Page 36 of 148

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:31 pm
by Ms Marangal
because questioning my voting patterns is scummy. I don't like scummy questions

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:31 pm
by Ms Marangal
that and I'm tired

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:37 pm
by GuyInFreezer
But your 861 implies that you wanted someone to ask you a question about your voting pattern. :V
Now that "somebody" asked you about that, are you gonna vote now?

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:40 pm
by Piratecat
Majiffy wrote:Stupid, but not really very scummy. Makes sense for someone who is suffering from a severe case of the bias.


where is the bias

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:42 pm
by Piratecat
Angelious Nero wrote:IMollie:Is Bork the same here as Posh?


he has done a fade

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:43 pm
by Piratecat
^ so kind of

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:43 pm
by Ms Marangal
GuyInFreezer wrote:But your 861 implies that you wanted someone to ask you a question about your voting pattern. :V
Now that "somebody" asked you about that, are you gonna vote now?

no, I didn't. I don't consciously think about what I want people to comment on, I just note shit. 861 is stating observations I have noticed over time, and no, I'm not going to vote yet.

Pedit: damimt mollie, stop posting!!!

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:44 pm
by Piratecat
Ms Marangal wrote:because questioning my voting patterns is scummy. I don't like scummy questions


erm...no

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:45 am
by Slandaar
CryoChemist wrote:If Messiah is town and this is a town v town thing, it's going to backfire hard....

There is no way; There is just absolutely no way this hadn't crossed their mind during the first challenge which they claim now to be trolling which I highly doubt.

Really they are now enlightened all this time later? 'Oh if we 1v1 someone and we are both town this is bad for town!' This is completely obvious anyone would know this straight away...

CryoChemist wrote:
You scared?

This reads so fake too.

They are posturing, they are posturing purposefully TO TRY TO LOOK TOWN this is obvious; they shouldn't need to do this as town; they are scum.

Their content post was quite good but its simply one post in a sea of scummyness; they are not town. The language they use and the sheer quantity of 'oh we are town we re sacrificial' without seeming to be the least bit frustrated is clearly scum.

also; they lied, they have played with me as town where I tunnelled; Its a bit stupid to do that as scum so its minor but it is manipulating evidence etc and its possible kthx didn't read Jals post earlier.

AngryPidgeon wrote:
@Slandaar: "Forgot you were even in the game." -Cryonudist. You really think this is a lie? It feels a bit bold to actually be a lie given that their reactions to you are what made everyone start looking tat them in the first place. Dangerous WIFOM, I know, but I really would bet they flip town right now.

You would think they would look at where their wagon came from at least. So, yes. (unless they don't actually care because they are caught scum and assumed as such) I don't really see how town would just be like 'oh theres loads of people calling me scum well this seems normal after I have posted nothing all game.'

------

Please lynch CryoNudist.

If I am somehow wrong lynch me tomorrow but there is no way I am.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:08 am
by CryoChemist
No eating hat statement? Clearly you're scum or you'd be willing to eat a hat if you were wrong.


^about the same validity as your reasoning for thinking we are scum.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:27 am
by Slandaar
Cryo's scumreads summed up;
CryoChemist wrote:Slandaar Vote is good, Angelious is better...

Vote:Angelious Nero


I mean seriously

Hes scum, its obvious. There is no way that is coincidence.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:38 am
by CryoChemist
Image

Oh, there you are Slandaar!

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:42 am
by The Goat
Slandaar wrote:Cryo's scumreads summed up;
CryoChemist wrote:Slandaar Vote is good, Angelious is better...

Vote:Angelious Nero


I mean seriously

Hes scum, its obvious. There is no way that is coincidence.


I don't know that post 17 was intended to be taken as a serious scumread that early in the game.

I didn't have a strong scumread on Cryo until page 34. I'm currently paying for forgetting how annoying red wine hangovers can be, but will try a Cryo post iso and analyze it later on today. You know, when my brain feels like it's properly anchored in my skull.

@Ms Marangal: Okay, *I'LL* ask, because I didn't really notice it until you posted it...why do you suddenly find me to be town?

@pirate mollie: You want to get up in my grill in a good way or a bad way? Because now I picture you as crazy AND gangsta.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:19 am
by Venmar
Votecount 1.9


[L-10]
Colonel Guile:
Bitmap

[L-10]
Messiah:
AngryPidgeon

[L-11] Slandaar:

[L-8]
CryoNudist:
Slandaar, qwints, mastin2

[L-10]
Angelious Nero:
CryoNudist

[L-10]
PirateCat:
havingfitz

[L-11] Borkjerfkin:

[L-10]
Majiffy:
Knight of Cydonia

:right:
[L-7]
AngryPidgeon:
Colonel Guile, Majiffy, Angelous Nero, borkjerfkin

[L-11] The Goat:

[L-11] Mac:

[L-9]
Approximately Normal Guy:
Messiah, GuyInFreezer

[L-11] Ms Marangal:

[L-11] Bitmap:

[L-11] Jal:

[L-10]
Knight of Cydonia:
PeregrineV

[L-10]
mastin2:
Jal

[L-11] PeregrineV:

[L-11] qwints:

[L-11] havingfitz:

[L-10]
GuyinFreezer:
Approximately Normal Guy


Not Voting

  • Ms Marangal, PirateCat, The Goat, Mac


Deadline

  • April 2, 2013


Mod Notes

  • Mastin2 is V/LA for a while
  • Bitmap is V/LA until the 25th ( Monday )
  • Havingfitz is V/LA until the 25th ( Monday )
  • qwints is also apparently V/LA
  • Jal is V/LA until the 24th ( Sunday ) ( Ends Today )
  • PeregrineV is V/LA until the 25th ( Monday )
  • Approximately Normal Guy has been prodded

  • Messiah will be replaced soon for not responding to her prod in-thread. I'll start looking for a replacement if she doesn't return in the next few hours.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:22 am
by Slandaar
CryoChemist wrote:Image

Oh, there you are Slandaar!

Image
I wondered who dropped this down to me!

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:27 am
by Messiah
Hey, I've spent about half the time since my last post in a hospital bed. I'll try to catch up soonish.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:30 am
by Knight of Cydonia
Ms Marangal wrote:because questioning my voting patterns is scummy. I don't like scummy questions

...whut

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:26 am
by qwints
Ms Marangal wrote:because questioning my voting patterns is scummy. I don't like scummy questions


Why would you say something like this?

I'm very happy with my Cyro vote.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:36 am
by GuyInFreezer
'Cause she's scum and she's not pleased with me catching her not voting.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:53 am
by GuyInFreezer
Also,
VOTE: Ms.M.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 9:25 am
by Majiffy
Piratecat wrote:where is the bias

Suggesting a 1v1 against their scum read on day 1. You really can't get any more conf-biased than that.

Also lol @ Slandaar calling CN scummy for suggesting a 1v1, then
Slandaar wrote:Please lynch CryoNudist.

If I am somehow wrong lynch me tomorrow but there is no way I am.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 10:37 am
by Jal
Right. I'm sorta off V/LA now. Catching up.

While I do so, Ap you're going to have to tell me how I keep you sane when I left off with a Mastin vote vastly disagreed with.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:33 am
by Slandaar
Majiffy wrote:
Also lol @ Slandaar calling CN scummy for suggesting a 1v1, then
Slandaar wrote:Please lynch CryoNudist.

If I am somehow wrong lynch me tomorrow but there is no way I am.

You seem to be missing a quote. Please fetch it.

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:41 am
by Majiffy
Slandaar wrote:By agreeing to [1v1] Cryo wants people to think exactly what he just said ie 'What does it gain scum-us to be in a 1v1 situation when we are on multiple people's scum lists yet have (had) 1 total vote?'.

You mean like this?

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:45 am
by Majiffy
And to give you an idea of your "case" on Cryo up to the point where you suggested the 1v1:
Slandaar wrote:[He says he's played with me before, he hasn't]

Proven wrong
Slandaar wrote:[Awkward phrasing]

Not a scum tell
Slandaar wrote:[WIFOM]

Because WIFOM arguments are winning arguments!
Slandaar wrote:[unflipped player is bussing Cryo]

Because unflipped associative tells always work!
Slandaar wrote:Please lynch CryoNudist.

If I am somehow wrong lynch me tomorrow but there is no way I am.

And a 1v1.

So about that scum role PM you got there, Slandaar...