Mafiascum.net

In post 874, Brigitte wrote:

In post 846, Alonzo wrote:My scum game is pretty basic, I sheep shit townies with shit reads. I'm not proud of myself. That's why I cast a suspicious eye at those lining up behind you...

This seems like it is trying to disprove Alonzo being scum but really makes me think this is what he doing here with his reads.

#NotHelpingYourCase

It's good that you acknowledge you believe my meta case to be truthful, in time you will see I'm a trustworthy guy.

#psyoujustcalledRCashittowny

I don't believe people lie about their meta. I believe they manipulate their meta but they believe and know their meta to a good degree.

I also find it humorous you fire back with 'you just called RC as shit town', no I am saying he likely has a shit read you are exploiting and you can fall back on the meta you say by "well I only sheep BAD TOWN", which is what you are going for with this defense. It's a good shift when you want to manipulate that little meta aspect. Instead of sheeping bad players you sheep good players with bad reads.

If I was shit sheeping RC rest assured he would have mentioned it..

What?

Meaning RC has v good knowledge of my meta from joining the site til present.

He also is scumreading you though?

Is he?
He never told me.
What about you?

In post 793, RadiantCowbells wrote:Still prefer parmigiana vote but I suppose I support Alonzo wagon

Most recent post talking about you.

In post 882, Alonzo wrote:Is he?
He never told me.
What about you?

He is, and he scumreads me I believe. He has a lot of scumreads this game and I think pointing to his reads on yourself here without even knowing what his read on you is very reaching.

Sure he thought I could have been open wolfing with parma and GL, but that was some time ago

Pedit

Meh, he won't try that sort of thing til L1 if he even does, as he won't want the accountability, if hes even seriously considering me an option.

I'd consider any such hostilities a tell.

In post 885, Alonzo wrote:Sure he thought I could have been open wolfing with parma and GL, but that was some time ago

Pedit

Meh, he won't try that sort of thing til L1 if he even does, as he won't want the accountability, if hes even seriously considering me an option.

I'd consider any such hostilities a tell.

His last post about his stance on you was 5 pages ago. I don't even think that was about you/parma/Gl but about you and Parma and GL, but I don't know what that matters in this instance.

Are you saying if RC is pushing that he is sorting out options from a scum mindset? What exactly is your read on RC then?

other RC are you available to talk at any point?

I just realized your initials is RC. This is going to make this game confusing. Can you go get a name change?

call us by separate heads or reality or something like that

hell call us reach

In post 889, Ankamius wrote:call us by separate heads or reality or something like that

hell call us reach

I swear I'm not usually this bad with alt slips

I will call you snowball.

sure

Here's some un-synced thoughts of a head, breaking this up to avoid large walls.

In post 811, GuiltyLion wrote:

In post 688, Michael Scott wrote:ISO skim leaves me with a strong townread on Fractured.

1. RVS mindmeld on townreads - I'd imagine scum would pick apart and attack one of the RVS posters, I was expecting to be called awkward for it.
2. 528 and 631 - Clear, transparent stances on things early in the game without any real need to. +town indicative.

this is a tremendously bad post, for the record

1 - everybody knows faking townreads as scum is easy. It also feels like unnatural/forced reasoning - "they're not playing how in this specific manner I would expect scum to play, therefore they're town"
2 - there was definite need to, because several people were scumreading them and voting them. like you're giving them town credit for doing something that either alignment would want to do to look town.

I have to think a townie - especially players of Auro/volxen caliber - would see that a scum!Fractured could fake this level of content so far and would have more paranoia than a "strong townread" after an ISO skim.

this feels like a fabricated townread because they already decided previously that they didn't want to scumread Fractured slot

VOTE: Michael Scott

You didn't absolve your read on us in 806, where you stated a reason to townread and a reason to scumread us , even though you were telling people you wanted to sell them on voting us, but you didn't follow up on that at all. 486

What changed from this point?

When this hydra noted you've kept your vote on us, you vote over how fabricated you deem his townread on to be, one of the few people who has resisted the scumreads here. I believe its validity because -scum has nothing to gain from that post.

So I don't understand your points on fabricating a townread. both don't have a lot of first-hand experience with either head, so why do you expect them to know we WOULD be scum?

You don't evaluate the post links of this hydra that made to back-up his townread. 528 631

The bolded is an assumption had planned to townread us prior to that post, off what basis?

Because isn't paranoid enough over our slot?

VOTE: GuiltyLion

I don't believe your stance here.

In post 848, Varsoon wrote:It's still implosion, folks.

would like more than this.

Responding to any post outside discussing a few people would greatly improve people's perception of you this game.

What do you think about recent posts?

How do you feel about wagons?

In post 851, RadiantCowbells wrote:Does anyone townread parmigiano

Can they explain why

Parmigiana how do you feel about my push on you?

Can you explain your scumread?

I feel like both heads have touched up on this. 528 631 695 854

However, I disagree with my other head that people agree with us, given the recent pages.

Probably tonight, tomorrow at the latest - when both heads can post - we'll outline our reads on because we're not feeling the scumreads there.

is a little less in read confidence for head, but both heads aren't feeling a lynch there, we plan to look focus our read there as well.

Why did you parry , ? Or did I misread...

Taly what are your current reads?

I don't care about reasoning atm just what they are and relatively how strong they are

In post 834, implosion wrote:Consider my vote on Michael Scott.

Still don't see the case here.



Furthermore, I'd like to do something aside from dodging the posts from this hydra.

And I want to digress on his current vote.

Reality Check wrote:Taly what are your current reads?

I don't care about reasoning atm just what they are and relatively how strong they are

Reality
MS, RC, Parm, Vars
Alonzo, Brigitte, Implo
Johnny
Lovebird
GuiltyLion
mbaki

Some reads are volatile, and ones I'll be looking at more with my other head - but this is pretty much where I'm at, I distrust the gamestate.

What is the source of the townread on me?