Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:11 am
Vote: MoI
They call me Neptune.
↑ AurorusVox wrote:MoI, if you think this wagon is scum motivated, point out which of the people are the scum that are motivating it.
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:
I meant you did exactly as what MoI said: you've put me and Moi as your top 2 (though I don't remember why you think I'm scum), but are voting DCL, your third.
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:Oh look another mystery wagon that springs out of nowhere to save Iceguy from the noose ...
Color me not shocked ...
IceGuy wrote:↑ AurorusVox wrote:MoI, if you think this wagon is scum motivated, point out which of the people are the scum that are motivating it.
Also it's quite funny since he was one of the people trying to get more votes on me when the DCL wagon began disintegrating.
But I'm pretty sure he has a totally legit explanation why the exact same thing is proof of scumminess in other people and proof of towniness in him!
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:↑ IceGuy wrote:
He's taking normal town behavior (voting a player I'm willing to lynch who has a large wagon and a high possibility of getting lynched) and insinuating it makes me scum. This is not scumhunting in good faith, that's not even refined manipulation, this is a primitive attempt at trying to get my mislynch wagon through so his partner doesn't get lynched.
...Still not a scumclaim.
Whisper: Don't see it. Why should I lynch MoI?
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:Oh look another mystery wagon that springs out of nowhere to save Iceguy from the noose ...
Color me not shocked ...
↑ Amrun wrote:Made it to page 25, will have to finish up when I finally get home as I'm about to get back on a train.
Thoughts so far:
-IceGuy still scum. What's really funny is that he's saying MoI "ramps up" a person's scumminess, which is totally true, but is NOT a scumtell... It's actually a TOWNTELL for MoI. And it's doubly funny because IceGuy also does this, but I've never observed him doing it as town.
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:
That is quite the coincidence, though. Even ignoring DCL's wagon (since at the time it was considered to be another wagon on scum), should this kick off this would be the second time IceGuy's been saved. Incidentally, he's being saved by the same people who went to Arug yesterday: himself, robo, and AVox.
That's too similar to just be coincidence.
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:
well, uh, he did have you as another scum, so why is it bad that he's simply going to another wagon on scum?
P-EDIT: Ignored my question. Answer it.
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:Dammit, stupid palm.
Whisper, why did you include my vote on IceGuy and could you please explain what you're getting at here?
↑ MagnaofIllusion wrote:Oh look another mystery wagon that springs out of nowhere to save Iceguy from the noose ...
Color me not shocked ...
That is quite the coincidence, though. Even ignoring DCL's wagon (since at the time it was considered to be another wagon on scum), should this kick off this would be the second time IceGuy's been saved. Incidentally, he's being saved by the same people who went to Arug yesterday: himself, robo, and AVox.
That's too similar to just be coincidence.
↑ whispersilk wrote:
First, he insinuates I'm scummy for again changing my read on IG (nevermind the fact that it changed back to a scum read and he also thinks IG is scum), and in an even more subtle way, he's saying that I'm somehow trying to save DCL (who is a scum read of mine).
Then despite saying he wants to lynch IG more than DCL, and the case on IG is better, he really does not want to derail the DCL wagon.
Now Voided's vote on IG is terribad too. Voided ditches the case he's had on IG since day 1 (except he hasn't really had a case of his own, mainly sheeped other people) to vote DCL, who is also trying to push a IG lynch, but the way he does it is like he's trying to ditch the responsibility onto someone else.
MoI is acting scummier than IG has all game. His recent post combined with what I said about him yesterday is enough for me to vote him.
↑ whispersilk wrote:
@Amrun:If you could stick around for like 5 minutes to answer something: Why is IG scum?
↑ whispersilk wrote:↑ Amrun wrote:Made it to page 25, will have to finish up when I finally get home as I'm about to get back on a train.
Thoughts so far:
-IceGuy still scum. What's really funny is that he's saying MoI "ramps up" a person's scumminess, which is totally true, but is NOT a scumtell... It's actually a TOWNTELL for MoI. And it's doubly funny because IceGuy also does this, but I've never observed him doing it as town.
Really? Cuz in a game I played with him where he was scum and I was town, he hella ramped up my scumminess and spent all of the first two pages pushing a policy lynch on me by telling everyone I was the worst player around and was power-lurking scum. Except he can't pull that in this game cuz I'm obv town playing completely against my lurk-scum meta.Which thankfully Hoopla pointed out for everyone.
Point in case: yesterday, the EXACT SAME BEHAVIOR from MoI made him town by meta, according to you, but then you flip flop for no discernible reason other than pressure? Meta can't equal town AND scum. This meta flip flop from you is extremely scummy, especially without addressing it when you made the flip flop AND after it was pointed out.
I think you're stretching a lot too with MoI. The original point you had was valid, that he said the wagon was scum driven but then didn't show how it was and the reads don't match up, but it's not much by itself. How much you've tried to make out of it is silly. All other points are silly.
I have found him extremely scummy starting from yesterday; I dislike how he questioned Arugula's townread on me while NOT having a scumread on me. In general, most of his reads don't gel in this way. This is a hallmark of "looking for things to attack" rather than genuinely scumhunting, and undermining town reads like that is a favorite scumtell of mine.
Today, I have found him pretty hypocritical, as outlined above, and he is contradicting himself to make his argument look better in whatever time he's posting it in. I also don't like how he misconstrues attacks against him and strawmans them, like he did with yours. He countered by saying, "So changing reads is scummy?" when CLEARLY you were not saying that - you were saying that the context he changed them in and how he changed them made him scummy. Incorrectly boiling it down to "so changing reads is scummy" is super disingenuous.