Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:26 am
Also the meta read isn't the point, but I can't make the point I wanted to make because ongoing game.
Page 36 of 135
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:26 am
You did it again.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:27 am
I tend to be impulsive and unclear sometimes, but my point is always the same.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:27 am
How could I say I wasn't meta reading you without saying that...
Anyway this is all very off topic. I have some questions about your wiki entry but I'll PM you.
Anyway this is all very off topic. I have some questions about your wiki entry but I'll PM you.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:29 am
If it's not about the game, go for it.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:48 am
When you put it that way it does sound bad, but this post made me reconsider.In post 868, Drone wrote:Why on earth would a VT ROLEFISH!? You guys kidding!?
In post 840, ChaosOmega wrote:Yeah, I was in the first game with HS. I was scum and thought they were doctor with how they were looking for PRs. I get role-fishing is bad and makes you look scummy, but I don't think it's a scumtell in this case.
This is just absurd.In post 871, Drone wrote:And Toto is HS's scumbuddy.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:56 am
unfortunately it does matter even if there dead your not allowed to talk about it. i did something like what you just did earlier this year and was force replaced out so... its likely your gonna be as well cause of it. sorry.In post 875, MortFeld wrote:Also the meta read isn't the point, but I can't make the point I wanted to make because ongoing game.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:59 am
Associations if we flip the slot?
TF scum? I'm 50/50
Chaos scum
LUV town
Drone town
Creeps town
Not sure. Actually I see this as very unlikely. How do you even make associations here when the case on HS is legitimate?
Pedit: Oh. I uh, don't plan on talking about ongoing games anymore if that affects the decision to force replace me. I do think another replace would pretty much completely kill this game though, especially if TF is being force replaced too.
HS scum
TF scum? I'm 50/50
Chaos scum
LUV town
Drone town
Creeps town
HS town
Not sure. Actually I see this as very unlikely. How do you even make associations here when the case on HS is legitimate?
Pedit: Oh. I uh, don't plan on talking about ongoing games anymore if that affects the decision to force replace me. I do think another replace would pretty much completely kill this game though, especially if TF is being force replaced too.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:00 am
VOTE: HS
Going to go with my mind over my gut here.
Going to go with my mind over my gut here.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:01 am
I'm not being force replaced.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:04 am
Ok that's good.
Forgot HS scum -> Road scum. This is the one I'm probably most sure of. Annoyed at myself for not questioning this.
Road can you explain 848 please?
Forgot HS scum -> Road scum. This is the one I'm probably most sure of. Annoyed at myself for not questioning this.
Road can you explain 848 please?
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:04 am
I don't think you'll be force replaced either. Hope not anyway.
I still don't know why we're letting wobbuffet off the hook. I've caught him in 2 lies already.
I still don't know why we're letting wobbuffet off the hook. I've caught him in 2 lies already.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:05 am
Well technically 3 but who's counting
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:16 am
I'm not letting him off the hook. He's tied for my second scum read pre-HS flip.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:44 am
For your information, Mort an HS flip would give us first of all the night phase where we gather information from the nk.
If HS is town, I'm retracting my attack on toto.
It's some analysis I've done that would either paint toto in a brighter light, or a darker if HS flips scum.
Mort is town and I'm becoming more and more certain of it,
Naomi is null.
If HS is town, I'm retracting my attack on toto.
It's some analysis I've done that would either paint toto in a brighter light, or a darker if HS flips scum.
Mort is town and I'm becoming more and more certain of it,
Naomi is null.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:26 pm
Understandable. I'm the same way in the sense I play better in the moment and really don't like to reread, but I have learned it's a must if you want to do well so I can sympathize. Though I would feel more comfortable if you at least showed signs that you attempted to understand what happened before subbing in.In post 846, Road Kamelot wrote:I havent reread yet i was saying that i dont usually get good reads from rereading i need to talk to people not read after the factIn post 838, Lil Uzi Vert wrote: @Kamelot:Why did you vote for Creeps after admitting that you haven't really read the thread? Why did you feel your reads were crap after attempting to reread?
I voted for creeps bc i wanted to test what Mort said
was disappointed
Reaction tests are stupid in my opinion.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:26 pm
Which pushes in particular? I personally wasn't a fan of the Misa or TF pushes. If it's this one going on currently, I don't really see how you can be so sure HS is town.In post 855, Road Kamelot wrote:Kay ty
Reading when i get the chance. Dont like the pushes ive seen so far but we'll see
I could be wrong on Twoface but im really sure HS is town and that claim post should be all the evidence needed
Unvote and push something else
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:27 pm
Why did you vote for TB here? He hasn't made his catch-up post yet.In post 856, MortFeld wrote:I agree with that, for now.
UNVOTE: HS
Wondering whether it's better to get a wagon on TB so he decides to pretend to play this game, or if I'd rather vote Wobbu. Misa/Road slot looking slightly better except for the aversion to reading.
VOTE: TB
I still don't understand your Creeps reaction test. Like what types of reaction from me would have been alignment indicative? Asking more because it's my second game and the concept of reaction tests is something I don't really understand yet.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 12:37 pm
Because he hasn't made the post yet. Nobody can prove he's game avoiding or not but I want incentive for him to make it just the same. I also SR him independently of his lack of recent contribution. I feel like the questionable decision there was unvoting HS, not voting TB.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 7:41 pm
Which are...?In post 886, TwoFace wrote:I don't think you'll be force replaced either. Hope not anyway.
I still don't know why we're letting wobbuffet off the hook. I've caught him in 2 lies already.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:16 pm
I'm sure he knows he needs to make it before taking any action or jumping back into the fray. Voting him there just read so out of place to me.In post 893, MortFeld wrote:Because he hasn't made the post yet. Nobody can prove he's game avoiding or not but I want incentive for him to make it just the same. I also SR him independently of his lack of recent contribution. I feel like the questionable decision there was unvoting HS, not voting TB.
I didn't question your unvoting of HS there because you voted him again rather quickly again based on gut.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:17 pm
EBWOPIn post 895, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm sure he knows he needs to make it before taking any action or jumping back into the fray. Voting him there just read so out of place to me.In post 893, MortFeld wrote:Because he hasn't made the post yet. Nobody can prove he's game avoiding or not but I want incentive for him to make it just the same. I also SR him independently of his lack of recent contribution. I feel like the questionable decision there was unvoting HS, not voting TB.
I didn't question your unvoting of HS there because you voted him again rather quickly based on gut.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:17 pm
EBWOPIn post 895, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I'm sure he knows he needs to make it before taking any action or jumping back into the fray. Voting him there just read so out of place to me.In post 893, MortFeld wrote:Because he hasn't made the post yet. Nobody can prove he's game avoiding or not but I want incentive for him to make it just the same. I also SR him independently of his lack of recent contribution. I feel like the questionable decision there was unvoting HS, not voting TB.
I didn't question your unvoting of HS there because you voted him again rather quickly based on gut.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:41 pm
.
Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:41 pm
.