, SS, etc).In post 684, Datisi wrote:the fact that i think iv is much less paranoid of vp so he stops me from spiraling into a paranoia tunnel, but the fact that vp was not even mentioned in the list is ??? ? ? ? ?? ?
ok i see he was mentioned in 533 and uuuuuuuuugh iv why can't you just be town instead of spending so much time explaining why you won't be town
Why did you single me out?
I'm not mad? I think I understand what you're trying to imply, and we can talk about that if you want.In post 860, Frogsterking wrote:Maybe it's right for you to be angry, because you were treated unfairly, and Datisi is not the person who is responsible?
I believe I've said it already but my impression of RTP scum game is that their likely to try and actively wrangle the gamestate to be favorable towards scum. I think their significantly more passive this game than they would be if they were scum.In post 841, VP Baltar wrote:What makes you say this? I'd like to be convinced of that so I can stop wasting my time trying to figure them out.In post 675, OutWorldER wrote:For right now I trust RTP because I'm fairly sure this is their town game
What would they be doing if they were scum?In post 862, OutWorldER wrote:I believe I've said it already but my impression of RTP scum game is that their likely to try and actively wrangle the gamestate to be favorable towards scum. I think their significantly more passive this game than they would be if they were scum.
fwiw i actually think the oppositeIn post 810, Datisi wrote:to an outside observer, my towngame seems more effort-y than my scumgame - but i definitely work harder as scum, so. just a lot of that work is behind the scenes. not sure why you ask, tho.In post 806, Frogsterking wrote:IDK, do you work harder as scum than as town?
why rtp?In post 840, Frogsterking wrote:FYI i have come to the conclusion that both RTP and VP are town.
no, he's saying that if rtp is scum, they wouldn't be passive. they're passive, ergo probably not scumIn post 866, Aristeia wrote:Isn't the first sentence and the second sentence a contradiction? How does RTP wrangle the game state towards being scum-favorable if they are passive?
