Page 36 of 165

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:42 am
by Invisibility
is Rex, prodgingffngnt???

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:56 am
by Ankamius
In post 872, Invisibility wrote:
In post 818, Ankamius wrote:Well that was certainly an engagement
Ok ank
Hi invis its nice to see you again

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:35 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 867, Nicholai wrote:why'd you choose to comment on that of everything, Rex? can i hear your opinion on Gjt's scumread on Nomo? do you think it's genuine and/or correct?

loving the new avatar btw; you look dazzling
It was just the first thing I saw, I wanted people to know I was still playing. You should expect a larger post in about 2 hours.
I would also like to apologise for my absence. Be assured it will not happen again.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:45 am
by Kanna
I had a reread of some of the stuff between me and Joges and think maybe I was a bit critical? Joges looks better on iso read and I’m sorry if you got the feeling I was tunneling in on you I guess :/ I still think Non is town on gut but his participation is low even for him I think and I’m a little concerned.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:46 am
by Kanna
<Rex, bob, looker, gjt, nomnomnom, non imh>

scum should be in here, maybe?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:50 am
by Ankamius
Is that a poe or scum list

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:54 am
by Flavor Leaf
In post 874, Invisibility wrote:
In post 849, Looker wrote:theFuzzyLogic and FlavorLeaf are town
wacky
Scummy

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:15 am
by Nicholai
upon reconsideration, gjt is my top suspect for
reasons
to be disclosed later, but i would like to hear back from Looker and see Rex's catchup first and foremost

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:21 am
by Looker
In post 860, Gjt wrote:
In post 855, Nicholai wrote:@Gjt: do you think omnon also overreacted in her exchange with Looker, or is justified there?
I feel Omnon is very defensive and seems to react easily. I have seen this a lot in the past from a frustrated Townie especially when turned out the had a power role and if Town it does get frustrating throughout the game when all you do is tell the truth but are accused of lying from both Town and Scum.

However I am sticking with my gut on this one and believe her to be Scum
In post 861, nomnomnom wrote:I have all the reasons to believe someone is town because how they're reacting to the game is townie and I've seen it a lot before but because I am stubborn and can't be assed to give other reads so I'll still vote them die scum

???
@TheFuzzylogic99/Flavor Leaf:
What's the likelihood of Gjt and nomnomnom being scum together? Gjt avoided my request for reads on Salamence20 and Joges in Post 488.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:33 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 805, nomnomnom wrote:Ank how do you feel about wagoning invis with me
In your iso at this point you have too little justification. Whilst you may have stated that you scumread him, you have little evidence he is scummy, and so to attempt to start a wagon without absolute certainty Invisibility is scum isn’t good.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:34 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 796, Nicholai wrote:alright i'm done here, that's more than enough effort for one day.

omnom rex gjt invis are potential scum for me right now

let me know who you're townreading omnom, and please elaborate your scumread on me if it still there outside of the salsa vote

@gjt: what's your opinion of rex so far this game?
Could you elaborate a little on these reads?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:37 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 840, joges wrote:
In post 836, Kanna wrote:
In post 833, joges wrote:
In post 825, Kanna wrote:
In post 821, joges wrote:
In post 758, Kanna wrote:Agree Gjt's vote was bad but jojes vote was opportunistic uhhh
Which vote?
This one. Kinda ties into what I said earlier; I personally don’t agree with Gjt vote/logic at all but it could still be a genuine thought process. The fact you’re voting him cause he looked bad was kinda opportunistic
In post 739, joges wrote:
In post 734, Gjt wrote:I would've thought you would have already checked their ISO when you took over. It's not a stupid question, but then if your Scum you wouldn't need to I guess as you would know who is Town and can just call it your own reads
Here's a theory. This is a scum point of view. Why would a town player need to read what their replacement has done? I would think scum replacing in would want to see what kind of BS the previous player in their slot has posted or thought. People lying will care what their spot has said, people not lying will just start from their entrance and go.

Gjt asking this makes me think they have a scum point of view as I feel only scum would want to read the previous player said.

VOTE: Gjt
I don't see how starting a wagon on someone is opportunistic. Being the second vote, or putting someone on L1, is more of where I would check my "Is this opportunistic?" meter. I don't see how explaining my theory/reasoning behind my action can be deemed as opportunistic. I really feel like you're trying to say "scum hunting is opportunistic"...
You know I’m not saying “scumhunting is opportunistic”. What I’m saying is at that moment, Gjt looked kinda bad and nomnomnom could potentially be open to voting him so you jumped in first.
Well let me just sit back and wait for someone to get to L1 and I'll hammer them. I won't bother you with any more of my input or decision making.
This isn’t a great reply. Jones could have said anything that would have made him seem more towny: scum!Joges doesn’t want to be lynched, town!Jojes doesn’t want to be mislynched. It wasn’t good logic for Jojes to reply this way, as all it does is makes him seem angry and unable to listen to reason.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:39 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 850, Flavor Leaf wrote:Drinks on me
I’m a little confused as to the intention of this post.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:41 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 772, Ankamius wrote:honestly though

the way he talks is hard for me to read so I wouldn't really put any stock in that specifically
I also struggle to correctly interpret what other people say. My apologies if this style bothers you, I simply find it easier to communicate my ideas in this form, as I feel they are less easily misunderstood.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:42 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 703, Invisibility wrote:is it just me or has rex been kicked in the ribs by like everyone in the entire game UNVOTE:
I don’t think this justification is good enough. If a player appears scummy, is it not right to attack them for it?

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:45 am
by SausasaurusRex
In post 867, Nicholai wrote:why'd you choose to comment on that of everything, Rex? can i hear your opinion on Gjt's scumread on Nomo? do you think it's genuine and/or correct?

loving the new avatar btw; you look dazzling
A gut feeling is never a good enough reason to vote. However, I also don’t see this coming from scum; for scum would want to use logic to make people agree. A “gut feeling” fails to achieve that. Therefore, I would say it’s not indicative of alignment.

I’m not entirely sure what you’re referring to as my “new avatar”, I didn’t change it.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:47 am
by SausasaurusRex
My apologies for the number of posts. I had intended to put it in a single post, but, due to me using a mobile, I could not get the formatting to work. I believe I covered the important bits, but if anyone thinks I missed something, please tell me and I will rectify it.
Currently, I don’t believe anyone is scummy enough for a vote.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 11:05 am
by Gjt
In post 883, Looker wrote:
In post 860, Gjt wrote:
In post 855, Nicholai wrote:@Gjt: do you think omnon also overreacted in her exchange with Looker, or is justified there?
I feel Omnon is very defensive and seems to react easily. I have seen this a lot in the past from a frustrated Townie especially when turned out the had a power role and if Town it does get frustrating throughout the game when all you do is tell the truth but are accused of lying from both Town and Scum.

However I am sticking with my gut on this one and believe her to be Scum
In post 861, nomnomnom wrote:I have all the reasons to believe someone is town because how they're reacting to the game is townie and I've seen it a lot before but because I am stubborn and can't be assed to give other reads so I'll still vote them die scum

???
@TheFuzzylogic99/Flavor Leaf:
What's the likelihood of Gjt and nomnomnom being scum together? Gjt avoided my request for reads on Salamence20 and Joges in Post 488.
I actually missed that post and I apologise wasn't ignoring it and dunno why I missed, must have been whilst I was Skimming. I take it there is no way of getting notifications on this site if tagged or quoted? Only use mobile whether that makes a difference.

Anyways, I didn't really have much of an opinion on Joges. Nothing originally stood out and I was focusing on others. Just done a quick ISO and only just seen their post for voting me. I'm not ruling them out as Town or Scum, but currently not my highest priority. Some of their posts really don't sit well especially mention of just waiting and hammering. This could all well be just a frustrated post and not be an obvious thing they'd do and by saying it it looks very Scummy and supposedly meant to give off the opposite affect, because Scum would not wanna draw attention to thenselves by making comments like that, but again this can also be a Scum tactic to try and get people to just over look it.

I'm not 100% convinced by anyone currently and as I said before whether I have a strong feeling or not everyone is Scum until I believe otherwise maybe I just have trust issues

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:10 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 887, SausasaurusRex wrote:
In post 850, Flavor Leaf wrote:Drinks on me
I’m a little confused as to the intention of this post.
Don’t overthink it

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:12 pm
by Flavor Leaf
In post 883, Looker wrote:
In post 860, Gjt wrote:
In post 855, Nicholai wrote:@Gjt: do you think omnon also overreacted in her exchange with Looker, or is justified there?
I feel Omnon is very defensive and seems to react easily. I have seen this a lot in the past from a frustrated Townie especially when turned out the had a power role and if Town it does get frustrating throughout the game when all you do is tell the truth but are accused of lying from both Town and Scum.

However I am sticking with my gut on this one and believe her to be Scum
In post 861, nomnomnom wrote:I have all the reasons to believe someone is town because how they're reacting to the game is townie and I've seen it a lot before but because I am stubborn and can't be assed to give other reads so I'll still vote them die scum

???
@TheFuzzylogic99/Flavor Leaf:
What's the likelihood of Gjt and nomnomnom being scum together? Gjt avoided my request for reads on Salamence20 and Joges in Post 488.
I could see it, but i wouldn’t like bet my life on it yet. I’ll keep an eye out for this, I hadn’t gotten the link you seem to have there.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:45 pm
by Nicholai
In post 853, Nicholai wrote:don't worry, friend, attack isn't used in a negative way; i'm using it as a word to describe you questioning onnom's alignment (which is the norm in a game of mafia)

why do you think omnom has no reads? what doesn't satisfy you about the ones she's provided?
^when you have the time, Looker.

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:46 pm
by Ankamius
I'll try to get into the game proper over the weekend

sorry, I've been sleeping like shit the last few daysand I'm waiting on a personal pt since that makes readthroughs more productive for me

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:11 pm
by TheFuzzylogic99
@Looker
I outright oppose linking two-player together especially before one of them actually flip scum. I think this is terrible thinking.

I will take a look at Gjt and Nom ISO and see if there anything that rings as scum about either one

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I still have not seen anything to make me think Leaf is town. I find it hard to read him.

Some of Nons post reads scummy. I prob will go back to see if there anything there as well

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:54 pm
by Gjt
Just a heads up for next 4 days well nights I'm back working so again 13/14 hours of my day will be work and travelling plus I need to sleep so my activity will be limited. Will do best to logon on breaks and when get home etc

Posted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:58 pm
by Kanna
Sigh I just lost a town game