Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2022 10:21 am
MINE
It wasn’t about that, I wanted your responses, a test on how your gonna respond to the question.In post 8432, Bellaphant wrote:... maybe this is the issue. This. Was. A. Joke. Two people forgot the masons, which you seemed to think was scummy. Why are you so angry at me?In post 8402, ProfessorDrapion wrote:TF is this accusation, start reading the fucking thread as I also TR Puppet.In post 8379, Bellaphant wrote:... professor drapion will be telling everyone you two are scum now.
The masons are Roden And dweelee.
Misrep.In post 8554, Off The Hook wrote: it's a really bad look that BBT is making a big deal of "Dunn was pushing BBT before he died" as a point and trying to deflect it ontoliterally anyone else
~GE
I honestly don't know atpIn post 8578, Off The Hook wrote:i think drapions town what do u think gamma? : DD
It's literally right here.
This is deeply wrong headed.In post 8584, Off The Hook wrote:I honestly don't know atpIn post 8578, Off The Hook wrote:i think drapions town what do u think gamma? : DD
there's like 3 or 4 players going out of their way to misrepresent either me or other people
That leaves me wanting to think anyone else who is not doing so is town
~GE
i think bluebloodedtoffee does have a point rn though..? dunnstral suspecting him was much further away than suspecting other people (such as us)In post 8584, Off The Hook wrote:there's like 3 or 4 players going out of their way to misrepresent either me or other people
Math can be scum.In post 8583, Bell wrote:How do you feel about Mathblade BBT.
Dude....In post 8572, Off The Hook wrote:I don't think town!Bell should have accepted a vetoIn post 8561, Lukewarm wrote:And to be clear Gamma.
I accept exactly Zero (0) vetoes from Nancy.
So, it really confuses me to see you say that Bell, if town, should be willing to accept More Then One (>1) Veto for nancy, or conversely, you see scum motivation behind being unwilling to accept multiple from her.
I'm saying scum!Bell only accepting the 1 veto serves a long-term purpose of limiting DP's ability to interfere. No more, no less. I'm getting really fucking tired of you assclowns misrepresenting my arguments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This wording implies, that not wanting "more than one veto" was the thing that you were questioning.In post 8518, Off The Hook wrote:btw my thought on this was:think there might be a reasonBell doesn't want toallow you more than one veto?
ik you think Bell is town but I feel like his play very well serves a possible scum agenda.
~GE
In post 8591, T-Bone wrote:Can you also do hydra dissonance in your PT and not here?
In post 8573, Rad wrote:
So when you and Dunn had this back and forth about soft outting his role to you, he said:
And I sat on that line for a while trying to come up with what the rest of the line was. Back when I used to play, we had a role called Veteran, so I pictured a vet sitting in his rocking chair and as the scum walk into his door, he shoots them saying something like "this may not be what you were looking for, but it's what you are going to get." BOOM.In post 4864, Dunnstral wrote:I am going to attempt to soft my role to Lukewarm. This should be fairly cryptic but not impossible to figure out.
"...but it's what you are going to get."
This fit fairly well for me with his other statement here:
Confirmable - yeah he's going to kill scum when they come try to NK him. Also I had the thought that it could be a vet with both a day kill and night kill option.In post 4898, Dunnstral wrote:Confirmable: yesIn post 4873, Bell wrote:Is it a role that is confirmable or extremely useful and you would not recommend killing in any capacity D1 Dunn.
Extremely useful: no
Would not recommend killing day 1: yes
Extremely Useful - depends on if scum comes to kill him, maybe he says No because scum probably won't try it.
Would not recommend killing day 1 - yes, let the scum try to come kill him
This post also felt like more confirmation, like he was trying to bait scum into roleblocking him (which in my understanding, the vet/pgo should fire first before the roleblock? no clue if that's actually how that would play out)In post 4913, Dunnstral wrote:I sure hope I don't get roleblockedIn post 4910, Lukewarm wrote:This shit better confirmIn post 4898, Dunnstral wrote:Confirmable: yes
UNVOTE:
All that said, I didn't even know a "friendly neighbor" role existed so it wasn't in the realm of role possibilities I was considering when I was trying to figure out what he was soft claiming.
Do you think it’s pleasant for me to deal with this? I feel like I have something on BBT but all Marci has said in response is “but he has a point” when his “point” is exceedingly dull!In post 8596, T-Bone wrote:That you start doing dissonance really really hard the moment your slot faces a little bit of pressure feels like an intentional strategy to deflect it.