Page 36 of 170
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:45 am
by Vifam
His tone and questioning feels like they're coming from town, his attack on Comm when he first started seemed really town motivated even though I dont disagree with it, he's a pretty solid townread atm
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:47 am
by Nero Cain
In post 873, Land of Xanth wrote:Ay Jesus.
When you're done catching up let's have some fun, shall we?
ISO your predecessor and tell me what your read on them.
I can already tell you that its a town slot so whatever you were scum reading them for is wrong.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:51 am
by Vifam
Who did you replace Nero
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:53 am
by Nero Cain
So why was he in your murky middle if you thought that?
Narna I think
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:54 am
by SlySly
In post 874, Nero Cain wrote: In post 872, SlySly wrote:
It's D1. There's no flips, no true associations, no results, and no VCA to work with. Which slot isn't null at this point?
that was fast. But you had scumreads on SSBM and Tywin so I'm not understanding why you voted a cop claim over your two scum reads?
At first my vote on James was principle. As time went on, there was talk of James having the meta of fake claiming right out of the gate and adjusting his claim as the game progresses. I'm good with my vote. I'd support a Tywin or SSBM lynch as well.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:56 am
by Vifam
Why do you think SSbm is scum sly
I could see Tywain
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:56 am
by Nero Cain
I obviously not done but did he change his claim or something?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:59 am
by Vifam
In post 779, Tywin Lannister wrote: In post 777, Land of Xanth wrote: In post 762, Tywin Lannister wrote:VOTE: Skalda.
The fact that this guy hasn't been voted at all by anyone makes me believe he's scum.
That's NAI. Other people's actions are not indicative of a different person's alignment.
Not that I'm against a Skelda lynch, but that's just bs shade throwing.
That's more reason to vote someone than "nobody voted this dude hurr de hurr"
You and vifam's reaction to my single vote on Skald is very interesting. I wonder why you both reacted so strongly to a single vote? Do you TR Skald, and if so, why? What makes you so upset about a single vote on a very inactive player?
I think he's town but it's your reasoning behind the vote that I really have a problem with, I don't see how anything you mapped out is scummy on Skelda's part and it feels pretty weak tbh
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:59 am
by SlySly
I'm probably due for a re-read. I've been sick. I'm playing in 2 other games and way behind at work. But, here's what I served up when I was freshly caught up. I know a lot this was a while back.
In post 225, SlySly wrote:Kyouko - 1 shot cop claim seemed legit to me. multiple one shots would make sense in large. backtrack seemed scummy to me
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:14 am
by SlySly
Not yet in this game, but someone familiar with him from TOS mentioned that's his style. I'm not instantly recalling who though. I'll see if I can dig it up.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:22 am
by SlySly
Here ya go...
In post 363, Ramcius wrote:so i know his meta, and yes, he always claim at start of game, and after change claim like 2 times same day (or D2, if D1 is short), also, i call bs him telling he always fakeclaim scum, when he's scum, in that 1 game we had, he claimed VT and said massclaim is good idea, later claimed vig, when got heat (and that was final nail in his SK coffin for D2 lynch, since he failed prove vig N1), anyway, TL;DR James3 claims is NAI, he can claim real role, he can claim anything too, and it's no surprise for him to change his claim several times
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:26 am
by Land of Xanth
In post 885, SlySly wrote:Here ya go...
In post 363, Ramcius wrote:so i know his meta, and yes, he always claim at start of game, and after change claim like 2 times same day (or D2, if D1 is short), also, i call bs him telling he always fakeclaim scum, when he's scum, in that 1 game we had, he claimed VT and said massclaim is good idea, later claimed vig, when got heat (and that was final nail in his SK coffin for D2 lynch, since he failed prove vig N1), anyway, TL;DR James3 claims is NAI, he can claim real role, he can claim anything too, and it's no surprise for him to change his claim several times
Ya think it might be a possibility that Ram is trying to plant doubt within the town?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:03 am
by Ramcius
In post 886, Land of Xanth wrote: In post 885, SlySly wrote:Here ya go...
In post 363, Ramcius wrote:so i know his meta, and yes, he always claim at start of game, and after change claim like 2 times same day (or D2, if D1 is short), also, i call bs him telling he always fakeclaim scum, when he's scum, in that 1 game we had, he claimed VT and said massclaim is good idea, later claimed vig, when got heat (and that was final nail in his SK coffin for D2 lynch, since he failed prove vig N1), anyway, TL;DR James3 claims is NAI, he can claim real role, he can claim anything too, and it's no surprise for him to change his claim several times
Ya think it might be a possibility that Ram is trying to plant doubt within the town?
Look at James play and think - does that need additional efforts from me to make doubts? Anyway, does Pep out of the target already? Cause i remember you attacked me so hard for jumping out Pep wagon, yet i see no efforts from you to push him
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:16 am
by SlySly
Ya know how meta, true or false, wins around these parts.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:17 am
by SlySly
Does anyone ever really double check?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:52 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
I checked because I was so affronted by his strategy but usually I just ignore secondhand meta and go with what I've seen myself.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:00 am
by SlySly
In post 890, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
I checked because I was so affronted by his strategy but usually I just ignore secondhand meta and go with what I've seen myself.
Yep, same. A few games here and there and lots of faces become familiar.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:03 pm
by James3
In post 866, TTTT wrote: In post 864, James3 wrote:I learned that SlySly, Comm, LoX, and Uzi are scum. I learned that ssbm and Ramcius are very probably town. I don't make "light" reads.
4 hard scum reads
2 hard town reads
but not really pushing anything?
you got a link to this other site you played on?
I've been pushing SlySly for a while.
http://www.blankmediagames.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=17
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:49 pm
by SlySly
Your tunneling of me is gonna take the luster off of your shining MS debut.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:28 pm
by TTTT
Looks more like defending yourself than pushing a desired lynch
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 7:54 pm
by James3
In post 894, TTTT wrote:
Looks more like defending yourself than pushing a desired lynch
Do you have any questions about why he should be lynched?
He made the case for me, it's only a question of whether the majority of the town wants to pursue victory or not.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:38 pm
by Ramcius
Guys, do you think LoX would be viable lynch for today?
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:00 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
not particularly ..... no
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:03 pm
by Ramcius
then please come with better lynch
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 10:08 pm
by SlySly
James. Re-read. Notice the undeniable change in his game since I came out swinging at him. The bravado is gone. Confident town would've been shooting me down. He's fake claiming scum.