Mafiascum.net

VOTE: Wh4t

it says goon in his name so

In post 818, Wh4t wrote:

In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:W4at-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?

Because I like where my vote is currently, on you no less. And I'm dramatic in my pushing but I am more concerned with determining her alignment before changing my vote.

Its a bit of a moot point now since you aren't voting me anymore but your vote was doing shit all. I mean, if you scum read me fine. I'm pretty used to being scum read for absolutely ludicrous reasons but the problem is that I'm getting town read by a lot of the game, thus making my d1 lynch very unlikely. I understand reads can change and walking back a town read isn't a hard thing to do regardless of alignment but you weren't trying to convince that they were wrong or that you should be shepped. Why were you comfortable doing nothing?

Also gonna go with Gamma and agree that "but i wuz doing slayerz gambit!" could easily be a cop out for caught scum.

nero's town

In post 836, Wh4t wrote:Oh christ Vax is scum.

VOTE: Vaxkiller

I thought it wouldn't make sense with mastina as SvS as he keeps calling her claim fake but then he goes on about how chick is obv scum and was the best vig. Usually when someone calls a claim fake they are implying that player is scum - half sitting on the fence about mastina's alignment whilst egging her on to use a pro-scum ability does not prevent vax and mastina from being SvS. It's feasible distancing imo.

this also happened ages ago so I'm not really getting the delayed reaction. Scum panicking that there was a wagon on them and then hops on the biggest wagon?

So I'm sitting here doing a vote count and I suddenly want to vote IC b/c I feel like them being voteless with how active they are is really odd. Kinda feel the same about Gamma. Even Lady Angel, who is almost surely scum, is atleast being useless with thiers.

In post 860, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 843, Wh4t wrote:

In post 703, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 700, Wh4t wrote:Is it bad that I want to vote IC for his nonsensical walls?

Yes. And wt actual f is “nonsensical” about them? Is this even a serious thought?

I wonder if I voted you, would FA consider that a scummy omgus? Lol

Because seriously, you really do look like you’re trying to solve based on little to none content.

Just saw this. Hi. I think you're scummy.

These omgussy type of posts, really do you no favours. Do you seriously disagree with this? Nero also noticed it.

Where did Nero notice it

Vaxkiller (3):, jjh927, Nosferatu, Wh4t
Innocent Children (2): Ginngie, Rylai and Lina
Skygazer (2): Titus, Nero Cain
Mastina (2): Maid Cafe, Nicorobin
Wh4t (2): Mastina, Invisibility
Porkens (2): Whemestar, randomidget
Whemestar (1): KuroiXHF
Vecna (1): Lady Angel
Chickadee (0):
Invisibility (0):
Nicorobin (0):
jjh927 (0):
Rylai and Lina (0):
Maid Cafe (0):
Gamma Emerald (0):
Titus (0):
KuroiXHF (0):
Lady Angel (0):
Ginngie (0):
Nero Cain (0):
Nosferatu (0):
randomidget (0):

Not Voting:Innocent Children, Gamma Emerald, Porkens, Vecna, Vaxkiller, Skygazer, Chickadee


With 22 alive it's 12 to lynch.

The day will end in (expired on 2018-09-25 18:00:00).

I mean Stargazer might appreciate Wh4t's meatless posts but I do not.

VOTE: Wh4t
I should have done this a while ago
FYI Wh4t is my , and I’ll go with Maid Cafe for my .

Wh4t (4): Mastina, Invisibility, Ginngie, Gamma Emerald
Vaxkiller (3):, jjh927, Nosferatu, Wh4t
Skygazer (2): Titus, Nero Cain
Mastina (2): Maid Cafe, Nicorobin
Porkens (2): Whemestar, randomidget
Whemestar (1): KuroiXHF
Vecna (1): Lady Angel
Innocent Children (1): Rylai and Lina
Chickadee (0):
Invisibility (0):
Nicorobin (0):
jjh927 (0):
Rylai and Lina (0):
Maid Cafe (0):
Gamma Emerald (0):
Titus (0):
KuroiXHF (0):
Lady Angel (0):
Ginngie (0):
Nero Cain (0):
Nosferatu (0):
randomidget (0):

Not Voting:Innocent Children, Porkens, Vecna, Vaxkiller, Skygazer, Chickadee


With 22 alive it's 12 to lynch.

The day will end in (expired on 2018-09-25 18:00:00).

Btw we’re about a week in so we should start forming some real wagons

In post 873, Wh4t wrote:

In post 871, Innocent Children wrote:Please link or quote the post where he does this, kthanx.

He has the shortest ISO it's not hard to see what I mean.

I read it but it looks a bit too reachy to me, to justify your sudden scum epiphany on him. This is what I mean by omgussy. You vote Vax to shade Mastina who just happens to be sr you. You claim to be “lightly “ tr me based on my lack of resistance to Chick wagon, then immediately jump to sr me, based on what really? - m sussing you due to null content and scumreading people who had better posts than you? Your progression on me absolutely no sense now you seem to be backpedaling by claiming we’re misunderstanding each other. Outside of decent Chick post, reachy Vax/Mastina post, your other posts today really don’t make a hell of a lot of sense.

Slayer's Gambit
When a vanilla townie intentionally acts scummy in an attempt to find scum eager to jump on to a bandwagon early in the game. Named after Disciple Slayer, a player who used this gambit in Mini 533. (Link)

This Gambit was used before Disciple Slayer by the legendary Internet Stranger, in early mafia games.

There is controversy that Disciple Slayer's actions were not intentionally scummy, but were, in fact, bad play.

Just found this. So, the case on Wh4t is presumably based on him faking this? Correct?

mostly, yeah.

In post 877, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 818, Wh4t wrote:

In post 800, Nero Cain wrote:W4at-If Mastina is outted scum then why isn't your vote there?

Because I like where my vote is currently, on you no less. And I'm dramatic in my pushing but I am more concerned with determining her alignment before changing my vote.

Its a bit of a moot point now since you aren't voting me anymore but your vote was doing shit all. I mean, if you scum read me fine. I'm pretty used to being scum read for absolutely ludicrous reasons but the problem is that I'm getting town read by a lot of the game, thus making my d1 lynch very unlikely. I understand reads can change and walking back a town read isn't a hard thing to do regardless of alignment but you weren't trying to convince

ANYONE

that they were wrong or that you should be shepped. Why were you comfortable doing nothing?

Also gonna go with Gamma and agree that "but i wuz doing slayerz gambit!" could easily be a cop out for caught scum.

Oh I see now, yeah I don’t really buy it.

In post 879, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 836, Wh4t wrote:Oh christ Vax is scum.

VOTE: Vaxkiller

I thought it wouldn't make sense with mastina as SvS as he keeps calling her claim fake but then he goes on about how chick is obv scum and was the best vig. Usually when someone calls a claim fake they are implying that player is scum - half sitting on the fence about mastina's alignment whilst egging her on to use a pro-scum ability does not prevent vax and mastina from being SvS. It's feasible distancing imo.

this also happened ages ago so I'm not really getting the delayed reaction. Scum panicking that there was a wagon on them and then hops on the biggest wagon?

Yeah, his post would have been more credible closer to the time Vax made the posts in question.

In post 856, Chickadee wrote:I just got home, there's 9 new pages.

I just got home and you're still doing nothing.

In post 858, Innocent Children wrote:plus the lack of resistance to her wagon

this isn't really true though b/c her wagon capped at what like 4 or 5 votes? I'd argue that the lack of a big wagon on her resistance to her wagon. There haven't really been any big wagons this game.

In post 880, Nero Cain wrote:So I'm sitting here doing a vote count and I suddenly want to vote IC b/c I feel like them being voteless with how active they are is really odd. Kinda feel the same about Gamma. Even Lady Angel, who is almost surely scum, is atleast being useless with thiers.

That’s true totally typical for me, though but I think I’m fine with Wh4t wagon, he just seems to be throwing around scumreads and seeing what sticks.

In post 746, mastina wrote:Gamma Emerald is actually a much, much easier to read player than people give him credit for. This one's a bit hard for me to explain, but all the promising signs are there. I loved his entrance into the game, and the insights he's been giving have been...well. Insightful, meaningful, and felt gamesolvy, while at the same time having his trademark level of laziness, for lack of a better word. It's casual, effortless, and natural, rather than stilted and artificial.

i think gamma is scum

i dont like his coloring stuff

In post 881, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 860, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 843, Wh4t wrote:

In post 703, Innocent Children wrote:

In post 700, Wh4t wrote:Is it bad that I want to vote IC for his nonsensical walls?

Yes. And wt actual f is “nonsensical” about them? Is this even a serious thought?

I wonder if I voted you, would FA consider that a scummy omgus? Lol

Because seriously, you really do look like you’re trying to solve based on little to none content.

Just saw this. Hi. I think you're scummy.

These omgussy type of posts, really do you no favours. Do you seriously disagree with this? Nero also noticed it.

Where did Nero notice it

XD

this

is a

In post 892, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 856, Chickadee wrote:I just got home, there's 9 new pages.

I just got home and you're still doing nothing.

In post 858, Innocent Children wrote:plus the lack of resistance to her wagon

this isn't really true though b/c her wagon capped at what like 4 or 5 votes? I'd argue that the lack of a big wagon on her

IS

resistance to her wagon. There haven't really been any big wagons this game.

Yeah true but I wish she send more people gifts. Then I could get some idea, if my analysis of her gift has any kind of basis or not.