Page 36 of 51

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:49 pm
by DrDolittle
im actually overall just still pretty confused.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 5:50 pm
by DrDolittle
vork engage with me. do you find january independently scummy or is she scummy purely by association with skitter?

skitter who's vork's partner?

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:31 pm
by Zenith
In post 873, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 866, Zenith wrote:
VOTE: Vork L-1
@Vork
Please respond to .
Explain why the change?
What change?

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 7:33 pm
by Plotinus
Official Vote Count 2.07
Image




LynchingWith 7 votes in play, it takes 4 to lynch.

Vorkuta
(3): skitter30, Karnage, Zenith
Zenith
(1): tictac
Karnage
(1): Vorkuta
skitter30
(1): january

Not Voting
(1): DrDolittle

Deadline:
(expired on 2019-11-05 07:45:00).


Mod notes:
:][/area]

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:42 pm
by Plotinus
january1 has been prodded and has (expired on 2019-11-02 19:22:00) to post before I start looking for a replacement.

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:51 pm
by january
hi sorry just got the email

i've been catching up with this thread, just have a big paper due in a few hours and i promise i'll participate after this

UNVOTE:
i know vork's been using some shady logic but not really ready to vote him
will decide if anything's changed by noon tomorrow pacific time

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:53 pm
by january
or i guess it's noon today
whatever it's in like 10 hours

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 9:56 pm
by january
mandatory actual contribution post - or not
In post 875, DrDolittle wrote:im actually overall just still pretty confused.
whenever i've played mafia, "i'm confused" was often a scumtell - as confused town, people tended to just put effort into un-confusing themselves, but mafia declares that they're confused (maybe to seem towny idk)

anyways that was heavy meta that might not even apply to this site but that's all the effort i have in me at this moment
promise i'll be back for real soon
don't end the day pls

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:08 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 805, Zenith wrote:If January were to flip town, would you still be scum reading skitter?
If not, then do you think it could be better to lynch january instead of skitter?
If you would still scum read her, then who is her partner if jan flips town?
I think that skitter's scum!partner is gated until skitter hangs.
Looking back at it, I slightly regret making the gamestate skitter v. vork and can see how it's suboptimal to have such a 1v1 early on in D2, but I'm quite sure I've caught scum that it doesn't really matter.

But ok- let's hypothetically assume that BOTH skitter and I could be convinced to calm down for half a second (haaaaaa.... no) and stop being at each other's throats enough to scumhunt OUTSIDE vork v. skit
-Where would we start?
-
Skitter
the louder scum!partner will find creative ways to disrupt legitimate inquiries and have several red herrings/wild-goose-chases planned for us

Either way-
as I've probably said somewhere before
my jan push was primarily a way to see whether I could get a read on skitter.
Sure I thought december had scum!equity at the end of D1, but I realized that there was no way we'd get a consensus lynch going for her if she was actually scum.
The same applies to ~3 other people, so my gameplan was to try and scumhunt/PoE the influential/gamestate controlling players {tictac/skit/Zenith} which would allow for us to open up the lynchpool on D3.
Fortunately I think I've hit dirt with skitter, but if things would have gone differently and I legitimately had a town!read on her, I'd move on to a similar grilling of tictac. I'm glad I don't have to seeing as I've played most of my hand this round, but *shrugs*

Sorry what were the questions again?
Ah yes- skitter scum (is now)=> independent of jan thus
1- Jan town!flip -> Yes to scum!skitter flip
2- Skitter optimal flip today as you won't catch her scum!partner with her still alive
3-
this question's wording is painful- who's the first "her" again?

HYPOTHETICALLY if for some miraculous reason jan was the lynch today, I'd look into someone who isn't in control of the gamestate as skitter's scum partner- i.e DDL/Zenith
I'd be butthurt if 2 "loud and good" players managed to weasel their way in to everyone's core!town books while dictating gameflow, so I'm not considering that option.
It's skitter doing the heavy lifting, + someone quiet/playing catchup

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:10 pm
by Vorkuta
Oh shit- I literally just missed Jan chickening out on skitter right now.
Puzzle pieces fall in place.

reVOTE: Skitter

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:08 am
by Karnage
neat thing about this particular game state is that there's really no reason for anybody to state intent before lynching. anybody not voting vorkuta could just hammer away and I wouldn't see it as scummy. I mean it would be courteous to do so but not necessary

I'm going to take a look at jan's ISO in the meantime

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:26 am
by DrDolittle
Vork you didnt answer my question in is Jan independly scummy outside of skit scum to you.

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:34 am
by DrDolittle
@ Jan I say I'm confused as town often so I iso myself to prove it. I did it in open 776, a redacted game and here in a marathon game super clearly
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=Go
It's not an AI thing for me.

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:37 am
by Vorkuta
In post 886, DrDolittle wrote:Vork you didnt answer my question in is Jan independly scummy outside of skit scum to you.
In post 883, Vorkuta wrote:Sure I thought december had scum!equity at the end of D1
Did you uhh... completely skip the part where I was giving her a hard time even before I decided to add skitter into the picture?

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:41 am
by DrDolittle
You also said you are giving her a hard time to try to read skitter better? Plus having scum equity could be anywhere below null. Like wo skits flip if how independently scummy is jan?

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:42 am
by DrDolittle
I'm trying to assess if you are truly having read or just OTP scum blindly tunneling skitter

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:49 am
by Vorkuta
So again
Did you read the stuff directed towards january (confidence + word choice + snarky remarks) before D2 or not?

Those were genuine. Skitter popped up into my thought process when I actually decided to take the day seriously and solve at the beginning of D2.
In post 890, DrDolittle wrote:OTP scum
This is a highly sub-optimal scum!play and extremely uncharacteristic of how I play scum so.....
those words sound familiar....

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:51 am
by DrDolittle
Yeah I remember that. That's your 30 30 30 10 or something

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:51 am
by DrDolittle
But didnt that again hinge on CJ and thus skitter being scum? Or I'm confusing your arguments

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:56 am
by Karnage
the way I remember it, day 1 vork voted january for "pressure" while ignoring his scum reads/leans and eventually used Jan's reaction to said "pressure" as justification for his vote

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 3:39 am
by Karnage
In post 883, Vorkuta wrote: Either way-
as I've probably said somewhere before
my jan push was primarily a way to see whether I could get a read on skitter.
Sure I thought december had scum!equity at the end of D1, but I realized that there was no way we'd get a consensus lynch going for her if she was actually scum.
The same applies to ~3 other people, so my gameplan was to try and scumhunt/PoE the influential/gamestate controlling players
{tictac/skit/Zenith}
which would allow for us to open up the lynchpool on D3.
Fortunately I think I've hit dirt with skitter, but if things would have gone differently and I legitimately had a town!read on her, I'd move on to a similar grilling of tictac. I'm glad I don't have to seeing as I've played most of my hand this round, but *shrugs*
where are you with these 3 atm?

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:31 am
by skitter30
In post 871, DrDolittle wrote:why do you find the bolded scummy?
Because it feels like he's cherry-picking facts out of contsxt to support his case

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:31 am
by skitter30
In post 872, DrDolittle wrote:I don't think it's that hard to understand at all. Feels a bit gaslight-y. Sure vorkuta's case is not 100 percent watersealed but I feel like what you are doing is asking a bunch of questions and trying to catch him off guard rather than responding in good faith idk... It's different than [redacted] evidence.
No

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:32 am
by skitter30
In post 872, DrDolittle wrote:I buy this. Actually up to this point, I felt the same way in this exchange, in that the burden of proof that you place on vork is absurd, where as he is really in good faith trying to engage you.
Can you, perhaps, point to a place where i'm doing that?

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 4:33 am
by skitter30
In post 873, DrDolittle wrote:> Explain?
Not on a phone, maybe when i'm on a pc tom night