Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 10:50 am
Evenstar's pretty transparently scum.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Haha, thanks!In post 878, Tana and Ephraim wrote:Wait my hydra partner already voted Evenstar.
I'm super proud of Tana rn
Well she's already decided you're scum. If she had flipped the read I'd probably be suspicious of her. This is in her townrange however.In post 826, gameplay506 wrote:Hm idk RCE I don't see Titus trying to solve me here, I see Titus banging her fist on the table, going GP is scum, while providing some pretty made-up reasoning for it.In post 138, Titus wrote:Ok 5 bucks based on everything that's happened gameplay is seriously scum here. Bitmap's likely scum or useful to them.In post 130, gameplay506 wrote:Idk most players have been joking but Titus is the only one who left an odd feeling in me
Same with bitmap but replace odd with good
Oof sorry if I'm being too serious and ruining the fun, I will go back to my rl now
VOTE: Gameplay
RC's voting based on vendetta.
Pops is voting to get a reaction.
Cafe getting a counter wagon going in RVS isn't an issue at all. I might have done the same.
Gameplay's posting however is over justified. Titus has an "odd" feeling. Bitmap has a "good" feeling. Yet he breaks the posting up into several posts and is real defensive about it.
Pops, real life does suck. I'd rather not think about it. I put it elsewhere but there's real high odds I'm getting a divorce.
And the fact that she just continues to read me in the same way 15 pages later with still minimal effort to solve me out makes me think she is just comfortable keeping that read and not comfortable backing out of it.
Right now...
Who is this cop person btwIn post 882, Lady Eventide wrote:Cop: Scummy in a vague kind of way; I don't like them, I want to see more. I had a better reason but I've lost it somewhere.
I'm talking about post #847, where you literally say you're "not in a particular rush to lynch [me] because
I read what?In post 891, Lady Eventide wrote:2: Does it make sense that Tana might think I have a weak scumgame after reading WC1?
... You're as of yet still not convincing me that you've actually read the scumgame. If you've read my ISO there's a big goddamn obviousIn post 890, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I noticed several tonal tics that I find to be also present here that are present in significantly lower quantities in the town games that I read.
Yes, I said I was in no rush to lynch you. I said that about all of my other scumreads as well because like I have said many times forcing content out of lurkers is a high priority for me.
I did express before that wallpost that I intended to vote you (if we hadn't already been voting you) so claiming that I'm trying to keep you around as a later mislynch is inaccurate at best.
Re: the rest of your post: we agree on forcing content from lurkers at least. I still dislike that you hedged in case this went badly for you.In post 890, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I noticed several tonal tics that I find to be also present here that are present in significantly lower quantities in the town games that I read.
Yes, I said I was in no rush to lynch you. I said that about all of my other scumreads as well because like I have said many times forcing content out of lurkers is a high priority for me.
I did express before that wallpost that I intended to vote you (if we hadn't already been voting you) so claiming that I'm trying to keep you around as a later mislynch is inaccurate at best.
Re: the rest of your post: we agree on forcing content from lurkers at least. I still dislike that you hedged in case this went badly for you.
Swing and a miss xIn post 896, Tana and Ephraim wrote:I put very little stock in what most people consider alignment indicative content and a lot of stock in stuff that most people wouldn't even think to consider alignment indicative.
How people say and do things is to me far more important than what people actually say and do and your entire list on how to read you is the latter rather than the former.
~Ephraim
Re: the rest of your post: we agree on forcing content from lurkers at least. I still dislike that you hedged in case this went badly for you.