Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 8:35 pm
Also why dont you like vp?In post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
Also why dont you like vp?In post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
when you and monkey are both mafia this comment makes sense .In post 539, Nordom wrote:I'm not reading Monkey as scum. He's been pretty abrasive and loose, but I don't think get a maf vibe from.
In post 26, Save The Dragons wrote:First
In post 370, Save The Dragons wrote:Town
Frogsterking
Nero Cain
DeasVail
fua
fireisredsir
VP Baltar
Yeet
Null
Scorpious
MalcolmTucker
Datisi
skitter30
Eyes without a face
Aristeia
Cape90
Nordom
GeneralWu
Scum
tenebrousluminary
humaneatingmonkey
VOTE: tenebro
In post 402, Save The Dragons wrote:my list isn't ordered my badIn post 391, Nero Cain wrote:STD has Wu as the 3rd scummist
In post 418, Save The Dragons wrote:hahaIn post 405, tenebrousluminary wrote:Would you like to explain any of your opinions, Sir Knight?In post 402, Save The Dragons wrote:my list isn't ordered my badIn post 391, Nero Cain wrote:STD has Wu as the 3rd scummist
In post 442, Save The Dragons wrote:i want pressure on you mostly, it's a gut read and i want to see how you respondIn post 434, tenebrousluminary wrote:Could you at least explain why you want to extinguish my beautiful light, Sir Knight?
It is difficult to assess the motivations of votes against me, as Mx. Oboro says I must, if no motivation is provided.
Someone towncase Save The Dragons as well. This is the entirety of their content so far.
I'm not one to discount a player to give preliminary reads on a re-read, but his reads were just too safe. There's nothing aggressive about them, other than projecting him as a "well-meaning" town player.In post 850, skitter30 wrote:Also why dont you like vp?In post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
Wrong game >.>In post 775, the worst wrote:A trick containing a trump is won by the hand playing the highest trump. A trick not containing a trump is won by the hand playing the highest card of the suit led. The winner of each trick leads next.
Couldn't the latter part of your argument apply to pretty much anyone there? If Wu isn't worthy of suspicion because the game remains in its early stages, why is anyone else? After all, unless someone is having a terrible game it's largely all gut-reads at this point. It's not as if Wu was piled on initially either, there was some lingering suspicion sparked about 10/11 pages into the game, all of which seemed based on pretty solid reasoning for me. This feels like quite a weak defence which conveniently ignores the points that were actually being made against Wu.In post 493, Nordom wrote:Alright, this wagon on Wu feels pretty weak. You can argue that "Well, they haven't really scumhunted, they've lurked, and yadda yadda yadda", but I mean it hasn't even been 24 hours since this game skyrocketed into an absurd twenty pages.Not to mention, I'm getting some opportunistic vibes going on with these votes.
VOTE: Daitisi
Content to just push on players who are getting attention thrown their way and I haven't really gotten the impression that it's a town tell of "Pressuring for information" from them.
Yes sorry i was trying to disengage too >.>In post 852, Nordom wrote:VPBaltar (the guy who I'm scumreading) made an effort to give reads on a wider scope of players after a read of the game.
Whatever. I don't want to get into this exhausting debate with you, skitter, about this shit. I'm officially letting it go.
Mhmmm.In post 856, skitter30 wrote:Yes sorry i was trying to disengage too >.>In post 852, Nordom wrote:VPBaltar (the guy who I'm scumreading) made an effort to give reads on a wider scope of players after a read of the game.
Whatever. I don't want to get into this exhausting debate with you, skitter, about this shit. I'm officially letting it go.
And ig for vob i did like his fua sr and i kinda liked that i agreed with a lot of his reads >.>
This felt like a bit of an odd post, like Yeet's a little bit desperate to get on Datisi. It comes just a couple of posts after they were arguing Datisi was the most unpopular player in the game so far, so from that POV it's not as if there hasn't been a lot of pressure on them so far. What's with the absolute desperation here? I don't think there's any need to form a definitive wagon this early in the game, multiple players being suspected can be good for making/ruling out connections between players instead of putting all of our focus onto one individual player at the expense of others.In post 715, Yeet wrote:I think we should mount the pressure on Datisi sooner rather than later.
Let’s get some wagons going, guys. I don’t want to stall around all day and move last minute and scramble when we can just go sheep sheep sheep.
If i can ask, why are you ending up with a townread of me? The impression that i got during our convo is that you were scumreading meIn post 858, Nordom wrote:By the way, I town-read Skitter.
Why would you get the impression that I scum-read?In post 860, skitter30 wrote:If i can ask, why are you ending up with a townread of me? The impression that i got during our convo is that you were scumreading meIn post 858, Nordom wrote:By the way, I town-read Skitter.
Also what did you mean abt the drink?
Only just saw thisIn post 415, fireisredsir wrote:no, im relaxed yet sassy, didn't you hear
I kind of feel like you've done the same with the pressure of DatisiIn post 727, Nordom wrote:Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?
I disliked eyes' first posts, but I kind of lost the passion after posts like 586 - "I don't care about what reads he has here". - Seems strange from scum.In post 830, skitter30 wrote:I'm actually not liking his content through here, ehy'd you remove the vote?
This actually makes a lot of senseIn post 842, Cape90 wrote:But I thought when I joined somehow the thread was still at page 1. I was like "why has nobody posted for an hour?"
I'm not so sure about that. I think I may have been the first one to vote Datisi.In post 865, DeasVail wrote:I kind of feel like you've done the same with the pressure of DatisiIn post 727, Nordom wrote:Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?
I don't believe that you think thisIn post 868, Nordom wrote:I'm not so sure about that. I think I may have been the first one to vote Datisi.In post 865, DeasVail wrote:I kind of feel like you've done the same with the pressure of DatisiIn post 727, Nordom wrote:Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?
To follow up on this - for what it's worth I'd mostly been TR'ing Yeet until now and felt like their approach would've been quite strange and really bold from mafia. But that post just caught me as incredibly weird when going through, how can you simultaneously be frustrated there's not enough of a bandwagon on someone while insisting they've been the most mafia-read player so far? Yeet may still come out as town and that wouldn't surprise me but I dunno, just a really odd post to make.In post 861, fua wrote:I TR Skitter, but I’m pretty sure some of her townreads and all of her scumreads are wildly wrong (less sure on Eyes, but still).
Malcolm is a strong TR and that’s a good catch from him.
Mhmmm. Well, I'll just say on my behalf that I was too lazy to check for myself. Didn't feel like trudging through those 20 pages again.In post 871, DeasVail wrote:I'm surprised that you didn't check to see if you were correct or not
Any scumreads?In post 872, MalcolmTucker wrote:To follow up on this - for what it's worth I'd mostly been TR'ing Yeet until now and felt like their approach would've been quite strange and really bold from mafia. But that post just caught me as incredibly weird when going through, how can you simultaneously be frustrated there's not enough of a bandwagon on someone while insisting they've been the most mafia-read player so far? Yeet may still come out as town and that wouldn't surprise me but I dunno, just a really odd post to make.In post 861, fua wrote:I TR Skitter, but I’m pretty sure some of her townreads and all of her scumreads are wildly wrong (less sure on Eyes, but still).
Malcolm is a strong TR and that’s a good catch from him.