Mafiascum.net

Also even if Math is scum they shouldn't be lynched, they should get vigged btw.
pedit: that's not meta Cloudie those are my ISOs this game.

In post 8547, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 8545, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8539, CloudKicker wrote:Looks like gin trying to release the pressure of my calling his concuring out, as if it was banal etc, this is all implicit

So in your books, if I agree with you because I hold a philosophy that lines up with what you're saying, it's scummy; so then if only people disagreed with you, that'd be townie?

It doesn't make any sense

Nope, i was saying about you using the very same word "concur" in your next 2-3 posts after i said not to buddy me. It felt like you wanted to discredit my reads on you as if you saying that was normal, banal and ultimately non-ai

It's called being a smart ass because you said I was buddying you when I agreed with something you said.

@Nero, if Math needs to be shot, let them get shot >_>

If the PR works only by being shot, you literally negate the PR by lynching them

In post 8550, Alisae wrote:Also even if Math is scum they shouldn't be lynched, they should get vigged btw.
pedit: that's not meta Cloudie those are my ISOs this game.

i assumed 2 games because 2 links oupsy

In post 8544, CloudKicker wrote:are you saying you actually townread math? as if you wanted to let him not-nkd

no I am scum reading Math. I'm saying that I'm town and on the off chance that Math is town then scum wouldn't nk it so that I continue pushing that slot and if I ever get flipped ppl would know my reads are genuine and might go after Math.

But II still think Math is scum. Nancy's rhetoric about how bad my push is prob means scumbuddies.

In post 8551, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8547, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 8545, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8539, CloudKicker wrote:Looks like gin trying to release the pressure of my calling his concuring out, as if it was banal etc, this is all implicit

So in your books, if I agree with you because I hold a philosophy that lines up with what you're saying, it's scummy; so then if only people disagreed with you, that'd be townie?

It doesn't make any sense

Nope, i was saying about you using the very same word "concur" in your next 2-3 posts after i said not to buddy me. It felt like you wanted to discredit my reads on you as if you saying that was normal, banal and ultimately non-ai

It's called being a smart ass because you said I was buddying you when I agreed with something you said.

Yea i know, also a manipulative way to discredit me. being a smart ass is implying you are above someone or something

In post 8552, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:@Nero, if Math needs to be shot, let them get shot >_>

If the PR works only by being shot, you literally negate the PR by lynching them

............................................

are you for real? Like is everyone here but me dumb?

In post 8554, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 8544, CloudKicker wrote:are you saying you actually townread math? as if you wanted to let him not-nkd

no I am scum reading Math. I'm saying that I'm town and on the off chance that Math is town then scum wouldn't nk it so that I continue pushing that slot and if I ever get flipped ppl would know my reads are genuine and might go after Math.

But II still think Math is scum. Nancy's rhetoric about how bad my push is prob means scumbuddies.

Do you have any way to read people off tone ? you called me town yet i think nancy outed better content than i did since i replaced-in. Math i havent read onto yet

In post 8555, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 8551, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8547, CloudKicker wrote:

In post 8545, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8539, CloudKicker wrote:Looks like gin trying to release the pressure of my calling his concuring out, as if it was banal etc, this is all implicit

So in your books, if I agree with you because I hold a philosophy that lines up with what you're saying, it's scummy; so then if only people disagreed with you, that'd be townie?

It doesn't make any sense

Nope, i was saying about you using the very same word "concur" in your next 2-3 posts after i said not to buddy me. It felt like you wanted to discredit my reads on you as if you saying that was normal, banal and ultimately non-ai

It's called being a smart ass because you said I was buddying you when I agreed with something you said.

Yea i know, also a manipulative way to discredit me. being a smart ass is implying you are above someone or something

Your read on me stems from me saying "I concur" starting off with that, something pinged. What got you so riled up?

In post 8556, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 8552, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:@Nero, if Math needs to be shot, let them get shot >_>

If the PR works only by being shot, you literally negate the PR by lynching them

............................................

are you for real? Like is everyone here but me dumb?

Who's the one saying someone's a PR that requires they need to be shot and then says they need rope?

From your perspective it doesn't make sense for you to want to lynch them, it would make sense for you to want them vigged.

Your read on you stems from having thousands of hours in playtime analysing how people talks and try to discredit other peoples in chat mefias, youre acting as if it was a serious read when im just being transparent with my reads youre the one being riled up mr gin

In post 8560, CloudKicker wrote:Your read on you stems from having thousands of hours in playtime analysing how people talks and try to discredit other peoples in chat mefias, youre acting as if it was a serious read when im just being transparent with my reads youre the one being riled up mr gin

my read*

In post 8550, Alisae wrote:Also even if Math is scum they shouldn't be lynched, they should get vigged btw.

I mean if they are scum Stonehenge they aren't going to use the investigation power. So it doesn't really matter. Traditionally speaking you lynch scum 9/10 times b/c you don't always have a vig. Like if we DO get another vig then Math would still be a quality shot and even if Math is scum there are still 4 other scum to lynch but my main point is that Math should die and I don't care how.

In post 8557, CloudKicker wrote:Do you have any way to read people off tone

I DO!

In post 8559, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:Who's the one saying someone's a PR that requires they need to be shot and then says they need rope?

From your perspective it doesn't make sense for you to want to lynch them, it would make sense for you to want them vigged.

reading skillz 1/10.

I'm saying they had a PR that requires they be shot and them wanting to be shot makes them scum. Pray tell how we'd vig Math without a vig? (b/c scum likely got the vig b/c why wouldn't they shoot Math last night?)

In post 8560, CloudKicker wrote:Your read on you stems from having thousands of hours in playtime analysing how people talks and try to discredit other peoples in chat mefias, youre acting as if it was a serious read when im just being transparent with my reads youre the one being riled up mr gin

If you're being transparent you're being serious, do those two not co-exist or are they somehow mutually exclusive?

In post 8563, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 8559, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:Who's the one saying someone's a PR that requires they need to be shot and then says they need rope?

From your perspective it doesn't make sense for you to want to lynch them, it would make sense for you to want them vigged.

reading skillz 1/10.

I'm saying they had a PR that requires they be shot and them

NOT

wanting to be shot makes them scum. Pray tell how we'd vig Math without a vig? (b/c scum likely got the vig b/c why wouldn't they shoot Math last night?)

I'll have you know I passed 3rd grade reading with a solid C, thank you very much.


Okay...so scum picked a role that painted a giant ass "X marks the spot" for what reason?

Epicmefia dot com

In post 8564, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:

In post 8560, CloudKicker wrote:Your read on you stems from having thousands of hours in playtime analysing how people talks and try to discredit other peoples in chat mefias, youre acting as if it was a serious read when im just being transparent with my reads youre the one being riled up mr gin

If you're being transparent you're being serious, do those two not co-exist or are they somehow mutually exclusive?

Spoiler:

Where'd you play to get over 1000 hours holy shit

My read is serious, doesnt mean im its mefia ai per se

Gin aren't you supposed to be doing catch-up?

and this still applies

In post 8562, Nero Cain wrote:I mean if they are scum Stonehenge they aren't going to use the investigation power.

so I mean. Like I'm ok with waiting around to vig them in case they are town (wich is why I'm not voting them) but I mean I'm not willing to let it coast.

I'm doing it in my spare time and when there is no activity in the thread.

Is there a reason you don't want me talking right now?

In post 8565, TheRealGin-N-Tonic wrote:Okay...so scum picked a role that painted a giant ass "X marks the spot" for what reason?

Keep the investiation out of towns hands.

Now why does town select a pr that requires they be vigged and not want to be vigged on that night we had a vig?

I don't mind the talking, don't get me wrong.
It just seems like you're doing the same exact thing you pushed ProHawk for in Spyro.

Is stonehenge a player or a wonder?

@8571, That really doesn't make sense. Also there was a Vig the same time Math said that and the Vig didn't shoot?

P-Edit: I faintly remember pushing Prohawk for not actively engaging with the game but I can look back.

join me on Sodom guys