Mafiascum.net

In post 870, DeasVail wrote:I'm not a great scum player by any means, but faking a trajectory and throwing in some weird things that "scum wouldn't do" isn't that hard.

im not saying i cant fake a trajectory, im saying the trajectory ive had here is hard to fake
Like, I'd probably insist Kokichi should be ignored, or I would come out with the claim from the beginning and push the same plan I'm pushing now instead of favoring lynching my group first

In post 868, DeasVail wrote:

In post 865, zMuffinMan wrote:if you had control of the swap, who would you swap (if anyone) DV?

I would swap Bu and Fitz and still lynch group 2 I think

this is one of the only options i'd actually be fine with. it's the option i suggested to wisdom if people really want him to use his swap

if he tries to use it selfishly and lynch outside of group 2, i think i'm still going to swap him afterward

or i might sleep on it and reconsider -- i suppose the other option is him doing his selfish swap, me swapping someone like hf and just lynching the group after it but that's not as good as just lynching group 2 i think

lets do this differently
dv, if you knew that me and kokichi are town, would you agree with my plan?

In post 774, Wisdom wrote:I dont care.

What made you start caring?

In post 876, zMuffinMan wrote:or i might sleep on it and reconsider -- i suppose the other option is him doing his selfish swap, me swapping someone like hf and just lynching the group after it but that's not as good as just lynching group 2 i think

if you are town this is the only thing you should be doing. Either fitz or Riku.

In post 878, DeasVail wrote:

In post 774, Wisdom wrote:I dont care.

What made you start caring?

i was angry at what i was reading when i made this
i want town to work with me here rather than being swayed to not townread me and kokichi

wisdom, i'm considering your advice like you're considering mine, fwiw!

thats a cool excuse for not doing the strictly protown thing

i suppose the best thing that's come out of tonight is knowing that dram is going to wake up tomorrow, read the thread, snap his keyboard in half and headbutt is screen

i find that amusing

In post 877, Wisdom wrote:lets do this differently
dv, if you knew that me and kokichi are town, would you agree with my plan?

I would still be hesitant about RMOJ being the person swapped out of 3, but I wouldn't be as hesitant.

In post 882, Wisdom wrote:thats a cool excuse for not doing the strictly protown thing

haha... ha...

i guess the other good thing that's come out of tonight is quotes like this

Muffin, I think Wisdom is more likely town than scum fwiw.

that's exactly the point

i'm not looking for a qualifier like "more likely"

wtf guys i said not to post 10 pages overnight

In post 887, zMuffinMan wrote:that's exactly the point

i'm not looking for a qualifier like "more likely"

how do you play mafia then? are there cops in every game you play?

its really lame how both muffin and wisdom are underselling their scumgames here but it doesn't mean that they are scum it just means they're lame

prep for inevitable quote wall

In post 889, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:

In post 887, zMuffinMan wrote:that's exactly the point

i'm not looking for a qualifier like "more likely"

how do you play mafia then? are there cops in every game you play?

no, but this is a silly question. an analogy would be when there are counter-claims on the table, i don't say "hey let's ignore that and lynch this other dude over here because maybe he's scum"

except thats a not a good analogy when you lose more townies with one plan and fewer with another

In post 892, zMuffinMan wrote:

In post 889, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:

In post 887, zMuffinMan wrote:that's exactly the point

i'm not looking for a qualifier like "more likely"

how do you play mafia then? are there cops in every game you play?

no, but this is a silly question. an analogy would be when there are counter-claims on the table, i don't say "hey let's ignore that and lynch this other dude over here because maybe he's scum"

when there are counter claims on the table it's 1 scum vs 1 town

today its 1/2 scum vs 4/3 town

??

that's not true, but i do not really care to argue with either of you about it anymore so i'll just nod sagely at the sound logic in your posts

what the fuck is wrong with you

normally muffinman's posts make me go 'ooooh' and 'aaaah' and my pants get a little wet

but over here his awful logic makes me want to get a lobotomy

i swear to god if that isnt alignment indicative then idk man

what do you mean? i'm obviously just biding my time so i can kill you tonight, duh