Mafiascum.net

Oops wrong thread

What are you doing stalking me
git out of here

In post 396, LuckyOtter wrote:Okiedokie then. I'm not getting the townvibes off of Redemption like everyone else apparently is, but I'm not going to be able to fully sort him today either. UNVOTE:

Nice sheeping btw. I'm sure you're glad I'm looking back now.

In post 568, PenguinPower wrote:

In post 553, Vorkuta wrote:Wagons -> fluidity of wagon -> resistance of wagon -> associations -> ??? -> solves

Yay! Vorkuta gets it.

How do you want my input on something so broad? How does this apply to the current game?

In post 877, Redemption wrote:Nice sheeping btw

is when you vote for someone BECAUSE another person did so.
I'm not aware of UNVOTE SHEEPING being a thing but *shrugs*

In post 878, Redemption wrote:How does this apply to the current game?

*sighs*
Your scum read on penguin is BASED on the fact that he votehops randomly.
This quote ^ is an adequate explanation that accounts for his flippity-floppity-votey-hoppity behavior.
IN LIGHT OF THIS NEW INFORMATION, would you like to reassess your read on him (and to some extent yours truly as well)?

Also come on- you picked THIS 1/3 out of everything to reply to?

In post 555, Vorkuta wrote:@REDEMPTION
Ok- the first time you called PP defensive was in response to

In post 340, PenguinPower wrote:So...scum hunting in RVS is scummy unless your MJL mentioning an RVS wagon on schadd because the RVS wagon on schadd was a ruse.

and his barrage of gifs to support this.

This PP sentence is completely valid, and points out several contradictions/cases of double standards being applied.
It's not defensiveness- as in my experience this would be accompanied by an increase of "emotions"/"anger"/"backlash"
Thus your reasoning for a scum!PP isn't one I can get behind (as much as I would want to )

You know, maybe I was way too partial on the whole thing, especially for how little that lead was. It was so early in the game it was all I had. But now, I'm digging a lot of stuff up. I'm actually willing to give PenguinPower a chance.

In post 879, Vorkuta wrote:

In post 877, Redemption wrote:Nice sheeping btw

SHEEPING

is when you vote for someone BECAUSE another person did so.
I'm not aware of UNVOTE SHEEPING being a thing but *shrugs*

I mean, he unvoted me just because everyone else was doing it. If that's not a sheep move, idk what sheeping is.

Why do you actually discredit and critisize everything I say? Can't you get off my dick and make up your own mind sometimes?

Both of you and Not_Mafia are scaring me. All you are doing is either lynching Danny Devito or leeching off people's arguments to act like low-profile neutral fucks. What the hell are you even doing here?

More on Otter soon.

In post 855, LuckyOtter wrote:I will answer, but also want to know how I ended up so far down your list. I don't recall you scumreading me before. In fact, last time you mentioned me at all you seemed to be leaning townie.

More the reasons to townread you don't seem very good rather than thinking you're strongly scum. I think what puts you lower than the others is going back through your iso I feel like your attempts to solve for today aren't very structured, but this is something that could be playstyle. The difference between your tier and CDB/Redemption tier isn't actually that extreme in my mind which is why I asked both tiers to comment on the one below.

That being said, a little concerned that me asking whether your slot is "maybe townie" about one posts made you feel like I had enough of a townread on you that you decided to hedge on what you think about schadd

In post 867, Performer wrote:His read list of putting me, schadd and you as his highest scumreads, is also too bizarre.

In what world is this "too bizarre"?

In post 857, Performer wrote:To answer whoever asked me - I have a shadd town.

To be clear, you don't know who you're responding to when responding to a question from your 1/2 scumread? Also I guess this is all I'm getting as to why you have that read?

I was hoping by now something more significant in this game would gel for me. It just isn't. This is all I got so far.

Town – Based more on statements made by Zuckerberg and not contradicted by anything contributed by Psyche.
Town – Based on statements made earlier in the game.
Town – I’ve only played one other game with this user, but he seems relaxed and open as he did in his other town game. He did try to engage with me fair and square when I placed a naked vote on him but I got distracted and forgot to respond. Sorry ‘bout that.
Town – I guess genuinely trying to game solve and I think his efforts bear fruit.
Provisional Town based on PR claim. I was null on him before.
Town – Based on Chennisden seeing Redemption as scum. I’d gotten nothing of value from Gamma Emerald other than his wagon on me was at least from a logical, town-minded position.
Town: There’s a few things here and there that are NAI, and maybe even a few things that seem scummy, but they’re counteracted by enough town things to tip the scales for me. He seems to be asking game-solvey questions.
Null to Town. I think this player relies heavily on emotion and gut to make reads and that's not something I really connect well with. Still, at least there's effort.
Null. I like that Vorkuta is pushing Redemption now. I previously felt that Vorkuta was scummy by association with him.
Null.
Null. This player has not posted since May 24th.
Scum. (Sorry, Redemption! ) I think he manipulated us into cutting him some slack but I no longer believe slack is warranted. I’m leery of the vanishing act and threats to replace out and I’m suspicious that it might just be a carefully constructed scum cover for survival. In hindsight, that meltdown feels like it was just an act.

CDB’s activity levels are unacceptable tbh

Redemption discussing the DP movie is scummy because it feels like a substitute for actually playing

In post 887, chennisden wrote:Redemption discussing the DP movie is scummy because it feels like a substitute for actually playing

Everything he does is scummy! I've been sitting here wondering how no one else sees it.

Mary, what from schadd makes you think he is "genuinely trying to game solve"?

VC 1.07

Redemption:

MaryJoLisa

Psyche:

Performer:

Vorkuta

Not_Mafia:

Detective Pikachu:

Performer, ChannelDelibird, PenguinPower, Not_Mafia, Redemption

ChannelDelibird:

chennisden:

schadd_

LuckyOtter:

MaryJoLisa:

Lil Uzi Vert

Vorkuta:

Lil Uzi Vert:

LuckyOtter

PenguinPower:

schadd_:

Detective Pikachu

Not Voting:

Psyche, chennisden

With

13

votes,

7

to lynch

Deadline: (expired on 2019-06-01 20:55:23)

chennisden wrote:Redemption discussing the DP movie is scummy because it feels like a substitute for actually playing

Says the guy who doesn't reply shit when asked to emphasize on his single-sentenced reads.

Not_Mafia wrote:CDB’s activity levels are unacceptable tbh

You're no one talk actually. He may be inactive but he still has done more than you did for us.

In post 888, MaryJoLisa wrote:

In post 887, chennisden wrote:Redemption discussing the DP movie is scummy because it feels like a substitute for actually playing

Everything he does is scummy! I've been sitting here wondering how no one else sees it.

Who are you people? All I do is playing. Regardless of what happens, I do my damn best to help town and share all of my reads.

*pokes this game with a stick*
: CDB?

Can we get a vote count as well?

Vote count, please!

In post 889, Detective Pikachu wrote:Mary, what from schadd makes you think he is "genuinely trying to game solve"?

Fair and square, his push on you generated a reaction. I think town seeks those reactions to sort people.

VORKUTA VERY OFFICIAL 1000!% GUARANTEED TO BE CORRECT VOTE COUNT VOLUME 2

Performer, ChannelDelibird, PenguinPower, Not_Mafia, Redemption (5)
MaryJoLisa (1)
Vorkuta (1)
schadd_ (1)
Lil Uzi Vert (1)
LuckyOtter (1)
Detective Pikachu (1)

Psyche, Chennisden (2)

That’s a weird one.

Most other people who've been wagoned feel like lynchbait
I want to poke around here
VOTE: Schadd

pedit
ikr- honestly tempted to L-1/hammer as I previously said as I don't buy the UB claim and that's probably the way it's going to go but *shrugs*